Cargando…

The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies

We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Henning Tarp, Keogh-Brown, Marcus R., Smith, Richard D., Chalabi, Zaid, Dangour, Alan D., Davies, Mike, Edwards, Phil, Garnett, Tara, Givoni, Moshe, Griffiths, Ulla, Hamilton, Ian, Jarrett, James, Roberts, Ian, Wilkinson, Paul, Woodcock, James, Haines, Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6
_version_ 1782363233518092288
author Jensen, Henning Tarp
Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.
Smith, Richard D.
Chalabi, Zaid
Dangour, Alan D.
Davies, Mike
Edwards, Phil
Garnett, Tara
Givoni, Moshe
Griffiths, Ulla
Hamilton, Ian
Jarrett, James
Roberts, Ian
Wilkinson, Paul
Woodcock, James
Haines, Andy
author_facet Jensen, Henning Tarp
Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.
Smith, Richard D.
Chalabi, Zaid
Dangour, Alan D.
Davies, Mike
Edwards, Phil
Garnett, Tara
Givoni, Moshe
Griffiths, Ulla
Hamilton, Ian
Jarrett, James
Roberts, Ian
Wilkinson, Paul
Woodcock, James
Haines, Andy
author_sort Jensen, Henning Tarp
collection PubMed
description We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In contrast to previous assessment studies, our main focus is on health co-benefits additional to those from reduced local air pollution. We employ a conservative cost-effectiveness methodology with a zero net cost threshold. Our urban transport strategy (with cleaner vehicles and increased active travel) brings important health co-benefits and is likely to be strongly cost-effective; our food and agriculture strategy (based on abatement technologies and reduction in livestock production) brings worthwhile health co-benefits, but is unlikely to eliminate net costs unless new technological measures are included; our household energy efficiency strategy is likely to breakeven only over the long term after the investment programme has ceased (beyond our 20 year time horizon). We conclude that UK policy makers will, most likely, have to adopt elements which involve initial net societal costs in order to achieve future emission targets and longer-term benefits from GHG reduction. Cost-effectiveness of GHG strategies is likely to require technological mitigation interventions and/or demand-constraining interventions with important health co-benefits and other efficiency-enhancing policies that promote internalization of externalities. Health co-benefits can play a crucial role in bringing down net costs, but our results also suggest the need for adopting holistic assessment methodologies which give proper consideration to welfare-improving health co-benefits with potentially negative economic repercussions (such as increased longevity). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4372778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43727782015-03-30 The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies Jensen, Henning Tarp Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. Smith, Richard D. Chalabi, Zaid Dangour, Alan D. Davies, Mike Edwards, Phil Garnett, Tara Givoni, Moshe Griffiths, Ulla Hamilton, Ian Jarrett, James Roberts, Ian Wilkinson, Paul Woodcock, James Haines, Andy Clim Change Article We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In contrast to previous assessment studies, our main focus is on health co-benefits additional to those from reduced local air pollution. We employ a conservative cost-effectiveness methodology with a zero net cost threshold. Our urban transport strategy (with cleaner vehicles and increased active travel) brings important health co-benefits and is likely to be strongly cost-effective; our food and agriculture strategy (based on abatement technologies and reduction in livestock production) brings worthwhile health co-benefits, but is unlikely to eliminate net costs unless new technological measures are included; our household energy efficiency strategy is likely to breakeven only over the long term after the investment programme has ceased (beyond our 20 year time horizon). We conclude that UK policy makers will, most likely, have to adopt elements which involve initial net societal costs in order to achieve future emission targets and longer-term benefits from GHG reduction. Cost-effectiveness of GHG strategies is likely to require technological mitigation interventions and/or demand-constraining interventions with important health co-benefits and other efficiency-enhancing policies that promote internalization of externalities. Health co-benefits can play a crucial role in bringing down net costs, but our results also suggest the need for adopting holistic assessment methodologies which give proper consideration to welfare-improving health co-benefits with potentially negative economic repercussions (such as increased longevity). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2013-09-20 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4372778/ /pubmed/25834297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
spellingShingle Article
Jensen, Henning Tarp
Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.
Smith, Richard D.
Chalabi, Zaid
Dangour, Alan D.
Davies, Mike
Edwards, Phil
Garnett, Tara
Givoni, Moshe
Griffiths, Ulla
Hamilton, Ian
Jarrett, James
Roberts, Ian
Wilkinson, Paul
Woodcock, James
Haines, Andy
The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title_full The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title_fullStr The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title_full_unstemmed The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title_short The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies
title_sort importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of uk greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0881-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenhenningtarp theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT keoghbrownmarcusr theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT smithrichardd theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT chalabizaid theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT dangouraland theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT daviesmike theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT edwardsphil theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT garnetttara theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT givonimoshe theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT griffithsulla theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT hamiltonian theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT jarrettjames theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT robertsian theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT wilkinsonpaul theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT woodcockjames theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT hainesandy theimportanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT jensenhenningtarp importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT keoghbrownmarcusr importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT smithrichardd importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT chalabizaid importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT dangouraland importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT daviesmike importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT edwardsphil importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT garnetttara importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT givonimoshe importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT griffithsulla importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT hamiltonian importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT jarrettjames importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT robertsian importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT wilkinsonpaul importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT woodcockjames importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies
AT hainesandy importanceofhealthcobenefitsinmacroeconomicassessmentsofukgreenhousegasemissionreductionstrategies