Cargando…

Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed under sedation, the difference in ESD performance according to sedation method is not well known. This study attempted to prospectively assess and compare the satisfaction of the endoscopists and patient stability dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Chan Hyuk, Shin, Seokyung, Lee, Sang Kil, Lee, Hyuk, Lee, Yong Chan, Park, Jun Chul, Yoo, Young Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25803441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120529
_version_ 1782363199047204864
author Park, Chan Hyuk
Shin, Seokyung
Lee, Sang Kil
Lee, Hyuk
Lee, Yong Chan
Park, Jun Chul
Yoo, Young Chul
author_facet Park, Chan Hyuk
Shin, Seokyung
Lee, Sang Kil
Lee, Hyuk
Lee, Yong Chan
Park, Jun Chul
Yoo, Young Chul
author_sort Park, Chan Hyuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed under sedation, the difference in ESD performance according to sedation method is not well known. This study attempted to prospectively assess and compare the satisfaction of the endoscopists and patient stability during ESD between two sedation methods. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four adult patients scheduled for ESD were sedated by either the IMIE (intermittent midazolam/propofol injection by endoscopist) or CPIA (continuous propofol infusion by anesthesiologist) method. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the level of satisfaction of the endoscopists between the two groups. The secondary endpoints included level of satisfaction of the patients, patient’s pain scores, events interfering with the procedure, incidence of unintended deep sedation, hemodynamic and respiratory events, and ESD outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Level of satisfaction of the endoscopists was significantly higher in the CPIA Group compared to the IMIE group (IMIE vs. CPIA; high satisfaction score; 63.2% vs. 87.2%, P=0.001). The incidence of unintended deep sedation was significantly higher in the IMIE Group compared to the CPIA Group (IMIE vs. CPIA; 17.1% vs. 5.1%, P=0.018) as well as the number of patients showing spontaneous movement or those requiring physical restraint (IMIE vs. CPIA; spontaneous movement; 60.5% vs. 42.3%, P=0.024, physical restraint; 27.6% vs. 10.3%, P=0.006, respectively). In contrast, level of satisfaction of the patients were found to be significantly higher in the IMIE Group (IMIE vs. CPIA; high satisfaction score; 85.5% vs. 67.9%, P=0.027). Pain scores of the patients, hemodynamic and respiratory events, and ESD outcomes and complications were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuous propofol and remifentanil infusion by an anesthesiologist during ESD can increase the satisfaction levels of the endoscopists by providing a more stable state of sedation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01806753
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43725582015-04-04 Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial Park, Chan Hyuk Shin, Seokyung Lee, Sang Kil Lee, Hyuk Lee, Yong Chan Park, Jun Chul Yoo, Young Chul PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed under sedation, the difference in ESD performance according to sedation method is not well known. This study attempted to prospectively assess and compare the satisfaction of the endoscopists and patient stability during ESD between two sedation methods. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four adult patients scheduled for ESD were sedated by either the IMIE (intermittent midazolam/propofol injection by endoscopist) or CPIA (continuous propofol infusion by anesthesiologist) method. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the level of satisfaction of the endoscopists between the two groups. The secondary endpoints included level of satisfaction of the patients, patient’s pain scores, events interfering with the procedure, incidence of unintended deep sedation, hemodynamic and respiratory events, and ESD outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Level of satisfaction of the endoscopists was significantly higher in the CPIA Group compared to the IMIE group (IMIE vs. CPIA; high satisfaction score; 63.2% vs. 87.2%, P=0.001). The incidence of unintended deep sedation was significantly higher in the IMIE Group compared to the CPIA Group (IMIE vs. CPIA; 17.1% vs. 5.1%, P=0.018) as well as the number of patients showing spontaneous movement or those requiring physical restraint (IMIE vs. CPIA; spontaneous movement; 60.5% vs. 42.3%, P=0.024, physical restraint; 27.6% vs. 10.3%, P=0.006, respectively). In contrast, level of satisfaction of the patients were found to be significantly higher in the IMIE Group (IMIE vs. CPIA; high satisfaction score; 85.5% vs. 67.9%, P=0.027). Pain scores of the patients, hemodynamic and respiratory events, and ESD outcomes and complications were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuous propofol and remifentanil infusion by an anesthesiologist during ESD can increase the satisfaction levels of the endoscopists by providing a more stable state of sedation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01806753 Public Library of Science 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4372558/ /pubmed/25803441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120529 Text en © 2015 Park et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Chan Hyuk
Shin, Seokyung
Lee, Sang Kil
Lee, Hyuk
Lee, Yong Chan
Park, Jun Chul
Yoo, Young Chul
Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title_full Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title_short Assessing the Stability and Safety of Procedure during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to Sedation Methods: A Randomized Trial
title_sort assessing the stability and safety of procedure during endoscopic submucosal dissection according to sedation methods: a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25803441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120529
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchanhyuk assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT shinseokyung assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT leesangkil assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT leehyuk assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT leeyongchan assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT parkjunchul assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial
AT yooyoungchul assessingthestabilityandsafetyofprocedureduringendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionaccordingtosedationmethodsarandomizedtrial