Cargando…

Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify the cost burden of unintended pregnancies (UPs) in Norway, and to estimate the proportion of costs due to imperfect contraceptive adherence. Potential cost savings that could arise from increased uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Nathaniel, Schlueter, Max, Lowin, Julia, Lekander, Ingrid, Filonenko, Anna, Trussell, James, Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100878
_version_ 1782362763243290624
author Henry, Nathaniel
Schlueter, Max
Lowin, Julia
Lekander, Ingrid
Filonenko, Anna
Trussell, James
Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
author_facet Henry, Nathaniel
Schlueter, Max
Lowin, Julia
Lekander, Ingrid
Filonenko, Anna
Trussell, James
Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
author_sort Henry, Nathaniel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify the cost burden of unintended pregnancies (UPs) in Norway, and to estimate the proportion of costs due to imperfect contraceptive adherence. Potential cost savings that could arise from increased uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) were also investigated. METHODS: An economic model was constructed to estimate the total number of UPs and associated costs in women aged 15–24 years. Adherence-related UP was estimated using ‘perfect use’ and ‘typical use’ contraceptive failure rates. Potential savings from increased use of LARC were projected by comparing current costs to projected costs following a 5% increase in LARC uptake. RESULTS: Total costs from UP in women aged 15–24 years were estimated to be 164 million Norwegian Kroner (NOK), of which 81.7% were projected to be due to imperfect contraceptive adherence. A 5% increase in LARC uptake was estimated to generate cost savings of NOK 7.2 million in this group. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of UP in Norway is substantial, with a large proportion of this cost arising from imperfect contraceptive adherence. Increased LARC uptake may reduce the UP incidence and generate cost savings for both the health care payer and contraceptive user.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4369438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43694382015-04-13 Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception Henry, Nathaniel Schlueter, Max Lowin, Julia Lekander, Ingrid Filonenko, Anna Trussell, James Skjeldestad, Finn Egil J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify the cost burden of unintended pregnancies (UPs) in Norway, and to estimate the proportion of costs due to imperfect contraceptive adherence. Potential cost savings that could arise from increased uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) were also investigated. METHODS: An economic model was constructed to estimate the total number of UPs and associated costs in women aged 15–24 years. Adherence-related UP was estimated using ‘perfect use’ and ‘typical use’ contraceptive failure rates. Potential savings from increased use of LARC were projected by comparing current costs to projected costs following a 5% increase in LARC uptake. RESULTS: Total costs from UP in women aged 15–24 years were estimated to be 164 million Norwegian Kroner (NOK), of which 81.7% were projected to be due to imperfect contraceptive adherence. A 5% increase in LARC uptake was estimated to generate cost savings of NOK 7.2 million in this group. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of UP in Norway is substantial, with a large proportion of this cost arising from imperfect contraceptive adherence. Increased LARC uptake may reduce the UP incidence and generate cost savings for both the health care payer and contraceptive user. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4369438/ /pubmed/25537792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100878 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Article
Henry, Nathaniel
Schlueter, Max
Lowin, Julia
Lekander, Ingrid
Filonenko, Anna
Trussell, James
Skjeldestad, Finn Egil
Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title_full Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title_fullStr Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title_full_unstemmed Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title_short Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
title_sort cost of unintended pregnancy in norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100878
work_keys_str_mv AT henrynathaniel costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT schluetermax costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT lowinjulia costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT lekanderingrid costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT filonenkoanna costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT trusselljames costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception
AT skjeldestadfinnegil costofunintendedpregnancyinnorwayaroleforlongactingreversiblecontraception