Cargando…
The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6 |
_version_ | 1782363233518092288 |
---|---|
author | Jensen, Henning Tarp Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. Smith, Richard D. Chalabi, Zaid Dangour, Alan D. Davies, Mike Edwards, Phil Garnett, Tara Givoni, Moshe Griffiths, Ulla Hamilton, Ian Jarrett, James Roberts, Ian Wilkinson, Paul Woodcock, James Haines, Andy |
author_facet | Jensen, Henning Tarp Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. Smith, Richard D. Chalabi, Zaid Dangour, Alan D. Davies, Mike Edwards, Phil Garnett, Tara Givoni, Moshe Griffiths, Ulla Hamilton, Ian Jarrett, James Roberts, Ian Wilkinson, Paul Woodcock, James Haines, Andy |
author_sort | Jensen, Henning Tarp |
collection | PubMed |
description | We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In contrast to previous assessment studies, our main focus is on health co-benefits additional to those from reduced local air pollution. We employ a conservative cost-effectiveness methodology with a zero net cost threshold. Our urban transport strategy (with cleaner vehicles and increased active travel) brings important health co-benefits and is likely to be strongly cost-effective; our food and agriculture strategy (based on abatement technologies and reduction in livestock production) brings worthwhile health co-benefits, but is unlikely to eliminate net costs unless new technological measures are included; our household energy efficiency strategy is likely to breakeven only over the long term after the investment programme has ceased (beyond our 20 year time horizon). We conclude that UK policy makers will, most likely, have to adopt elements which involve initial net societal costs in order to achieve future emission targets and longer-term benefits from GHG reduction. Cost-effectiveness of GHG strategies is likely to require technological mitigation interventions and/or demand-constraining interventions with important health co-benefits and other efficiency-enhancing policies that promote internalization of externalities. Health co-benefits can play a crucial role in bringing down net costs, but our results also suggest the need for adopting holistic assessment methodologies which give proper consideration to welfare-improving health co-benefits with potentially negative economic repercussions (such as increased longevity). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4372778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43727782015-03-30 The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies Jensen, Henning Tarp Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. Smith, Richard D. Chalabi, Zaid Dangour, Alan D. Davies, Mike Edwards, Phil Garnett, Tara Givoni, Moshe Griffiths, Ulla Hamilton, Ian Jarrett, James Roberts, Ian Wilkinson, Paul Woodcock, James Haines, Andy Clim Change Article We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In contrast to previous assessment studies, our main focus is on health co-benefits additional to those from reduced local air pollution. We employ a conservative cost-effectiveness methodology with a zero net cost threshold. Our urban transport strategy (with cleaner vehicles and increased active travel) brings important health co-benefits and is likely to be strongly cost-effective; our food and agriculture strategy (based on abatement technologies and reduction in livestock production) brings worthwhile health co-benefits, but is unlikely to eliminate net costs unless new technological measures are included; our household energy efficiency strategy is likely to breakeven only over the long term after the investment programme has ceased (beyond our 20 year time horizon). We conclude that UK policy makers will, most likely, have to adopt elements which involve initial net societal costs in order to achieve future emission targets and longer-term benefits from GHG reduction. Cost-effectiveness of GHG strategies is likely to require technological mitigation interventions and/or demand-constraining interventions with important health co-benefits and other efficiency-enhancing policies that promote internalization of externalities. Health co-benefits can play a crucial role in bringing down net costs, but our results also suggest the need for adopting holistic assessment methodologies which give proper consideration to welfare-improving health co-benefits with potentially negative economic repercussions (such as increased longevity). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2013-09-20 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4372778/ /pubmed/25834297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 |
spellingShingle | Article Jensen, Henning Tarp Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. Smith, Richard D. Chalabi, Zaid Dangour, Alan D. Davies, Mike Edwards, Phil Garnett, Tara Givoni, Moshe Griffiths, Ulla Hamilton, Ian Jarrett, James Roberts, Ian Wilkinson, Paul Woodcock, James Haines, Andy The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title | The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title_full | The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title_fullStr | The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title_short | The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies |
title_sort | importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of uk greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensenhenningtarp theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT keoghbrownmarcusr theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT smithrichardd theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT chalabizaid theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT dangouraland theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT daviesmike theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT edwardsphil theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT garnetttara theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT givonimoshe theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT griffithsulla theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT hamiltonian theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT jarrettjames theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT robertsian theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT wilkinsonpaul theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT woodcockjames theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT hainesandy theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT jensenhenningtarp importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT keoghbrownmarcusr importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT smithrichardd importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT chalabizaid importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT dangouraland importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT daviesmike importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT edwardsphil importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT garnetttara importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT givonimoshe importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT griffithsulla importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT hamiltonian importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT jarrettjames importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT robertsian importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT wilkinsonpaul importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT woodcockjames importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies AT hainesandy importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies |