Cargando…
Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVES: (1) To explain general practitioners’ (GPs’) approaches to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and overdiagnosis; (2) to explain how GPs reason about their PSA testing routines and (3) to explain how these routines influence GPs’ personal experience as clinicians. SETTING: Primary ca...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25783420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006367 |
_version_ | 1782362718441832448 |
---|---|
author | Pickles, Kristen Carter, Stacy M Rychetnik, Lucie |
author_facet | Pickles, Kristen Carter, Stacy M Rychetnik, Lucie |
author_sort | Pickles, Kristen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: (1) To explain general practitioners’ (GPs’) approaches to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and overdiagnosis; (2) to explain how GPs reason about their PSA testing routines and (3) to explain how these routines influence GPs’ personal experience as clinicians. SETTING: Primary care practices in Australia including men's health clinics and rural practices with variable access to urology services. PARTICIPANTS: 32 urban and rural GPs within Australia. We included GPs of varying ages, gender (11 female), clinical experience and patient populations. All GPs interested in participating in the study were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data were analysed using grounded theory methods to determine how and why GPs provide (or do not provide) PSA testing to their asymptomatic male patients. RESULTS: We observed patterned variation in GP practice, and identified four heuristics to describe GP preference for, and approaches to, PSA testing and overdiagnosis: (1) GPs who prioritised avoiding underdiagnosis, (2) GPs who weighed underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis case by case, (3) GPs who prioritised avoiding overdiagnosis and (4) GPs who did not engage with overdiagnosis at all. The heuristics guided GPs’ Routine Practice (usual testing, communication and responses to patient request). The heuristics also reflected GPs’ different Practice Rationales (drawing on experience, medicolegal obligations, guidelines and evidence) and produced different Practice Outcomes (GPs’ experiences of the consequences of their PSA testing decisions). Some of these heuristics were more responsive to patient preferences than others. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in GPs’ PSA testing practices is strongly related to their approach to overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Men receive very different care depending on their GP's reasoning and practice preferences. Future policy to address overdiagnosis will be more likely to succeed if it responds to these patterned variations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4368999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43689992015-03-26 Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study Pickles, Kristen Carter, Stacy M Rychetnik, Lucie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: (1) To explain general practitioners’ (GPs’) approaches to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and overdiagnosis; (2) to explain how GPs reason about their PSA testing routines and (3) to explain how these routines influence GPs’ personal experience as clinicians. SETTING: Primary care practices in Australia including men's health clinics and rural practices with variable access to urology services. PARTICIPANTS: 32 urban and rural GPs within Australia. We included GPs of varying ages, gender (11 female), clinical experience and patient populations. All GPs interested in participating in the study were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data were analysed using grounded theory methods to determine how and why GPs provide (or do not provide) PSA testing to their asymptomatic male patients. RESULTS: We observed patterned variation in GP practice, and identified four heuristics to describe GP preference for, and approaches to, PSA testing and overdiagnosis: (1) GPs who prioritised avoiding underdiagnosis, (2) GPs who weighed underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis case by case, (3) GPs who prioritised avoiding overdiagnosis and (4) GPs who did not engage with overdiagnosis at all. The heuristics guided GPs’ Routine Practice (usual testing, communication and responses to patient request). The heuristics also reflected GPs’ different Practice Rationales (drawing on experience, medicolegal obligations, guidelines and evidence) and produced different Practice Outcomes (GPs’ experiences of the consequences of their PSA testing decisions). Some of these heuristics were more responsive to patient preferences than others. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in GPs’ PSA testing practices is strongly related to their approach to overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Men receive very different care depending on their GP's reasoning and practice preferences. Future policy to address overdiagnosis will be more likely to succeed if it responds to these patterned variations. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4368999/ /pubmed/25783420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006367 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Pickles, Kristen Carter, Stacy M Rychetnik, Lucie Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title | Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title_full | Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title_short | Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
title_sort | doctors’ approaches to psa testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4368999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25783420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pickleskristen doctorsapproachestopsatestingandoverdiagnosisinprimaryhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT carterstacym doctorsapproachestopsatestingandoverdiagnosisinprimaryhealthcareaqualitativestudy AT rychetniklucie doctorsapproachestopsatestingandoverdiagnosisinprimaryhealthcareaqualitativestudy |