Cargando…

Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions

Accurate knowledge about size and shape of the body derived from somatosensation is important to locate one’s own body in space. The internal representation of these body metrics (body model) has been assessed by contrasting the distortions of participants’ body estimates across two types of tasks (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saulton, Aurelie, Dodds, Trevor J., Bülthoff, Heinrich H., de la Rosa, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4221-0
_version_ 1782362746652721152
author Saulton, Aurelie
Dodds, Trevor J.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
de la Rosa, Stephan
author_facet Saulton, Aurelie
Dodds, Trevor J.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
de la Rosa, Stephan
author_sort Saulton, Aurelie
collection PubMed
description Accurate knowledge about size and shape of the body derived from somatosensation is important to locate one’s own body in space. The internal representation of these body metrics (body model) has been assessed by contrasting the distortions of participants’ body estimates across two types of tasks (localization task vs. template matching task). Here, we examined to which extent this contrast is linked to the human body. We compared participants’ shape estimates of their own hand and non-corporeal objects (rake, post-it pad, CD-box) between a localization task and a template matching task. While most items were perceived accurately in the visual template matching task, they appeared to be distorted in the localization task. All items’ distortions were characterized by larger length underestimation compared to width. This pattern of distortion was maintained across orientation for the rake item only, suggesting that the biases measured on the rake were bound to an item-centric reference frame. This was previously assumed to be the case only for the hand. Although similar results can be found between non-corporeal items and the hand, the hand appears significantly more distorted than other items in the localization task. Therefore, we conclude that the magnitude of the distortions measured in the localization task is specific to the hand. Our results are in line with the idea that the localization task for the hand measures contributions of both an implicit body model that is not utilized in landmark localization with objects and other factors that are common to objects and the hand. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4221-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4369293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43692932015-03-26 Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions Saulton, Aurelie Dodds, Trevor J. Bülthoff, Heinrich H. de la Rosa, Stephan Exp Brain Res Research Article Accurate knowledge about size and shape of the body derived from somatosensation is important to locate one’s own body in space. The internal representation of these body metrics (body model) has been assessed by contrasting the distortions of participants’ body estimates across two types of tasks (localization task vs. template matching task). Here, we examined to which extent this contrast is linked to the human body. We compared participants’ shape estimates of their own hand and non-corporeal objects (rake, post-it pad, CD-box) between a localization task and a template matching task. While most items were perceived accurately in the visual template matching task, they appeared to be distorted in the localization task. All items’ distortions were characterized by larger length underestimation compared to width. This pattern of distortion was maintained across orientation for the rake item only, suggesting that the biases measured on the rake were bound to an item-centric reference frame. This was previously assumed to be the case only for the hand. Although similar results can be found between non-corporeal items and the hand, the hand appears significantly more distorted than other items in the localization task. Therefore, we conclude that the magnitude of the distortions measured in the localization task is specific to the hand. Our results are in line with the idea that the localization task for the hand measures contributions of both an implicit body model that is not utilized in landmark localization with objects and other factors that are common to objects and the hand. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4221-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4369293/ /pubmed/25678309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4221-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
spellingShingle Research Article
Saulton, Aurelie
Dodds, Trevor J.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
de la Rosa, Stephan
Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title_full Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title_fullStr Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title_full_unstemmed Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title_short Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
title_sort objects exhibit body model like shape distortions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4221-0
work_keys_str_mv AT saultonaurelie objectsexhibitbodymodellikeshapedistortions
AT doddstrevorj objectsexhibitbodymodellikeshapedistortions
AT bulthoffheinrichh objectsexhibitbodymodellikeshapedistortions
AT delarosastephan objectsexhibitbodymodellikeshapedistortions