Cargando…

Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities

BACKGROUND: While South Africa has a new policy framework supporting the integration of mental health care into primary health care, this is not sufficient to ensure transformation of the health care system towards integrated primary mental health care. Health systems strengthening is needed, incorp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marais, Debra Leigh, Petersen, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0004-z
_version_ 1782363149996916736
author Marais, Debra Leigh
Petersen, Inge
author_facet Marais, Debra Leigh
Petersen, Inge
author_sort Marais, Debra Leigh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While South Africa has a new policy framework supporting the integration of mental health care into primary health care, this is not sufficient to ensure transformation of the health care system towards integrated primary mental health care. Health systems strengthening is needed, incorporating, inter alia, capacity building and resource inputs, as well as good governance for ensuring that the relevant policy imperatives are implemented. OBJECTIVES: To identify systemic factors within institutional and policy contexts that are likely to facilitate or impede the implementation of integrated mental health care in South Africa. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 key stakeholders in the Department of Health and Department of Social Development at national level, at provincial level in the North West Province, and at district level in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda district. Participants were purposively identified based on their positions and job responsibilities. Interview questions were guided by a hybrid of Siddiqi et al.’s governance framework principles and Mikkelsen-Lopez et al.’s health system governance approach. Data were analysed using framework analysis in NVivo. RESULTS: Facilitative factors included the recent mental health care policy framework and national action plan that embraces integrated care using a task sharing model and provides policy imperatives for the establishment of district mental health teams to facilitate the development and implementation of district mental health care plans; the roll out of the integrated chronic disease service delivery platform that can be leveraged to increase access and resources as well as decrease stigma; and the presence of NGOs that can assist with service delivery. Challenges included the low prioritisation and stigmatisation of mental illness; weak managerial and planning capacity to develop and implement mental health care plans at provincial and district level; poor pre-service training of generalists in mental health care; weak orientation to integrated care; high staff turnover; weak intersectoral coordination; infrastructural constraints; and no dedicated mental health budget. CONCLUSION: This study identifies strategies to support and improve integrated mental health care in primary health care services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43722712015-03-25 Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities Marais, Debra Leigh Petersen, Inge Int J Ment Health Syst Research BACKGROUND: While South Africa has a new policy framework supporting the integration of mental health care into primary health care, this is not sufficient to ensure transformation of the health care system towards integrated primary mental health care. Health systems strengthening is needed, incorporating, inter alia, capacity building and resource inputs, as well as good governance for ensuring that the relevant policy imperatives are implemented. OBJECTIVES: To identify systemic factors within institutional and policy contexts that are likely to facilitate or impede the implementation of integrated mental health care in South Africa. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 key stakeholders in the Department of Health and Department of Social Development at national level, at provincial level in the North West Province, and at district level in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda district. Participants were purposively identified based on their positions and job responsibilities. Interview questions were guided by a hybrid of Siddiqi et al.’s governance framework principles and Mikkelsen-Lopez et al.’s health system governance approach. Data were analysed using framework analysis in NVivo. RESULTS: Facilitative factors included the recent mental health care policy framework and national action plan that embraces integrated care using a task sharing model and provides policy imperatives for the establishment of district mental health teams to facilitate the development and implementation of district mental health care plans; the roll out of the integrated chronic disease service delivery platform that can be leveraged to increase access and resources as well as decrease stigma; and the presence of NGOs that can assist with service delivery. Challenges included the low prioritisation and stigmatisation of mental illness; weak managerial and planning capacity to develop and implement mental health care plans at provincial and district level; poor pre-service training of generalists in mental health care; weak orientation to integrated care; high staff turnover; weak intersectoral coordination; infrastructural constraints; and no dedicated mental health budget. CONCLUSION: This study identifies strategies to support and improve integrated mental health care in primary health care services. BioMed Central 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4372271/ /pubmed/25806085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0004-z Text en © Marais and Petersen; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Marais, Debra Leigh
Petersen, Inge
Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title_full Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title_fullStr Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title_short Health system governance to support integrated mental health care in South Africa: challenges and opportunities
title_sort health system governance to support integrated mental health care in south africa: challenges and opportunities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0004-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maraisdebraleigh healthsystemgovernancetosupportintegratedmentalhealthcareinsouthafricachallengesandopportunities
AT peterseninge healthsystemgovernancetosupportintegratedmentalhealthcareinsouthafricachallengesandopportunities