Cargando…
Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140 |
_version_ | 1782363132795027456 |
---|---|
author | Quaife, Samantha L. Winstanley, Kelly Robb, Katie A. Simon, Alice E. Ramirez, Amanda J. Forbes, Lindsay J.L. Brain, Kate E. Gavin, Anna Wardle, Jane |
author_facet | Quaife, Samantha L. Winstanley, Kelly Robb, Katie A. Simon, Alice E. Ramirez, Amanda J. Forbes, Lindsay J.L. Brain, Kate E. Gavin, Anna Wardle, Jane |
author_sort | Quaife, Samantha L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgroups. This study aimed to assess SES differences in positive and negative attitudes towards cancer in UK adults. A population-based sample of UK adults (n=6965, age≥50 years) completed the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer scale, including six belief items: three positively framed (e.g. ‘Cancer can often be cured’) and three negatively framed (e.g. ‘A cancer diagnosis is a death sentence’). SES was indexed by education. Analyses controlled for sex, ethnicity, marital status, age, self-rated health, and cancer experience. There were few education-level differences for the positive statements, and overall agreement was high (all>90%). In contrast, there were strong differences for negative statements (all Ps<0.001). Among respondents with lower education levels, 57% agreed that ‘treatment is worse than cancer’, 27% that cancer is ‘a death sentence’ and 16% ‘would not want to know if I have cancer’. Among those with university education, the respective proportions were 34, 17 and 6%. Differences were not explained by cancer experience or health status. In conclusion, positive statements about cancer outcomes attract near-universal agreement. However, this optimistic perspective coexists alongside widespread fears about survival and treatment, especially among less-educated groups. Health education campaigns targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged groups might benefit from a focus on reducing negative attitudes, which is not necessarily achieved by promoting positive attitudes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4372163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43721632015-04-06 Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study Quaife, Samantha L. Winstanley, Kelly Robb, Katie A. Simon, Alice E. Ramirez, Amanda J. Forbes, Lindsay J.L. Brain, Kate E. Gavin, Anna Wardle, Jane Eur J Cancer Prev Research Papers: Epidemiology Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgroups. This study aimed to assess SES differences in positive and negative attitudes towards cancer in UK adults. A population-based sample of UK adults (n=6965, age≥50 years) completed the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer scale, including six belief items: three positively framed (e.g. ‘Cancer can often be cured’) and three negatively framed (e.g. ‘A cancer diagnosis is a death sentence’). SES was indexed by education. Analyses controlled for sex, ethnicity, marital status, age, self-rated health, and cancer experience. There were few education-level differences for the positive statements, and overall agreement was high (all>90%). In contrast, there were strong differences for negative statements (all Ps<0.001). Among respondents with lower education levels, 57% agreed that ‘treatment is worse than cancer’, 27% that cancer is ‘a death sentence’ and 16% ‘would not want to know if I have cancer’. Among those with university education, the respective proportions were 34, 17 and 6%. Differences were not explained by cancer experience or health status. In conclusion, positive statements about cancer outcomes attract near-universal agreement. However, this optimistic perspective coexists alongside widespread fears about survival and treatment, especially among less-educated groups. Health education campaigns targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged groups might benefit from a focus on reducing negative attitudes, which is not necessarily achieved by promoting positive attitudes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-05 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4372163/ /pubmed/25734238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers: Epidemiology Quaife, Samantha L. Winstanley, Kelly Robb, Katie A. Simon, Alice E. Ramirez, Amanda J. Forbes, Lindsay J.L. Brain, Kate E. Gavin, Anna Wardle, Jane Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title | Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title_full | Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title_fullStr | Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title_full_unstemmed | Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title_short | Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
title_sort | socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study |
topic | Research Papers: Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quaifesamanthal socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT winstanleykelly socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT robbkatiea socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT simonalicee socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT ramirezamandaj socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT forbeslindsayjl socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT brainkatee socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT gavinanna socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy AT wardlejane socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy |