Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response
Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153 |
_version_ | 1782362843014758400 |
---|---|
author | Datta, Sumona Sherman, Jonathan M. Bravard, Marjory A. Valencia, Teresa Gilman, Robert H. Evans, Carlton A. |
author_facet | Datta, Sumona Sherman, Jonathan M. Bravard, Marjory A. Valencia, Teresa Gilman, Robert H. Evans, Carlton A. |
author_sort | Datta, Sumona |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. To assess treatment response, sputum samples (n = 124) from unselected patients (n = 35) with sputum microscopy–positive tuberculosis were tested pretreatment and after 3, 6, and 9 days of empiric first-line therapy. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy with fluorescein diacetate, quantitative culture, and acid-fast auramine microscopy were all performed in triplicate. Results. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy predicted quantitative culture results such that 76% of results agreed within ±1 logarithm (r(S) = 0.85; P < .0001). In 31 patients with non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, viability and quantitative culture results approximately halved (both 0.27 log reduction, P < .001) daily. For patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and available data, by treatment day 9 there was a >10-fold reduction in viability in 100% (24/24) of cases and quantitative culture in 95% (19/20) of cases. Four other patients subsequently found to have MDR tuberculosis had no significant changes in viability (P = .4) or quantitative culture (P = .6) results during early treatment. The change in viability and quantitative culture results during early treatment differed significantly between patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and those with MDR tuberculosis (both P < .001). Acid-fast microscopy results changed little during early treatment, and this change was similar for non-MDR tuberculosis vs MDR tuberculosis (P = .6). Conclusions. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy is a simple test that within 1 hour predicted quantitative culture results that became available weeks later, rapidly indicating whether patients were responding to tuberculosis therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4370166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43701662015-03-26 Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response Datta, Sumona Sherman, Jonathan M. Bravard, Marjory A. Valencia, Teresa Gilman, Robert H. Evans, Carlton A. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. It is difficult to determine whether early tuberculosis treatment is effective in reducing the infectiousness of patients' sputum, because culture takes weeks and conventional acid-fast sputum microscopy and molecular tests cannot differentiate live from dead tuberculosis. Methods. To assess treatment response, sputum samples (n = 124) from unselected patients (n = 35) with sputum microscopy–positive tuberculosis were tested pretreatment and after 3, 6, and 9 days of empiric first-line therapy. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy with fluorescein diacetate, quantitative culture, and acid-fast auramine microscopy were all performed in triplicate. Results. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy predicted quantitative culture results such that 76% of results agreed within ±1 logarithm (r(S) = 0.85; P < .0001). In 31 patients with non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, viability and quantitative culture results approximately halved (both 0.27 log reduction, P < .001) daily. For patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and available data, by treatment day 9 there was a >10-fold reduction in viability in 100% (24/24) of cases and quantitative culture in 95% (19/20) of cases. Four other patients subsequently found to have MDR tuberculosis had no significant changes in viability (P = .4) or quantitative culture (P = .6) results during early treatment. The change in viability and quantitative culture results during early treatment differed significantly between patients with non-MDR tuberculosis and those with MDR tuberculosis (both P < .001). Acid-fast microscopy results changed little during early treatment, and this change was similar for non-MDR tuberculosis vs MDR tuberculosis (P = .6). Conclusions. Tuberculosis quantitative viability microscopy is a simple test that within 1 hour predicted quantitative culture results that became available weeks later, rapidly indicating whether patients were responding to tuberculosis therapy. Oxford University Press 2015-04-15 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4370166/ /pubmed/25537870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Datta, Sumona Sherman, Jonathan M. Bravard, Marjory A. Valencia, Teresa Gilman, Robert H. Evans, Carlton A. Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title | Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of Tuberculosis Viability Microscopy for Assessing Treatment Response |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of tuberculosis viability microscopy for assessing treatment response |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu1153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dattasumona clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse AT shermanjonathanm clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse AT bravardmarjorya clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse AT valenciateresa clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse AT gilmanroberth clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse AT evanscarltona clinicalevaluationoftuberculosisviabilitymicroscopyforassessingtreatmentresponse |