Cargando…

Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yetisgen, Meliha, Klassen, Prescott, Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AcademyHealth 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848598
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114
_version_ 1782363046636683264
author Yetisgen, Meliha
Klassen, Prescott
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
author_facet Yetisgen, Meliha
Klassen, Prescott
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
author_sort Yetisgen, Meliha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and interventional procedures. The data elements abstracted as part of this program cover a wide range of clinical information from patient medical history to details of surgical interventions. METHODS: Statistical and rule-based extractors were developed to automatically abstract data elements. A preprocessing pipeline was created to chunk free-text notes into its sections, sentences, and tokens. The information extracted in this preprocessing step was used by the statistical and rule-based extractors as features. FINDINGS: Performance results for 25 extractors (14 statistical, 11 rule based) are presented. The average f1-scores for 11 rule-based extractors and 14 statistical extractors are 0.785 (min=0.576,max=0.931,std-dev=0.113) and 0.812 (min=0.571,max=0.993,std-dev=0.135) respectively. DISCUSSION: Our error analysis revealed that most extraction errors were due either to data imbalance in the data set or the way the gold standard had been created. CONCLUSION: As future work, more experiments will be conducted with a more comprehensive data set from multiple institutions contributing to the QI project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4371448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AcademyHealth
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43714482015-04-06 Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures Yetisgen, Meliha Klassen, Prescott Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter EGEMS (Wash DC) Methods OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a text processing system designed to automate the manual data abstraction process in a quality improvement (QI) program. The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a clinician-led, statewide performance benchmarking QI platform for surgical and interventional procedures. The data elements abstracted as part of this program cover a wide range of clinical information from patient medical history to details of surgical interventions. METHODS: Statistical and rule-based extractors were developed to automatically abstract data elements. A preprocessing pipeline was created to chunk free-text notes into its sections, sentences, and tokens. The information extracted in this preprocessing step was used by the statistical and rule-based extractors as features. FINDINGS: Performance results for 25 extractors (14 statistical, 11 rule based) are presented. The average f1-scores for 11 rule-based extractors and 14 statistical extractors are 0.785 (min=0.576,max=0.931,std-dev=0.113) and 0.812 (min=0.571,max=0.993,std-dev=0.135) respectively. DISCUSSION: Our error analysis revealed that most extraction errors were due either to data imbalance in the data set or the way the gold standard had been created. CONCLUSION: As future work, more experiments will be conducted with a more comprehensive data set from multiple institutions contributing to the QI project. AcademyHealth 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4371448/ /pubmed/25848598 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114 Text en All eGEMs publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Methods
Yetisgen, Meliha
Klassen, Prescott
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title_full Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title_fullStr Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title_short Automating Data Abstraction in a Quality Improvement Platform for Surgical and Interventional Procedures
title_sort automating data abstraction in a quality improvement platform for surgical and interventional procedures
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848598
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1114
work_keys_str_mv AT yetisgenmeliha automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures
AT klassenprescott automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures
AT tarczyhornochpeter automatingdataabstractioninaqualityimprovementplatformforsurgicalandinterventionalprocedures