Cargando…

Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?

BACKGROUND: Blinding trachoma is targeted for elimination by 2020 using the SAFE strategy (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvements). Annual mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a cornerstone of this strategy. If baseline prevalence of clinical signs of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez, Violeta, Gelderblom, Huub C., Mann Flueckiger, Rebecca, Emerson, Paul M., Haddad, Danny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25799168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003610
_version_ 1782362909142155264
author Jimenez, Violeta
Gelderblom, Huub C.
Mann Flueckiger, Rebecca
Emerson, Paul M.
Haddad, Danny
author_facet Jimenez, Violeta
Gelderblom, Huub C.
Mann Flueckiger, Rebecca
Emerson, Paul M.
Haddad, Danny
author_sort Jimenez, Violeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blinding trachoma is targeted for elimination by 2020 using the SAFE strategy (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvements). Annual mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a cornerstone of this strategy. If baseline prevalence of clinical signs of trachomatous inflammation – follicular among 1-9 year-olds (TF1-9) is ≥10% but <30%, the World Health Organization guidelines are for at least 3 annual MDAs; if ≥30%, 5. We assessed the likelihood of achieving the global elimination target of TF1-9 <5% at 3 and 5 year evaluations using program reports. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used the International Trachoma Initiative’s prevalence and treatment database. Of 283 cross-sectional survey pairs with baseline and follow-up data, MDA was conducted in 170 districts. Linear and logistic regression modeling was applied to these to investigate the effect of MDA on baseline prevalence. Reduction to <5% was less likely, though not impossible, at higher baseline TF1-9 prevalences. Increased number of annual MDAs, as well as no skipped MDAs, were significant predictors of reduced TF1-9 at follow-up. The probability of achieving the <5% target was <50% for areas with ≥30% TF1-9 prevalence at baseline, even with 7 or more continuous annual MDAs. CONCLUSIONS: Number of annual MDAs alone appears insufficient to predict program progress; more information on the effects of baseline prevalence, coverage, and underlying environmental and hygienic conditions is needed. Programs should not skip MDAs, and at prevalences >30%, 7 or more annual MDAs may be required to achieve the target. There are five years left before the 2020 deadline to eliminate blinding trachoma. Low endemic settings are poised to succeed in their elimination goals. However, newly-identified high prevalence districts warrant immediate inclusion in the global program. Intensified application of the SAFE strategy is needed in order to guarantee blinding trachoma elimination by 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4370651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43706512015-04-04 Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough? Jimenez, Violeta Gelderblom, Huub C. Mann Flueckiger, Rebecca Emerson, Paul M. Haddad, Danny PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Blinding trachoma is targeted for elimination by 2020 using the SAFE strategy (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvements). Annual mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a cornerstone of this strategy. If baseline prevalence of clinical signs of trachomatous inflammation – follicular among 1-9 year-olds (TF1-9) is ≥10% but <30%, the World Health Organization guidelines are for at least 3 annual MDAs; if ≥30%, 5. We assessed the likelihood of achieving the global elimination target of TF1-9 <5% at 3 and 5 year evaluations using program reports. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used the International Trachoma Initiative’s prevalence and treatment database. Of 283 cross-sectional survey pairs with baseline and follow-up data, MDA was conducted in 170 districts. Linear and logistic regression modeling was applied to these to investigate the effect of MDA on baseline prevalence. Reduction to <5% was less likely, though not impossible, at higher baseline TF1-9 prevalences. Increased number of annual MDAs, as well as no skipped MDAs, were significant predictors of reduced TF1-9 at follow-up. The probability of achieving the <5% target was <50% for areas with ≥30% TF1-9 prevalence at baseline, even with 7 or more continuous annual MDAs. CONCLUSIONS: Number of annual MDAs alone appears insufficient to predict program progress; more information on the effects of baseline prevalence, coverage, and underlying environmental and hygienic conditions is needed. Programs should not skip MDAs, and at prevalences >30%, 7 or more annual MDAs may be required to achieve the target. There are five years left before the 2020 deadline to eliminate blinding trachoma. Low endemic settings are poised to succeed in their elimination goals. However, newly-identified high prevalence districts warrant immediate inclusion in the global program. Intensified application of the SAFE strategy is needed in order to guarantee blinding trachoma elimination by 2020. Public Library of Science 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4370651/ /pubmed/25799168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003610 Text en © 2015 Jimenez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jimenez, Violeta
Gelderblom, Huub C.
Mann Flueckiger, Rebecca
Emerson, Paul M.
Haddad, Danny
Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title_full Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title_fullStr Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title_full_unstemmed Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title_short Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma: How Long Is Not Long Enough?
title_sort mass drug administration for trachoma: how long is not long enough?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25799168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003610
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezvioleta massdrugadministrationfortrachomahowlongisnotlongenough
AT gelderblomhuubc massdrugadministrationfortrachomahowlongisnotlongenough
AT mannflueckigerrebecca massdrugadministrationfortrachomahowlongisnotlongenough
AT emersonpaulm massdrugadministrationfortrachomahowlongisnotlongenough
AT haddaddanny massdrugadministrationfortrachomahowlongisnotlongenough