Cargando…

Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus

BACKGROUND: Influenza virus infections are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in both pediatric and adult populations worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is necessary for appropriate patient management during the influenza season and for optimal utilization of anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurtado, Juan Carlos, Mosquera, Maria Mar, de Lazzari, Elisa, Martínez, Esteban, Torner, Nuria, Isanta, Ricard, de Molina, Patricia, Pumarola, Tomás, Marcos, Maria Angeles, Estape, Jordi Vila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0775-5
_version_ 1782362758421938176
author Hurtado, Juan Carlos
Mosquera, Maria Mar
de Lazzari, Elisa
Martínez, Esteban
Torner, Nuria
Isanta, Ricard
de Molina, Patricia
Pumarola, Tomás
Marcos, Maria Angeles
Estape, Jordi Vila
author_facet Hurtado, Juan Carlos
Mosquera, Maria Mar
de Lazzari, Elisa
Martínez, Esteban
Torner, Nuria
Isanta, Ricard
de Molina, Patricia
Pumarola, Tomás
Marcos, Maria Angeles
Estape, Jordi Vila
author_sort Hurtado, Juan Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Influenza virus infections are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in both pediatric and adult populations worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is necessary for appropriate patient management during the influenza season and for optimal utilization of anti-influenza therapy. We prospectively tested the accuracy of a simple and rapid diagnostic method. METHODS: Ninety-eight samples (nasal and pharyngeal swabs) from patients with upper respiratory tract infection symptoms who presented to primary healthcare centres in Barcelona (Spain) were prospectively analyzed. The samples were collected as part of influenza surveillance program. Samples that had enough volume to make the new test after aliquoting the amount needed to perform routine tests were included. None of the samples were pre-selected as a result of their status in relation to influenza virus. Samples were analyzed by in-house real-time PCR and Alere™ i Influenza A & B (Alere™ i), which uses isothermal amplification of nucleic acids for the qualitative detection of influenza A and B in nasal swabs transported in viral transport media. The two techniques were compared by positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA). Statistical analysis was performed with Stata. RESULTS: Of the 98 samples analysed 90 were concordant; 46 (46.9%) were positive and 44 (44.9%) were negative. Five samples showed invalid results with the Alere™ i test and could be not re-tested due to insufficient sample volume and were not included in the final statistical analysis. In the 93 remaining samples, the Alere™ i test showed 97% of accuracy having correctly classified 90 samples. We obtained discordant results in 3 samples (3%). The PPA was 93.8% for influenza A and 94.1% for influenza B, and NPA was 100% for influenza A and influenza B virus. In addition, the Alere™ i was very rapid (15 minutes or less) and extremely easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: The Alere™ i test provided a good correlation compared to the real-time PCR test for the diagnosis of influenza. Since this method can be performed in minutes, it allows immediate, accurate clinical decisions to prescribe appropriate antiviral treatment or isolation of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4369360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43693602015-03-23 Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus Hurtado, Juan Carlos Mosquera, Maria Mar de Lazzari, Elisa Martínez, Esteban Torner, Nuria Isanta, Ricard de Molina, Patricia Pumarola, Tomás Marcos, Maria Angeles Estape, Jordi Vila BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Influenza virus infections are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in both pediatric and adult populations worldwide. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is necessary for appropriate patient management during the influenza season and for optimal utilization of anti-influenza therapy. We prospectively tested the accuracy of a simple and rapid diagnostic method. METHODS: Ninety-eight samples (nasal and pharyngeal swabs) from patients with upper respiratory tract infection symptoms who presented to primary healthcare centres in Barcelona (Spain) were prospectively analyzed. The samples were collected as part of influenza surveillance program. Samples that had enough volume to make the new test after aliquoting the amount needed to perform routine tests were included. None of the samples were pre-selected as a result of their status in relation to influenza virus. Samples were analyzed by in-house real-time PCR and Alere™ i Influenza A & B (Alere™ i), which uses isothermal amplification of nucleic acids for the qualitative detection of influenza A and B in nasal swabs transported in viral transport media. The two techniques were compared by positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA). Statistical analysis was performed with Stata. RESULTS: Of the 98 samples analysed 90 were concordant; 46 (46.9%) were positive and 44 (44.9%) were negative. Five samples showed invalid results with the Alere™ i test and could be not re-tested due to insufficient sample volume and were not included in the final statistical analysis. In the 93 remaining samples, the Alere™ i test showed 97% of accuracy having correctly classified 90 samples. We obtained discordant results in 3 samples (3%). The PPA was 93.8% for influenza A and 94.1% for influenza B, and NPA was 100% for influenza A and influenza B virus. In addition, the Alere™ i was very rapid (15 minutes or less) and extremely easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: The Alere™ i test provided a good correlation compared to the real-time PCR test for the diagnosis of influenza. Since this method can be performed in minutes, it allows immediate, accurate clinical decisions to prescribe appropriate antiviral treatment or isolation of patients. BioMed Central 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4369360/ /pubmed/25656393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0775-5 Text en © Hurtado et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hurtado, Juan Carlos
Mosquera, Maria Mar
de Lazzari, Elisa
Martínez, Esteban
Torner, Nuria
Isanta, Ricard
de Molina, Patricia
Pumarola, Tomás
Marcos, Maria Angeles
Estape, Jordi Vila
Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title_full Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title_fullStr Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title_short Evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
title_sort evaluation of a new, rapid, simple test for the detection of influenza virus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0775-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtadojuancarlos evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT mosqueramariamar evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT delazzarielisa evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT martinezesteban evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT tornernuria evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT isantaricard evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT demolinapatricia evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT pumarolatomas evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT marcosmariaangeles evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus
AT estapejordivila evaluationofanewrapidsimpletestforthedetectionofinfluenzavirus