Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study

Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quaife, Samantha L., Winstanley, Kelly, Robb, Katie A., Simon, Alice E., Ramirez, Amanda J., Forbes, Lindsay J.L., Brain, Kate E., Gavin, Anna, Wardle, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140
_version_ 1782363132795027456
author Quaife, Samantha L.
Winstanley, Kelly
Robb, Katie A.
Simon, Alice E.
Ramirez, Amanda J.
Forbes, Lindsay J.L.
Brain, Kate E.
Gavin, Anna
Wardle, Jane
author_facet Quaife, Samantha L.
Winstanley, Kelly
Robb, Katie A.
Simon, Alice E.
Ramirez, Amanda J.
Forbes, Lindsay J.L.
Brain, Kate E.
Gavin, Anna
Wardle, Jane
author_sort Quaife, Samantha L.
collection PubMed
description Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgroups. This study aimed to assess SES differences in positive and negative attitudes towards cancer in UK adults. A population-based sample of UK adults (n=6965, age≥50 years) completed the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer scale, including six belief items: three positively framed (e.g. ‘Cancer can often be cured’) and three negatively framed (e.g. ‘A cancer diagnosis is a death sentence’). SES was indexed by education. Analyses controlled for sex, ethnicity, marital status, age, self-rated health, and cancer experience. There were few education-level differences for the positive statements, and overall agreement was high (all>90%). In contrast, there were strong differences for negative statements (all Ps<0.001). Among respondents with lower education levels, 57% agreed that ‘treatment is worse than cancer’, 27% that cancer is ‘a death sentence’ and 16% ‘would not want to know if I have cancer’. Among those with university education, the respective proportions were 34, 17 and 6%. Differences were not explained by cancer experience or health status. In conclusion, positive statements about cancer outcomes attract near-universal agreement. However, this optimistic perspective coexists alongside widespread fears about survival and treatment, especially among less-educated groups. Health education campaigns targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged groups might benefit from a focus on reducing negative attitudes, which is not necessarily achieved by promoting positive attitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43721632015-04-06 Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study Quaife, Samantha L. Winstanley, Kelly Robb, Katie A. Simon, Alice E. Ramirez, Amanda J. Forbes, Lindsay J.L. Brain, Kate E. Gavin, Anna Wardle, Jane Eur J Cancer Prev Research Papers: Epidemiology Socioeconomic status (SES) differences in attitudes towards cancer have been implicated in the differential screening uptake and the timeliness of symptomatic presentation. However, the predominant emphasis of this work has been on cancer fatalism, and many studies focus on specific community subgroups. This study aimed to assess SES differences in positive and negative attitudes towards cancer in UK adults. A population-based sample of UK adults (n=6965, age≥50 years) completed the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer scale, including six belief items: three positively framed (e.g. ‘Cancer can often be cured’) and three negatively framed (e.g. ‘A cancer diagnosis is a death sentence’). SES was indexed by education. Analyses controlled for sex, ethnicity, marital status, age, self-rated health, and cancer experience. There were few education-level differences for the positive statements, and overall agreement was high (all>90%). In contrast, there were strong differences for negative statements (all Ps<0.001). Among respondents with lower education levels, 57% agreed that ‘treatment is worse than cancer’, 27% that cancer is ‘a death sentence’ and 16% ‘would not want to know if I have cancer’. Among those with university education, the respective proportions were 34, 17 and 6%. Differences were not explained by cancer experience or health status. In conclusion, positive statements about cancer outcomes attract near-universal agreement. However, this optimistic perspective coexists alongside widespread fears about survival and treatment, especially among less-educated groups. Health education campaigns targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged groups might benefit from a focus on reducing negative attitudes, which is not necessarily achieved by promoting positive attitudes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-05 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4372163/ /pubmed/25734238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
spellingShingle Research Papers: Epidemiology
Quaife, Samantha L.
Winstanley, Kelly
Robb, Katie A.
Simon, Alice E.
Ramirez, Amanda J.
Forbes, Lindsay J.L.
Brain, Kate E.
Gavin, Anna
Wardle, Jane
Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in attitudes towards cancer: an international cancer benchmarking partnership study
topic Research Papers: Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000140
work_keys_str_mv AT quaifesamanthal socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT winstanleykelly socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT robbkatiea socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT simonalicee socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT ramirezamandaj socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT forbeslindsayjl socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT brainkatee socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT gavinanna socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy
AT wardlejane socioeconomicinequalitiesinattitudestowardscanceraninternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipstudy