Cargando…
The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning
Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088 |
_version_ | 1782362586558234624 |
---|---|
author | Llena, Carmen Cuesta, Carla Forner, Leopoldo Mozo, Sandra Segura, Juan-Jose |
author_facet | Llena, Carmen Cuesta, Carla Forner, Leopoldo Mozo, Sandra Segura, Juan-Jose |
author_sort | Llena, Carmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irrigation technique: A and B 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX with the Miraject needle and no agitation; C and D, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with Irrisafe 20 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX; E and F, PUI with Irrisafe 25 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2% CHX. The remaining dentine debris and opened tubules were evaluated by SEM at three root levels by two blinded investigators. The Kruskal Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups and levels, with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Debris elimination was significantly higher in PUI groups (p<0.05). PUI groups showed a higher capability to open tubules, compared to groups A and B. In the coronal third, groups D to F eliminated more debris and opened more tubules than conventional irrigation (p<0.05). In medium third, group E eliminated significantly more debris (1.60) than group A (2.60). No differences were obtained among groups in apical third. Both NaOCl and CHX applied with PUI showed no differences in debris elimination or opened tubules. Conclusions: Final PUI with Irrisafe tips was the most effective procedure for eliminating the debris and opening up dentinal tubules, independent of the irrigant solution or Irrisafe type size. Key words:Ultrasonic irrigation, PUI, sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4368021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43680212015-03-25 The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning Llena, Carmen Cuesta, Carla Forner, Leopoldo Mozo, Sandra Segura, Juan-Jose J Clin Exp Dent Research Objectives: the purpose of this study was to compare debris removal and open tubules effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) applied as final irrigation in different protocols Study Design: sixty extracted premolars were divided into six groups according to the final irrigation technique: A and B 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX with the Miraject needle and no agitation; C and D, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with Irrisafe 20 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2 % CHX; E and F, PUI with Irrisafe 25 tips and 3 % NaOCl or 2% CHX. The remaining dentine debris and opened tubules were evaluated by SEM at three root levels by two blinded investigators. The Kruskal Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups and levels, with a significance of p<0.05. Results: Debris elimination was significantly higher in PUI groups (p<0.05). PUI groups showed a higher capability to open tubules, compared to groups A and B. In the coronal third, groups D to F eliminated more debris and opened more tubules than conventional irrigation (p<0.05). In medium third, group E eliminated significantly more debris (1.60) than group A (2.60). No differences were obtained among groups in apical third. Both NaOCl and CHX applied with PUI showed no differences in debris elimination or opened tubules. Conclusions: Final PUI with Irrisafe tips was the most effective procedure for eliminating the debris and opening up dentinal tubules, independent of the irrigant solution or Irrisafe type size. Key words:Ultrasonic irrigation, PUI, sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine. Medicina Oral S.L. 2015-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4368021/ /pubmed/25810845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Llena, Carmen Cuesta, Carla Forner, Leopoldo Mozo, Sandra Segura, Juan-Jose The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title | The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title_full | The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title_fullStr | The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title_short | The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
title_sort | effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine
or 3% sodium hypochlorite in canal wall cleaning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT llenacarmen theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT cuestacarla theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT fornerleopoldo theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT mozosandra theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT segurajuanjose theeffectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT llenacarmen effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT cuestacarla effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT fornerleopoldo effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT mozosandra effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning AT segurajuanjose effectofpassiveultrasonicactivationof2chlorhexidineor3sodiumhypochloriteincanalwallcleaning |