Cargando…

Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors

Non-destructive biomass estimation of vegetation has been performed via remote sensing as well as physical measurements. An effective method for estimating biomass must have accuracy comparable to the accepted standard of destructive removal. Estimation or measurement of height is commonly employed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pittman, Jeremy Joshua, Arnall, Daryl Brian, Interrante, Sindy M., Moffet, Corey A., Butler, Twain J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635415
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150202920
_version_ 1782362518528720896
author Pittman, Jeremy Joshua
Arnall, Daryl Brian
Interrante, Sindy M.
Moffet, Corey A.
Butler, Twain J.
author_facet Pittman, Jeremy Joshua
Arnall, Daryl Brian
Interrante, Sindy M.
Moffet, Corey A.
Butler, Twain J.
author_sort Pittman, Jeremy Joshua
collection PubMed
description Non-destructive biomass estimation of vegetation has been performed via remote sensing as well as physical measurements. An effective method for estimating biomass must have accuracy comparable to the accepted standard of destructive removal. Estimation or measurement of height is commonly employed to create a relationship between height and mass. This study examined several types of ground-based mobile sensing strategies for forage biomass estimation. Forage production experiments consisting of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were employed to examine sensor biomass estimation (laser, ultrasonic, and spectral) as compared to physical measurements (plate meter and meter stick) and the traditional harvest method (clipping). Predictive models were constructed via partial least squares regression and modeled estimates were compared to the physically measured biomass. Least significant difference separated mean estimates were examined to evaluate differences in the physical measurements and sensor estimates for canopy height and biomass. Differences between methods were minimal (average percent error of 11.2% for difference between predicted values versus machine and quadrat harvested biomass values (1.64 and 4.91 t·ha(−1), respectively), except at the lowest measured biomass (average percent error of 89% for harvester and quad harvested biomass < 0.79 t·ha(−1)) and greatest measured biomass (average percent error of 18% for harvester and quad harvested biomass >6.4 t·ha(−1)). These data suggest that using mobile sensor-based biomass estimation models could be an effective alternative to the traditional clipping method for rapid, accurate in-field biomass estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4367341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43673412015-04-30 Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors Pittman, Jeremy Joshua Arnall, Daryl Brian Interrante, Sindy M. Moffet, Corey A. Butler, Twain J. Sensors (Basel) Article Non-destructive biomass estimation of vegetation has been performed via remote sensing as well as physical measurements. An effective method for estimating biomass must have accuracy comparable to the accepted standard of destructive removal. Estimation or measurement of height is commonly employed to create a relationship between height and mass. This study examined several types of ground-based mobile sensing strategies for forage biomass estimation. Forage production experiments consisting of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were employed to examine sensor biomass estimation (laser, ultrasonic, and spectral) as compared to physical measurements (plate meter and meter stick) and the traditional harvest method (clipping). Predictive models were constructed via partial least squares regression and modeled estimates were compared to the physically measured biomass. Least significant difference separated mean estimates were examined to evaluate differences in the physical measurements and sensor estimates for canopy height and biomass. Differences between methods were minimal (average percent error of 11.2% for difference between predicted values versus machine and quadrat harvested biomass values (1.64 and 4.91 t·ha(−1), respectively), except at the lowest measured biomass (average percent error of 89% for harvester and quad harvested biomass < 0.79 t·ha(−1)) and greatest measured biomass (average percent error of 18% for harvester and quad harvested biomass >6.4 t·ha(−1)). These data suggest that using mobile sensor-based biomass estimation models could be an effective alternative to the traditional clipping method for rapid, accurate in-field biomass estimation. MDPI 2015-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4367341/ /pubmed/25635415 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150202920 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pittman, Jeremy Joshua
Arnall, Daryl Brian
Interrante, Sindy M.
Moffet, Corey A.
Butler, Twain J.
Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title_full Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title_fullStr Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title_short Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and Wheat Using Ultrasonic, Laser, and Spectral Sensors
title_sort estimation of biomass and canopy height in bermudagrass, alfalfa, and wheat using ultrasonic, laser, and spectral sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635415
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150202920
work_keys_str_mv AT pittmanjeremyjoshua estimationofbiomassandcanopyheightinbermudagrassalfalfaandwheatusingultrasoniclaserandspectralsensors
AT arnalldarylbrian estimationofbiomassandcanopyheightinbermudagrassalfalfaandwheatusingultrasoniclaserandspectralsensors
AT interrantesindym estimationofbiomassandcanopyheightinbermudagrassalfalfaandwheatusingultrasoniclaserandspectralsensors
AT moffetcoreya estimationofbiomassandcanopyheightinbermudagrassalfalfaandwheatusingultrasoniclaserandspectralsensors
AT butlertwainj estimationofbiomassandcanopyheightinbermudagrassalfalfaandwheatusingultrasoniclaserandspectralsensors