Cargando…

Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Intervention studies for children at risk of dyslexia have typically been delivered preschool, and show short-term effects on letter knowledge and phoneme awareness, with little transfer to literacy. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a reading and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duff, Fiona J, Hulme, Charles, Grainger, Katy, Hardwick, Samantha J, Miles, Jeremy NV, Snowling, Margaret J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12257
_version_ 1782362618746372096
author Duff, Fiona J
Hulme, Charles
Grainger, Katy
Hardwick, Samantha J
Miles, Jeremy NV
Snowling, Margaret J
author_facet Duff, Fiona J
Hulme, Charles
Grainger, Katy
Hardwick, Samantha J
Miles, Jeremy NV
Snowling, Margaret J
author_sort Duff, Fiona J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intervention studies for children at risk of dyslexia have typically been delivered preschool, and show short-term effects on letter knowledge and phoneme awareness, with little transfer to literacy. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a reading and language intervention for 6-year-old children identified by research criteria as being at risk of dyslexia (n = 56), and their school-identified peers (n = 89). An Experimental group received two 9-week blocks of daily intervention delivered by trained teaching assistants; the Control group received 9 weeks of typical classroom instruction, followed by 9 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Following mixed effects regression models and path analyses, small-to-moderate effects were shown on letter knowledge, phoneme awareness and taught vocabulary. However, these were fragile and short lived, and there was no reliable effect on the primary outcome of word-level reading. CONCLUSIONS: This new intervention was theoretically motivated and based on previous successful interventions, yet failed to show reliable effects on language and literacy measures following a rigorous evaluation. We suggest that the intervention may have been too short to yield improvements in oral language; and that literacy instruction in and beyond the classroom may have weakened training effects. We argue that reporting of null results makes an important contribution in terms of raising standards both of trial reporting and educational practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4368377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43683772015-03-25 Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial Duff, Fiona J Hulme, Charles Grainger, Katy Hardwick, Samantha J Miles, Jeremy NV Snowling, Margaret J J Child Psychol Psychiatry Original Articles BACKGROUND: Intervention studies for children at risk of dyslexia have typically been delivered preschool, and show short-term effects on letter knowledge and phoneme awareness, with little transfer to literacy. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a reading and language intervention for 6-year-old children identified by research criteria as being at risk of dyslexia (n = 56), and their school-identified peers (n = 89). An Experimental group received two 9-week blocks of daily intervention delivered by trained teaching assistants; the Control group received 9 weeks of typical classroom instruction, followed by 9 weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Following mixed effects regression models and path analyses, small-to-moderate effects were shown on letter knowledge, phoneme awareness and taught vocabulary. However, these were fragile and short lived, and there was no reliable effect on the primary outcome of word-level reading. CONCLUSIONS: This new intervention was theoretically motivated and based on previous successful interventions, yet failed to show reliable effects on language and literacy measures following a rigorous evaluation. We suggest that the intervention may have been too short to yield improvements in oral language; and that literacy instruction in and beyond the classroom may have weakened training effects. We argue that reporting of null results makes an important contribution in terms of raising standards both of trial reporting and educational practice. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4368377/ /pubmed/24836914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12257 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Duff, Fiona J
Hulme, Charles
Grainger, Katy
Hardwick, Samantha J
Miles, Jeremy NV
Snowling, Margaret J
Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12257
work_keys_str_mv AT dufffionaj readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hulmecharles readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT graingerkaty readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hardwicksamanthaj readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT milesjeremynv readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT snowlingmargaretj readingandlanguageinterventionforchildrenatriskofdyslexiaarandomisedcontrolledtrial