Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response

Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Datta, Sumona, Sherman, Jonathan M., Bravard, Marjory A., Valencia, Teresa, Gilman, Robert H., Evans, Carlton A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153
_version_ 1782362843014758400
author Datta, Sumona
Sherman, Jonathan M.
Bravard, Marjory A.
Valencia, Teresa
Gilman, Robert H.
Evans, Carlton A.
author_facet Datta, Sumona
Sherman, Jonathan M.
Bravard, Marjory A.
Valencia, Teresa
Gilman, Robert H.
Evans, Carlton A.
author_sort Datta, Sumona
collection PubMed
description Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. To assess treatment response, sputum samples (n = 124) from unselected patients (n = 35) with sputum microscopy–positive tuberculosis were tested pretreatment and after 3, 6, and 9 days of empiric first-line therapy. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy with fluorescein diacetate, quantitative culture, and acid-fast auramine microscopy were all performed in triplicate. Results. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy predicted quantitative culture results such that 76% of results agreed within ±1 logarithm (r(S) = 0.85; P < .0001). In 31 patients with non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, viability and quantitative culture results approximately halved (both 0.27 log reduction, P < .001) daily. For patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and available data, by treatment day 9 there was a >10-fold reduction in viability in 100% (24/24) of cases and quantitative culture in 95% (19/20) of cases. Four other patients subsequently found to have MDR tuberculosis had no significant changes in viability (P = .4) or quantitative culture (P = .6) results during early treatment. The change in viability and quantitative culture results during early treatment differed significantly between patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and those with MDR tuberculosis (both P < .001). Acid-fast microscopy results changed little during early treatment, and this change was similar for non-MDR tuberculosis vs MDR tuberculosis (P = .6). Conclusions. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy is a simple test that within 1 hour predicted quantitative culture results that became available weeks later, rapidly indicating whether patients were responding to tuberculosis therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4370166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43701662015-03-26 Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response Datta, Sumona Sherman, Jonathan M. Bravard, Marjory A. Valencia, Teresa Gilman, Robert H. Evans, Carlton A. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. To assess treatment response, sputum samples (n = 124) from unselected patients (n = 35) with sputum microscopy–positive tuberculosis were tested pretreatment and after 3, 6, and 9 days of empiric first-line therapy. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy with fluorescein diacetate, quantitative culture, and acid-fast auramine microscopy were all performed in triplicate. Results. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy predicted quantitative culture results such that 76% of results agreed within ±1 logarithm (r(S) = 0.85; P < .0001). In 31 patients with non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, viability and quantitative culture results approximately halved (both 0.27 log reduction, P < .001) daily. For patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and available data, by treatment day 9 there was a >10-fold reduction in viability in 100% (24/24) of cases and quantitative culture in 95% (19/20) of cases. Four other patients subsequently found to have MDR tuberculosis had no significant changes in viability (P = .4) or quantitative culture (P = .6) results during early treatment. The change in viability and quantitative culture results during early treatment differed significantly between patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and those with MDR tuberculosis (both P < .001). Acid-fast microscopy results changed little during early treatment, and this change was similar for non-MDR tuberculosis vs MDR tuberculosis (P = .6). Conclusions. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy is a simple test that within 1 hour predicted quantitative culture results that became available weeks later, rapidly indicating whether patients were responding to tuberculosis therapy. Oxford University Press 2015-04-15 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4370166/ /pubmed/25537870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Datta, Sumona
Sherman, Jonathan M.
Bravard, Marjory A.
Valencia, Teresa
Gilman, Robert H.
Evans, Carlton A.
Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
title_sort clinical evaluation of tuberculosis viability microscopy for assessing treatment response
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153
work_keys_str_mv AT dattasumona clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse
AT shermanjonathanm clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse
AT bravardmarjorya clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse
AT valenciateresa clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse
AT gilmanroberth clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse
AT evanscarltona clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse