Cargando…
eGEMs: Pathways to Success for Multisite Clinical Data Research
There are numerous and significant challenges associated with leveraging electronic clinical data (ECD) for purposes beyond treating an individual patient and getting paid for that care. Optimizing this secondary use of clinical data is a key underpinning of many health reform goals and triggers num...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AcademyHealth
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848568 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1041 |
Sumario: | There are numerous and significant challenges associated with leveraging electronic clinical data (ECD) for purposes beyond treating an individual patient and getting paid for that care. Optimizing this secondary use of clinical data is a key underpinning of many health reform goals and triggers numerous issues related to data stewardship and, more broadly, data governance. These challenges often involve legal, policy, and procedural issues related to the access, use, and disclosure of electronic health record (EHR) data for quality improvement and research. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion of health data governance by detailing the experiences of nine multisite research initiatives across the country. The rich set of experiences from these initiatives, as well as a number of resources used by project participants to work through various challenges, are documented and collected here for others wishing to learn from their collective efforts. The paper does not attempt to catalog the full spectrum of governance issues that could potentially surface in the course of multisite research projects using ECD. Rather, the goal was to provide a snapshot in time of data-sharing challenges and navigation strategies, as well as validation that privacy-protective, legally compliant clinical data sharing across sites is currently possible. Finally, the paper also provides a foundation and framing for a broader community resource on governance—a “governance toolkit”—that will create a virtual space for the further discussion and sharing of promising practices. |
---|