Cargando…

Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the associations between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and prognostic factors in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to compare these results with those in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: The study included pathologicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Na Young, Kim, Sung Hun, Choi, Bo Bae, Kim, Sung Hoon, Sung, Mi Sook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0522-9
_version_ 1782363066297483264
author Jung, Na Young
Kim, Sung Hun
Choi, Bo Bae
Kim, Sung Hoon
Sung, Mi Sook
author_facet Jung, Na Young
Kim, Sung Hun
Choi, Bo Bae
Kim, Sung Hoon
Sung, Mi Sook
author_sort Jung, Na Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the associations between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and prognostic factors in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to compare these results with those in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: The study included pathologically confirmed ILCs (n = 32) and IDCs (n = 73). We retrospectively evaluated the preoperative (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and measured the SUVmax. The pathologic results were reviewed regarding the size, histological type, histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Ki-67 of the primary tumor. We also compared the associations between the SUVmax and prognostic factors. RESULTS: The mean SUVmax of the ILCs was significantly lower compared with that of the IDCs (P = 0.032). The SUVmax increased with tumor grade (P < 0.001) and was higher with ER negativity compared with ER positivity (P = 0.007) in IDC. The SUVmax was higher with EGFR positivity compared with EGFR negativity (P = 0.013) in IDC and higher with Ki-67 positivity compared with Ki-67 negativity in IDC and ILC (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The SUVmax was not significantly different regarding PR or HER2 for both tumor groups. The correlation between the tumor size and the SUVmax was demonstrated for IDCs (r = 0.57), but not for ILCs (r = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The SUVmax was significantly different according to the tumor grade, ER, EGFR, and Ki-67 for IDCs. The SUVmax exhibited a positive association with Ki-67 in ILC; however, it was not significantly different with other factors, which suggests that the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be limited in ILC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4371618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43716182015-03-25 Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma Jung, Na Young Kim, Sung Hun Choi, Bo Bae Kim, Sung Hoon Sung, Mi Sook World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the associations between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and prognostic factors in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to compare these results with those in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: The study included pathologically confirmed ILCs (n = 32) and IDCs (n = 73). We retrospectively evaluated the preoperative (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and measured the SUVmax. The pathologic results were reviewed regarding the size, histological type, histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Ki-67 of the primary tumor. We also compared the associations between the SUVmax and prognostic factors. RESULTS: The mean SUVmax of the ILCs was significantly lower compared with that of the IDCs (P = 0.032). The SUVmax increased with tumor grade (P < 0.001) and was higher with ER negativity compared with ER positivity (P = 0.007) in IDC. The SUVmax was higher with EGFR positivity compared with EGFR negativity (P = 0.013) in IDC and higher with Ki-67 positivity compared with Ki-67 negativity in IDC and ILC (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The SUVmax was not significantly different regarding PR or HER2 for both tumor groups. The correlation between the tumor size and the SUVmax was demonstrated for IDCs (r = 0.57), but not for ILCs (r = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The SUVmax was significantly different according to the tumor grade, ER, EGFR, and Ki-67 for IDCs. The SUVmax exhibited a positive association with Ki-67 in ILC; however, it was not significantly different with other factors, which suggests that the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be limited in ILC. BioMed Central 2015-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4371618/ /pubmed/25889560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0522-9 Text en © Jung et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jung, Na Young
Kim, Sung Hun
Choi, Bo Bae
Kim, Sung Hoon
Sung, Mi Sook
Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_full Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_fullStr Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_short Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
title_sort associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)f-fdg pet/ct and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4371618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0522-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jungnayoung associationsbetweenthestandardizeduptakevalueof18ffdgpetctandtheprognosticfactorsofinvasivelobularcarcinomaincomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT kimsunghun associationsbetweenthestandardizeduptakevalueof18ffdgpetctandtheprognosticfactorsofinvasivelobularcarcinomaincomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT choibobae associationsbetweenthestandardizeduptakevalueof18ffdgpetctandtheprognosticfactorsofinvasivelobularcarcinomaincomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT kimsunghoon associationsbetweenthestandardizeduptakevalueof18ffdgpetctandtheprognosticfactorsofinvasivelobularcarcinomaincomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma
AT sungmisook associationsbetweenthestandardizeduptakevalueof18ffdgpetctandtheprognosticfactorsofinvasivelobularcarcinomaincomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinoma