Cargando…

Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines

Global and regional economic and environmental changes are increasingly influencing local land-use, livelihoods, and ecosystems. At the same time, cumulative local land changes are driving global and regional changes in biodiversity and the environment. To understand the causes and consequences of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magliocca, Nicholas R., Rudel, Thomas K., Verburg, Peter H., McConnell, William J., Mertz, Ole, Gerstner, Katharina, Heinimann, Andreas, Ellis, Erle C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8
_version_ 1782363129587433472
author Magliocca, Nicholas R.
Rudel, Thomas K.
Verburg, Peter H.
McConnell, William J.
Mertz, Ole
Gerstner, Katharina
Heinimann, Andreas
Ellis, Erle C.
author_facet Magliocca, Nicholas R.
Rudel, Thomas K.
Verburg, Peter H.
McConnell, William J.
Mertz, Ole
Gerstner, Katharina
Heinimann, Andreas
Ellis, Erle C.
author_sort Magliocca, Nicholas R.
collection PubMed
description Global and regional economic and environmental changes are increasingly influencing local land-use, livelihoods, and ecosystems. At the same time, cumulative local land changes are driving global and regional changes in biodiversity and the environment. To understand the causes and consequences of these changes, land change science (LCS) draws on a wide array synthetic and meta-study techniques to generate global and regional knowledge from local case studies of land change. Here, we review the characteristics and applications of synthesis methods in LCS and assess the current state of synthetic research based on a meta-analysis of synthesis studies from 1995 to 2012. Publication of synthesis research is accelerating, with a clear trend toward increasingly sophisticated and quantitative methods, including meta-analysis. Detailed trends in synthesis objectives, methods, and land change phenomena and world regions most commonly studied are presented. Significant challenges to successful synthesis research in LCS are also identified, including issues of interpretability and comparability across case-studies and the limits of and biases in the geographic coverage of case studies. Nevertheless, synthesis methods based on local case studies will remain essential for generating systematic global and regional understanding of local land change for the foreseeable future, and multiple opportunities exist to accelerate and enhance the reliability of synthetic LCS research in the future. Demand for global and regional knowledge generation will continue to grow to support adaptation and mitigation policies consistent with both the local realities and regional and global environmental and economic contexts of land change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43721222015-03-27 Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines Magliocca, Nicholas R. Rudel, Thomas K. Verburg, Peter H. McConnell, William J. Mertz, Ole Gerstner, Katharina Heinimann, Andreas Ellis, Erle C. Reg Environ Change Review Global and regional economic and environmental changes are increasingly influencing local land-use, livelihoods, and ecosystems. At the same time, cumulative local land changes are driving global and regional changes in biodiversity and the environment. To understand the causes and consequences of these changes, land change science (LCS) draws on a wide array synthetic and meta-study techniques to generate global and regional knowledge from local case studies of land change. Here, we review the characteristics and applications of synthesis methods in LCS and assess the current state of synthetic research based on a meta-analysis of synthesis studies from 1995 to 2012. Publication of synthesis research is accelerating, with a clear trend toward increasingly sophisticated and quantitative methods, including meta-analysis. Detailed trends in synthesis objectives, methods, and land change phenomena and world regions most commonly studied are presented. Significant challenges to successful synthesis research in LCS are also identified, including issues of interpretability and comparability across case-studies and the limits of and biases in the geographic coverage of case studies. Nevertheless, synthesis methods based on local case studies will remain essential for generating systematic global and regional understanding of local land change for the foreseeable future, and multiple opportunities exist to accelerate and enhance the reliability of synthetic LCS research in the future. Demand for global and regional knowledge generation will continue to grow to support adaptation and mitigation policies consistent with both the local realities and regional and global environmental and economic contexts of land change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-06-06 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4372122/ /pubmed/25821402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Magliocca, Nicholas R.
Rudel, Thomas K.
Verburg, Peter H.
McConnell, William J.
Mertz, Ole
Gerstner, Katharina
Heinimann, Andreas
Ellis, Erle C.
Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title_full Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title_fullStr Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title_short Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
title_sort synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8
work_keys_str_mv AT maglioccanicholasr synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT rudelthomask synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT verburgpeterh synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT mcconnellwilliamj synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT mertzole synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT gerstnerkatharina synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT heinimannandreas synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines
AT elliserlec synthesisinlandchangesciencemethodologicalpatternschallengesandguidelines