Cargando…
Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach
BACKGROUND: The move towards increased transparency around clinical trials is welcome. Much focus has been on under-reporting of trials and access to individual patient data to allow independent verification of findings. There are many other good reasons for data sharing from clinical trials. We des...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6 |
_version_ | 1782362790504169472 |
---|---|
author | Sydes, Matthew R Johnson, Anthony L Meredith, Sarah K Rauchenberger, Mary South, Annabelle Parmar, Mahesh KB |
author_facet | Sydes, Matthew R Johnson, Anthony L Meredith, Sarah K Rauchenberger, Mary South, Annabelle Parmar, Mahesh KB |
author_sort | Sydes, Matthew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The move towards increased transparency around clinical trials is welcome. Much focus has been on under-reporting of trials and access to individual patient data to allow independent verification of findings. There are many other good reasons for data sharing from clinical trials. We describe some key issues in data sharing, including the challenges of open access to data. These include issues in consent and disclosure; risks in identification, including self-identification; risks in distorting data to prevent self-identification; and risks in analysis. These risks have led us to develop a controlled access policy, which safeguards the rights of patients entered in our trials, guards the intellectual property rights of the original researchers who designed the trial and collected the data, provides a barrier against unnecessary duplication, and ensures that researchers have the necessary resources and skills to analyse the data. METHODS: We briefly discuss the practicalities of our current approach to data sharing, including ensuring that data are discoverable and how to deal with old studies. We describe data sharing activities at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit. RESULTS: One hundred and three data sharing activities were logged from 2012 to 2014 from external and internal applicants. The motivations are varied, but none have been for replication of the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: For any request to share data, we note the important role of independent reviewers as well as reviewers who know the study well, and present some of the key questions that all reviewers should ask when deciding whether a request is reasonable. We consider the responsibilities of all parties. We highlight the potential for opportunity costs. Clinical trial data should be shared for reasonable requests but there are many practical issues that must be explicitly considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4369803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43698032015-03-24 Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach Sydes, Matthew R Johnson, Anthony L Meredith, Sarah K Rauchenberger, Mary South, Annabelle Parmar, Mahesh KB Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: The move towards increased transparency around clinical trials is welcome. Much focus has been on under-reporting of trials and access to individual patient data to allow independent verification of findings. There are many other good reasons for data sharing from clinical trials. We describe some key issues in data sharing, including the challenges of open access to data. These include issues in consent and disclosure; risks in identification, including self-identification; risks in distorting data to prevent self-identification; and risks in analysis. These risks have led us to develop a controlled access policy, which safeguards the rights of patients entered in our trials, guards the intellectual property rights of the original researchers who designed the trial and collected the data, provides a barrier against unnecessary duplication, and ensures that researchers have the necessary resources and skills to analyse the data. METHODS: We briefly discuss the practicalities of our current approach to data sharing, including ensuring that data are discoverable and how to deal with old studies. We describe data sharing activities at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit. RESULTS: One hundred and three data sharing activities were logged from 2012 to 2014 from external and internal applicants. The motivations are varied, but none have been for replication of the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: For any request to share data, we note the important role of independent reviewers as well as reviewers who know the study well, and present some of the key questions that all reviewers should ask when deciding whether a request is reasonable. We consider the responsibilities of all parties. We highlight the potential for opportunity costs. Clinical trial data should be shared for reasonable requests but there are many practical issues that must be explicitly considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4369803/ /pubmed/25872927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6 Text en © Sydes et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Sydes, Matthew R Johnson, Anthony L Meredith, Sarah K Rauchenberger, Mary South, Annabelle Parmar, Mahesh KB Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title | Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title_full | Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title_fullStr | Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title_short | Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
title_sort | sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sydesmatthewr sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach AT johnsonanthonyl sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach AT meredithsarahk sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach AT rauchenbergermary sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach AT southannabelle sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach AT parmarmaheshkb sharingdatafromclinicaltrialstherationaleforacontrolledaccessapproach |