Cargando…

RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition

Bias is a pervasive problem when characterizing microbial communities. An important source is the difference in lysis efficiencies of different populations, which vary depending on the extraction protocol used. To avoid such biases impacting comparisons between gene and transcript abundances in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, Ann, Chiang, Edna, Schmidt, Marian L., Denef, Vincent J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121659
_version_ 1782362941120577536
author McCarthy, Ann
Chiang, Edna
Schmidt, Marian L.
Denef, Vincent J.
author_facet McCarthy, Ann
Chiang, Edna
Schmidt, Marian L.
Denef, Vincent J.
author_sort McCarthy, Ann
collection PubMed
description Bias is a pervasive problem when characterizing microbial communities. An important source is the difference in lysis efficiencies of different populations, which vary depending on the extraction protocol used. To avoid such biases impacting comparisons between gene and transcript abundances in the environment, the use of one protocol that simultaneously extracts both types of nucleic acids from microbial community samples has gained popularity. However, knowledge regarding tradeoffs to combined nucleic acid extraction protocols is limited, particularly regarding yield and biases in the observed community composition. Here, we evaluated a commercially available protocol for simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA, which we adapted for freshwater microbial community samples that were collected on filters. DNA and RNA yields were comparable to other commonly used, but independent DNA and RNA extraction protocols. RNA protection agents benefited RNA quality, but decreased DNA yields significantly. Choice of extraction protocol influenced the perceived bacterial community composition, with strong method-dependent biases observed for specific phyla such as the Verrucomicrobia. The combined DNA/RNA extraction protocol detected significantly higher levels of Verrucomicrobia than the other protocols, and those higher numbers were confirmed by microscopic analysis. Use of RNA protection agents as well as independent sequencing runs caused a significant shift in community composition as well, albeit smaller than the shift caused by using different extraction protocols. Despite methodological biases, sample origin was the strongest determinant of community composition. However, when the abundance of specific phylogenetic groups is of interest, researchers need to be aware of the biases their methods introduce. This is particularly relevant if different methods are used for DNA and RNA extraction, in addition to using RNA protection agents only for RNA samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4370824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43708242015-04-04 RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition McCarthy, Ann Chiang, Edna Schmidt, Marian L. Denef, Vincent J. PLoS One Research Article Bias is a pervasive problem when characterizing microbial communities. An important source is the difference in lysis efficiencies of different populations, which vary depending on the extraction protocol used. To avoid such biases impacting comparisons between gene and transcript abundances in the environment, the use of one protocol that simultaneously extracts both types of nucleic acids from microbial community samples has gained popularity. However, knowledge regarding tradeoffs to combined nucleic acid extraction protocols is limited, particularly regarding yield and biases in the observed community composition. Here, we evaluated a commercially available protocol for simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA, which we adapted for freshwater microbial community samples that were collected on filters. DNA and RNA yields were comparable to other commonly used, but independent DNA and RNA extraction protocols. RNA protection agents benefited RNA quality, but decreased DNA yields significantly. Choice of extraction protocol influenced the perceived bacterial community composition, with strong method-dependent biases observed for specific phyla such as the Verrucomicrobia. The combined DNA/RNA extraction protocol detected significantly higher levels of Verrucomicrobia than the other protocols, and those higher numbers were confirmed by microscopic analysis. Use of RNA protection agents as well as independent sequencing runs caused a significant shift in community composition as well, albeit smaller than the shift caused by using different extraction protocols. Despite methodological biases, sample origin was the strongest determinant of community composition. However, when the abundance of specific phylogenetic groups is of interest, researchers need to be aware of the biases their methods introduce. This is particularly relevant if different methods are used for DNA and RNA extraction, in addition to using RNA protection agents only for RNA samples. Public Library of Science 2015-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4370824/ /pubmed/25798612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121659 Text en © 2015 McCarthy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCarthy, Ann
Chiang, Edna
Schmidt, Marian L.
Denef, Vincent J.
RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title_full RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title_fullStr RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title_full_unstemmed RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title_short RNA Preservation Agents and Nucleic Acid Extraction Method Bias Perceived Bacterial Community Composition
title_sort rna preservation agents and nucleic acid extraction method bias perceived bacterial community composition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4370824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121659
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthyann rnapreservationagentsandnucleicacidextractionmethodbiasperceivedbacterialcommunitycomposition
AT chiangedna rnapreservationagentsandnucleicacidextractionmethodbiasperceivedbacterialcommunitycomposition
AT schmidtmarianl rnapreservationagentsandnucleicacidextractionmethodbiasperceivedbacterialcommunitycomposition
AT denefvincentj rnapreservationagentsandnucleicacidextractionmethodbiasperceivedbacterialcommunitycomposition