Cargando…

Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rarely included in quality monitoring systems, surgeon comparative feedback reports, or registries. We present the design and implementation of a secure website in a federally funded research program—Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Hua, Li, Wenjun, Harrold, Leslie, Ayers, David C., Franklin, Patricia D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AcademyHealth 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848601
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1130
_version_ 1782363057667702784
author Zheng, Hua
Li, Wenjun
Harrold, Leslie
Ayers, David C.
Franklin, Patricia D.
author_facet Zheng, Hua
Li, Wenjun
Harrold, Leslie
Ayers, David C.
Franklin, Patricia D.
author_sort Zheng, Hua
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rarely included in quality monitoring systems, surgeon comparative feedback reports, or registries. We present the design and implementation of a secure website in a federally funded research program—Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR)—to return comparative PRO reports to participating surgeons, in addition to including traditional quality measures, in order to monitor and improve quality and health outcomes. METHODS: The surgeon-specific comparative PRO reports were designed and structured based on user input for content, data elements, integration, and display. Three questions are addressed regarding the knee and hip joint symptom profiles of patients before TJR, as well as outcomes of surgery. The website is organized with a hierarchical structure to display data at national, practice, and individual surgeon levels, and provides a comprehensive site-level executive summary and surgeon-level data reports that can be downloaded. EARLY RESULTS: As of September 2014, over 22,000 patients were enrolled from more than 130 surgeons in 22 states. The reporting website was launched in September 2012 and has been updated quarterly for all surgeons to review their site- and individual-specific outcomes data compared to national benchmarks. DISCUSSION: In this novel system, quarterly comparative surgeon feedback extends beyond traditional measures of complication rates to include PROs of pain relief and functional gain. We anticipate that this enhanced data will facilitate patient-centered quality improvement (QI) and outcomes research from the registry. As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other insurers consider future implementation of PROs, surgeons will increasingly need comparative data by which to self-monitor their practice outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4371516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AcademyHealth
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43715162015-04-06 Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement Zheng, Hua Li, Wenjun Harrold, Leslie Ayers, David C. Franklin, Patricia D. EGEMS (Wash DC) Informatics INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rarely included in quality monitoring systems, surgeon comparative feedback reports, or registries. We present the design and implementation of a secure website in a federally funded research program—Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR)—to return comparative PRO reports to participating surgeons, in addition to including traditional quality measures, in order to monitor and improve quality and health outcomes. METHODS: The surgeon-specific comparative PRO reports were designed and structured based on user input for content, data elements, integration, and display. Three questions are addressed regarding the knee and hip joint symptom profiles of patients before TJR, as well as outcomes of surgery. The website is organized with a hierarchical structure to display data at national, practice, and individual surgeon levels, and provides a comprehensive site-level executive summary and surgeon-level data reports that can be downloaded. EARLY RESULTS: As of September 2014, over 22,000 patients were enrolled from more than 130 surgeons in 22 states. The reporting website was launched in September 2012 and has been updated quarterly for all surgeons to review their site- and individual-specific outcomes data compared to national benchmarks. DISCUSSION: In this novel system, quarterly comparative surgeon feedback extends beyond traditional measures of complication rates to include PROs of pain relief and functional gain. We anticipate that this enhanced data will facilitate patient-centered quality improvement (QI) and outcomes research from the registry. As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other insurers consider future implementation of PROs, surgeons will increasingly need comparative data by which to self-monitor their practice outcomes. AcademyHealth 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4371516/ /pubmed/25848601 http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1130 Text en All eGEMs publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Informatics
Zheng, Hua
Li, Wenjun
Harrold, Leslie
Ayers, David C.
Franklin, Patricia D.
Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title_full Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title_fullStr Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title_short Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement
title_sort web-based comparative patient-reported outcome feedback to support quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research in total joint replacement
topic Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25848601
http://dx.doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1130
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghua webbasedcomparativepatientreportedoutcomefeedbacktosupportqualityimprovementandcomparativeeffectivenessresearchintotaljointreplacement
AT liwenjun webbasedcomparativepatientreportedoutcomefeedbacktosupportqualityimprovementandcomparativeeffectivenessresearchintotaljointreplacement
AT harroldleslie webbasedcomparativepatientreportedoutcomefeedbacktosupportqualityimprovementandcomparativeeffectivenessresearchintotaljointreplacement
AT ayersdavidc webbasedcomparativepatientreportedoutcomefeedbacktosupportqualityimprovementandcomparativeeffectivenessresearchintotaljointreplacement
AT franklinpatriciad webbasedcomparativepatientreportedoutcomefeedbacktosupportqualityimprovementandcomparativeeffectivenessresearchintotaljointreplacement