Cargando…
Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and inter...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AcademyHealth
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848598 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114 |
_version_ | 1782363046636683264 |
---|---|
author | Yetisgen, Meliha Klassen, Prescott Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter |
author_facet | Yetisgen, Meliha Klassen, Prescott Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter |
author_sort | Yetisgen, Meliha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and interventional procedures. The data elements abstracted as part of this program cover a wide range of clinical information from patient medical history to details of surgical interventions. METHODS: Statistical and rule-based extractors were developed to automatically abstract data elements. A preprocessing pipeline was created to chunk free-text notes into its sections, sentences, and tokens. The information extracted in this preprocessing step was used by the statistical and rule-based extractors as features. FINDINGS: Performance results for 25 extractors (14 statistical, 11 rule based) are presented. The average f1-scores for 11 rule-based extractors and 14 statistical extractors are 0.785 (min=0.576,max=0.931,std-dev=0.113) and 0.812 (min=0.571,max=0.993,std-dev=0.135) respectively. DISCUSSION: Our error analysis revealed that most extraction errors were due either to data imbalance in the data set or the way the gold standard had been created. CONCLUSION: As future work, more experiments will be conducted with a more comprehensive data set from multiple institutions contributing to the QI project. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4371448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | AcademyHealth |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43714482015-04-06 Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures Yetisgen, Meliha Klassen, Prescott Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter EGEMS (Wash DC) Methods OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and interventional procedures. The data elements abstracted as part of this program cover a wide range of clinical information from patient medical history to details of surgical interventions. METHODS: Statistical and rule-based extractors were developed to automatically abstract data elements. A preprocessing pipeline was created to chunk free-text notes into its sections, sentences, and tokens. The information extracted in this preprocessing step was used by the statistical and rule-based extractors as features. FINDINGS: Performance results for 25 extractors (14 statistical, 11 rule based) are presented. The average f1-scores for 11 rule-based extractors and 14 statistical extractors are 0.785 (min=0.576,max=0.931,std-dev=0.113) and 0.812 (min=0.571,max=0.993,std-dev=0.135) respectively. DISCUSSION: Our error analysis revealed that most extraction errors were due either to data imbalance in the data set or the way the gold standard had been created. CONCLUSION: As future work, more experiments will be conducted with a more comprehensive data set from multiple institutions contributing to the QI project. AcademyHealth 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4371448/ /pubmed/25848598 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114 Text en All eGEMs publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Methods Yetisgen, Meliha Klassen, Prescott Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title | Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title_full | Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title_fullStr | Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title_short | Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures |
title_sort | automating data abstraction in a quality improvement platform for surgical and interventional procedures |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848598 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yetisgenmeliha automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures AT klassenprescott automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures AT tarczyhornochpeter automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures |