Cargando…

The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation

BACKGROUND: The impact of physical inactivity and unhealthy diet on health is increasingly profound. Lifestyle interventions targeting both behaviors simultaneously might decrease the prevalence of overweight and comorbidities. The Dutch ‘BeweegKuur’ is a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berendsen, Brenda AJ, Kremers, Stef PJ, Savelberg, Hans HCM, Schaper, Nicolaas C, Hendriks, Marike RC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5
_version_ 1782363133500719104
author Berendsen, Brenda AJ
Kremers, Stef PJ
Savelberg, Hans HCM
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Hendriks, Marike RC
author_facet Berendsen, Brenda AJ
Kremers, Stef PJ
Savelberg, Hans HCM
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Hendriks, Marike RC
author_sort Berendsen, Brenda AJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of physical inactivity and unhealthy diet on health is increasingly profound. Lifestyle interventions targeting both behaviors simultaneously might decrease the prevalence of overweight and comorbidities. The Dutch ‘BeweegKuur’ is a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in primary care, to improve physical activity and dietary behavior in overweight people. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, the (cost-) effectiveness of an intensively guided program has been compared to a less intensively guided program. This process evaluation aimed to assess protocol adherence and potential differences between clusters. In addition, sustainability (i.e. continuation of the CLI in practice after study termination) was evaluated. METHODS: Existing frameworks were combined to design the process evaluation for our intervention and setting specifically. We assessed reach, fidelity, dose delivered and received, context and implementation strategy. Both qualitative and quantitative data were used for a comprehensive evaluation. Data were collected in semi-structured interviews with health care providers (HCPs, n = 25), drop-out registration by HCPs, regular questionnaires among participants (n = 411) and logbooks kept by researchers during the trial. RESULTS: Protocol adherence by professionals and participants varied between the programs and clusters. In both programs the number of meetings with all HCPs was lower than planned in the protocol. Participants of the supervised program attended, compared to participants of the start-up program, more meetings with physiotherapists, but fewer with lifestyle advisors and dieticians. The ‘BeweegKuur’ was not sustained, but intervention aspects, networks and experiences were still utilized after finalization of the project. Whether clusters continued to offer a CLI seemed dependent on funding opportunities and collaborations. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol adherence in a CLI was problematic in both HCPs and participants. Mainly the amount of dietary guidance was lower than planned, and decreased with increasing guidance by PT. Thus, feasibility of changing physical activity and dietary habits simultaneously by one intervention in one year was not as high as expected. Also the sustainability of CLI was poor. When a CLI program is started, re-invention should be allowed and maximum effort should be taken to guarantee long term continuation, by planning both implementation and sustainability carefully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46574304. Registered 23 December 2010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43721672015-03-25 The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation Berendsen, Brenda AJ Kremers, Stef PJ Savelberg, Hans HCM Schaper, Nicolaas C Hendriks, Marike RC BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of physical inactivity and unhealthy diet on health is increasingly profound. Lifestyle interventions targeting both behaviors simultaneously might decrease the prevalence of overweight and comorbidities. The Dutch ‘BeweegKuur’ is a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in primary care, to improve physical activity and dietary behavior in overweight people. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, the (cost-) effectiveness of an intensively guided program has been compared to a less intensively guided program. This process evaluation aimed to assess protocol adherence and potential differences between clusters. In addition, sustainability (i.e. continuation of the CLI in practice after study termination) was evaluated. METHODS: Existing frameworks were combined to design the process evaluation for our intervention and setting specifically. We assessed reach, fidelity, dose delivered and received, context and implementation strategy. Both qualitative and quantitative data were used for a comprehensive evaluation. Data were collected in semi-structured interviews with health care providers (HCPs, n = 25), drop-out registration by HCPs, regular questionnaires among participants (n = 411) and logbooks kept by researchers during the trial. RESULTS: Protocol adherence by professionals and participants varied between the programs and clusters. In both programs the number of meetings with all HCPs was lower than planned in the protocol. Participants of the supervised program attended, compared to participants of the start-up program, more meetings with physiotherapists, but fewer with lifestyle advisors and dieticians. The ‘BeweegKuur’ was not sustained, but intervention aspects, networks and experiences were still utilized after finalization of the project. Whether clusters continued to offer a CLI seemed dependent on funding opportunities and collaborations. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol adherence in a CLI was problematic in both HCPs and participants. Mainly the amount of dietary guidance was lower than planned, and decreased with increasing guidance by PT. Thus, feasibility of changing physical activity and dietary habits simultaneously by one intervention in one year was not as high as expected. Also the sustainability of CLI was poor. When a CLI program is started, re-invention should be allowed and maximum effort should be taken to guarantee long term continuation, by planning both implementation and sustainability carefully. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46574304. Registered 23 December 2010. BioMed Central 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4372167/ /pubmed/25880376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5 Text en © Berendsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Berendsen, Brenda AJ
Kremers, Stef PJ
Savelberg, Hans HCM
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Hendriks, Marike RC
The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title_full The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title_fullStr The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title_short The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
title_sort implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0254-5
work_keys_str_mv AT berendsenbrendaaj theimplementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT kremersstefpj theimplementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT savelberghanshcm theimplementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT schapernicolaasc theimplementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT hendriksmarikerc theimplementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT berendsenbrendaaj implementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT kremersstefpj implementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT savelberghanshcm implementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT schapernicolaasc implementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation
AT hendriksmarikerc implementationandsustainabilityofacombinedlifestyleinterventioninprimarycaremixedmethodprocessevaluation