Cargando…

The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The performance of pocket mobile ultrasound devices (PUDs) is comparable with that of standard ultrasonography, whereas the accuracy of a physical examination is often poor requiring further tests to assess diagnostic hypotheses. Adding the use of PUD to physical examination could lead t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colli, Agostino, Prati, Daniele, Fraquelli, Mirella, Segato, Sergio, Vescovi, Pier Paolo, Colombo, Fabrizio, Balduini, Carlo, Della Valle, Serena, Casazza, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122181
_version_ 1782362672526786560
author Colli, Agostino
Prati, Daniele
Fraquelli, Mirella
Segato, Sergio
Vescovi, Pier Paolo
Colombo, Fabrizio
Balduini, Carlo
Della Valle, Serena
Casazza, Giovanni
author_facet Colli, Agostino
Prati, Daniele
Fraquelli, Mirella
Segato, Sergio
Vescovi, Pier Paolo
Colombo, Fabrizio
Balduini, Carlo
Della Valle, Serena
Casazza, Giovanni
author_sort Colli, Agostino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The performance of pocket mobile ultrasound devices (PUDs) is comparable with that of standard ultrasonography, whereas the accuracy of a physical examination is often poor requiring further tests to assess diagnostic hypotheses. Adding the use of PUD to physical examination could lead to an incremental benefit. AIM: We assessed whether the use of PUD in the context of physical examination can reduce the prescription of additional tests when used by physicians in different clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted a cohort impact study in four hospital medical wards, one gastroenterological outpatient clinic, and 90 general practices in the same geographical area. The study involved 135 physicians who used PUD, after a short predefined training course, to examine 1962 consecutive patients with one of 10 diagnostic hypotheses: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, urinary retention, urinary stones, gallstones, biliary-duct dilation, splenomegaly, abdominal mass, abdominal aortic aneurysm. According to the physicians’ judgment, PUD examination could rule out or in the diagnostic hypothesis or require further testing; the concordance with the final diagnosis was assessed. The main outcome was the proportion of cases in which additional tests were required after PUD. The PUD diagnostic accuracy was assessed in patients submitted to further testing. FINDINGS: The 1962 patients included 37% in-patients, 26% gastroenterology outpatients, 37% from general practices. Further testing after PUD examination was deemed unnecessary in 63%. Only 5% of patients with negative PUD not referred for further testing were classified false negatives with respect to the final diagnosis. In patients undergoing further tests, the sensitivity was 91%, and the specificity 83%. CONCLUSIONS: After a simple and short training course, a PUD examination can be used in addition to a physical examination to improve the answer to ten common clinical questions concerning in- and outpatients, and can reduce the need for further testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4368724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43687242015-03-27 The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study Colli, Agostino Prati, Daniele Fraquelli, Mirella Segato, Sergio Vescovi, Pier Paolo Colombo, Fabrizio Balduini, Carlo Della Valle, Serena Casazza, Giovanni PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The performance of pocket mobile ultrasound devices (PUDs) is comparable with that of standard ultrasonography, whereas the accuracy of a physical examination is often poor requiring further tests to assess diagnostic hypotheses. Adding the use of PUD to physical examination could lead to an incremental benefit. AIM: We assessed whether the use of PUD in the context of physical examination can reduce the prescription of additional tests when used by physicians in different clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted a cohort impact study in four hospital medical wards, one gastroenterological outpatient clinic, and 90 general practices in the same geographical area. The study involved 135 physicians who used PUD, after a short predefined training course, to examine 1962 consecutive patients with one of 10 diagnostic hypotheses: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, urinary retention, urinary stones, gallstones, biliary-duct dilation, splenomegaly, abdominal mass, abdominal aortic aneurysm. According to the physicians’ judgment, PUD examination could rule out or in the diagnostic hypothesis or require further testing; the concordance with the final diagnosis was assessed. The main outcome was the proportion of cases in which additional tests were required after PUD. The PUD diagnostic accuracy was assessed in patients submitted to further testing. FINDINGS: The 1962 patients included 37% in-patients, 26% gastroenterology outpatients, 37% from general practices. Further testing after PUD examination was deemed unnecessary in 63%. Only 5% of patients with negative PUD not referred for further testing were classified false negatives with respect to the final diagnosis. In patients undergoing further tests, the sensitivity was 91%, and the specificity 83%. CONCLUSIONS: After a simple and short training course, a PUD examination can be used in addition to a physical examination to improve the answer to ten common clinical questions concerning in- and outpatients, and can reduce the need for further testing. Public Library of Science 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4368724/ /pubmed/25793296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122181 Text en © 2015 Colli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colli, Agostino
Prati, Daniele
Fraquelli, Mirella
Segato, Sergio
Vescovi, Pier Paolo
Colombo, Fabrizio
Balduini, Carlo
Della Valle, Serena
Casazza, Giovanni
The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title_full The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title_short The Use of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound Device Improves Physical Examination: Results of an In- and Outpatient Cohort Study
title_sort use of a pocket-sized ultrasound device improves physical examination: results of an in- and outpatient cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122181
work_keys_str_mv AT colliagostino theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT pratidaniele theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT fraquellimirella theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT segatosergio theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT vescovipierpaolo theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT colombofabrizio theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT balduinicarlo theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT dellavalleserena theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT casazzagiovanni theuseofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT colliagostino useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT pratidaniele useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT fraquellimirella useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT segatosergio useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT vescovipierpaolo useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT colombofabrizio useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT balduinicarlo useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT dellavalleserena useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy
AT casazzagiovanni useofapocketsizedultrasounddeviceimprovesphysicalexaminationresultsofaninandoutpatientcohortstudy