Cargando…
Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound infection is a preventable risk. One potential postoperative complication is blistering, which leads to increased pain, delayed healing, and higher care costs. The incidence of wound blisters has been reported to be between 6 and 24%. The aim of this study is to asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z |
_version_ | 1782362566848151552 |
---|---|
author | Bredow, Jan Oppermann, Johannes Hoffmann, Katharina Hellmich, Martin Wenk, Birte Simons, Marvin Eysel, Peer Zarghooni, Kourosh |
author_facet | Bredow, Jan Oppermann, Johannes Hoffmann, Katharina Hellmich, Martin Wenk, Birte Simons, Marvin Eysel, Peer Zarghooni, Kourosh |
author_sort | Bredow, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound infection is a preventable risk. One potential postoperative complication is blistering, which leads to increased pain, delayed healing, and higher care costs. The incidence of wound blisters has been reported to be between 6 and 24%. The aim of this study is to assess whether the risks of postoperative blistering and wound infections within the first 6 days postsurgery will be reduced using a special dressing compared to a standard one. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial in a University hospital. Patients presenting for knee or hip arthroplasty or spine procedures will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. After giving written informed consent, patients will be randomized to participate in the 7-day study during hospitalization. One hundred patients will be randomized per group. The primary outcome measure is blistering incidence from day 0 to day 6 postsurgery. Photo documentation will be evaluated in a blinded manner by the Clinical Evaluation Committee (CEC). DISCUSSION: A new dressing will be compared to the standard wound dressing regarding the risk of postoperative blistering, wound infection, and patient comfort. This study will assess the potential advantages of a modern wound dressing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01988818 (Entered 13 November 2011). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4367919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43679192015-03-21 Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Bredow, Jan Oppermann, Johannes Hoffmann, Katharina Hellmich, Martin Wenk, Birte Simons, Marvin Eysel, Peer Zarghooni, Kourosh Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound infection is a preventable risk. One potential postoperative complication is blistering, which leads to increased pain, delayed healing, and higher care costs. The incidence of wound blisters has been reported to be between 6 and 24%. The aim of this study is to assess whether the risks of postoperative blistering and wound infections within the first 6 days postsurgery will be reduced using a special dressing compared to a standard one. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial in a University hospital. Patients presenting for knee or hip arthroplasty or spine procedures will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. After giving written informed consent, patients will be randomized to participate in the 7-day study during hospitalization. One hundred patients will be randomized per group. The primary outcome measure is blistering incidence from day 0 to day 6 postsurgery. Photo documentation will be evaluated in a blinded manner by the Clinical Evaluation Committee (CEC). DISCUSSION: A new dressing will be compared to the standard wound dressing regarding the risk of postoperative blistering, wound infection, and patient comfort. This study will assess the potential advantages of a modern wound dressing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01988818 (Entered 13 November 2011). BioMed Central 2015-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4367919/ /pubmed/25873529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z Text en © Bredow et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bredow, Jan Oppermann, Johannes Hoffmann, Katharina Hellmich, Martin Wenk, Birte Simons, Marvin Eysel, Peer Zarghooni, Kourosh Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25873529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bredowjan clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oppermannjohannes clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannkatharina clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hellmichmartin clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wenkbirte clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simonsmarvin clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT eyselpeer clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zarghoonikourosh clinicaltrialtoevaluatetheperformanceofaflexibleselfadherentabsorbentdressingcoatedwithasoftsiliconelayercomparedtoastandardwounddressingafterorthopedicorspinalsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |