Cargando…

The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning

Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llena, Carmen, Cuesta, Carla, Forner, Leopoldo, Mozo, Sandra, Segura, Juan-Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088
_version_ 1782362586558234624
author Llena, Carmen
Cuesta, Carla
Forner, Leopoldo
Mozo, Sandra
Segura, Juan-Jose
author_facet Llena, Carmen
Cuesta, Carla
Forner, Leopoldo
Mozo, Sandra
Segura, Juan-Jose
author_sort Llena, Carmen
collection PubMed
description Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irrigation technique: A and B 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX with the Miraject needle and no agitation; C and D, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with Irrisafe 20 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX; E and F, PUI with Irrisafe 25 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2% CHX. The remaining dentine debris and opened tubules were evaluated by SEM at three root levels by two blinded investigators. The Kruskal Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups and levels, with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Debris elimination was significantly higher in PUI groups (p<0.05). PUI groups showed a higher capability to open tubules, compared to groups A and B. In the coronal third, groups D to F eliminated more debris and opened more tubules than conventional irrigation (p<0.05). In medium third, group E eliminated significantly more debris (1.60) than group A (2.60). No differences were obtained among groups in apical third. Both NaOCl and CHX applied with PUI showed no differences in debris elimination or opened tubules. Conclusions: Final PUI with Irrisafe tips was the most effective procedure for eliminating the debris and opening up dentinal tubules, independent of the irrigant solution or Irrisafe type size. Key words:Ultrasonic irrigation, PUI, sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4368021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43680212015-03-25 The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning Llena, Carmen Cuesta, Carla Forner, Leopoldo Mozo, Sandra Segura, Juan-Jose J Clin Exp Dent Research Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irrigation technique: A and B 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX with the Miraject needle and no agitation; C and D, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with Irrisafe 20 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX; E and F, PUI with Irrisafe 25 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2% CHX. The remaining dentine debris and opened tubules were evaluated by SEM at three root levels by two blinded investigators. The Kruskal Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups and levels, with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Debris elimination was significantly higher in PUI groups (p<0.05). PUI groups showed a higher capability to open tubules, compared to groups A and B. In the coronal third, groups D to F eliminated more debris and opened more tubules than conventional irrigation (p<0.05). In medium third, group E eliminated significantly more debris (1.60) than group A (2.60). No differences were obtained among groups in apical third. Both NaOCl and CHX applied with PUI showed no differences in debris elimination or opened tubules. Conclusions: Final PUI with Irrisafe tips was the most effective procedure for eliminating the debris and opening up dentinal tubules, independent of the irrigant solution or Irrisafe type size. Key words:Ultrasonic irrigation, PUI, sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine. Medicina Oral S.L. 2015-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4368021/ /pubmed/25810845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Llena, Carmen
Cuesta, Carla
Forner, Leopoldo
Mozo, Sandra
Segura, Juan-Jose
The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title_full The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title_fullStr The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title_full_unstemmed The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title_short The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
title_sort effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088
work_keys_str_mv AT llenacarmen theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT cuestacarla theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT fornerleopoldo theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT mozosandra theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT segurajuanjose theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT llenacarmen effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT cuestacarla effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT fornerleopoldo effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT mozosandra effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning
AT segurajuanjose effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning