Cargando…
Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and compare the appearance of different mechanical and biological complications, in screw-retained and cemented-retained single-tooth implant-supported restorations localized in the molar mandibular region, over a period of 1 to 4 years....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51708 |
_version_ | 1782362587689648128 |
---|---|
author | Ferreiroa, Alberto Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Pradíes, Guillermo Sola-Ruiz, María-Fernanda Agustín-Panadero, Rubén |
author_facet | Ferreiroa, Alberto Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Pradíes, Guillermo Sola-Ruiz, María-Fernanda Agustín-Panadero, Rubén |
author_sort | Ferreiroa, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and compare the appearance of different mechanical and biological complications, in screw-retained and cemented-retained single-tooth implant-supported restorations localized in the molar mandibular region, over a period of 1 to 4 years. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out with a total of eighty implant-supported restorations, which were placed in eighty patients for prosthetic rehabilitation of a mandibular molar. Forty patients were rehabilitated with a cemented-retained restoration and the other forty with a screw-retained restoration. The presence of the following complications was recorded for both types of prostheses: Fractures of the ceramic veneering, loosening screws, mucositis and peri-implantitis. Debonding of the restoration was analyzed in the cemented-retained restoration group. The clinical survival of crowns was analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier test and the clinical complications were compared, using a Student t test and Log-rank test. Results: 27 patients registered some complication. The average rate of complications was 37,5% for cemented-retained restorations and 30% for screw-retained restorations. The complications more common in the cemented-retained restoration were the presence of mucositis (14,87%), while in the screw-retained restorations was the loosening screw (20%). Student t test and Log-Rank test found significant differences (p=0,001) between the screw loosening and presence of mucositis. Conclusions: The cemented-retained restorations seem to prevent screw loosening, but the presence of cement seem to increase the complications around the soft tissues, however in the screw-retained restorations the presence of mucositis and peri-implantitis are lower than cemented-retained restorations. The incidence of fracture of ceramic veneering was similar in both groups. Key words:Screw-retained restorations, cemented-retained restorations, screw loosening, peri-implant diseases and fracture ceramic veneering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4368026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43680262015-03-25 Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years Ferreiroa, Alberto Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Pradíes, Guillermo Sola-Ruiz, María-Fernanda Agustín-Panadero, Rubén J Clin Exp Dent Research Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and compare the appearance of different mechanical and biological complications, in screw-retained and cemented-retained single-tooth implant-supported restorations localized in the molar mandibular region, over a period of 1 to 4 years. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out with a total of eighty implant-supported restorations, which were placed in eighty patients for prosthetic rehabilitation of a mandibular molar. Forty patients were rehabilitated with a cemented-retained restoration and the other forty with a screw-retained restoration. The presence of the following complications was recorded for both types of prostheses: Fractures of the ceramic veneering, loosening screws, mucositis and peri-implantitis. Debonding of the restoration was analyzed in the cemented-retained restoration group. The clinical survival of crowns was analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier test and the clinical complications were compared, using a Student t test and Log-rank test. Results: 27 patients registered some complication. The average rate of complications was 37,5% for cemented-retained restorations and 30% for screw-retained restorations. The complications more common in the cemented-retained restoration were the presence of mucositis (14,87%), while in the screw-retained restorations was the loosening screw (20%). Student t test and Log-Rank test found significant differences (p=0,001) between the screw loosening and presence of mucositis. Conclusions: The cemented-retained restorations seem to prevent screw loosening, but the presence of cement seem to increase the complications around the soft tissues, however in the screw-retained restorations the presence of mucositis and peri-implantitis are lower than cemented-retained restorations. The incidence of fracture of ceramic veneering was similar in both groups. Key words:Screw-retained restorations, cemented-retained restorations, screw loosening, peri-implant diseases and fracture ceramic veneering. Medicina Oral S.L. 2015-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4368026/ /pubmed/25810850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51708 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ferreiroa, Alberto Peñarrocha-Diago, Miguel Pradíes, Guillermo Sola-Ruiz, María-Fernanda Agustín-Panadero, Rubén Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title | Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title_full | Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title_fullStr | Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title_short | Cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: A retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
title_sort | cemented and screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth
restorations in the molar mandibular region: a retrospective
comparison study after an observation period of 1 to 4 years |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiroaalberto cementedandscrewretainedimplantsupportedsingletoothrestorationsinthemolarmandibularregionaretrospectivecomparisonstudyafteranobservationperiodof1to4years AT penarrochadiagomiguel cementedandscrewretainedimplantsupportedsingletoothrestorationsinthemolarmandibularregionaretrospectivecomparisonstudyafteranobservationperiodof1to4years AT pradiesguillermo cementedandscrewretainedimplantsupportedsingletoothrestorationsinthemolarmandibularregionaretrospectivecomparisonstudyafteranobservationperiodof1to4years AT solaruizmariafernanda cementedandscrewretainedimplantsupportedsingletoothrestorationsinthemolarmandibularregionaretrospectivecomparisonstudyafteranobservationperiodof1to4years AT agustinpanaderoruben cementedandscrewretainedimplantsupportedsingletoothrestorationsinthemolarmandibularregionaretrospectivecomparisonstudyafteranobservationperiodof1to4years |