Cargando…
The Technology of the Gibbet
The practice of “hanging in chains” or gibbeting had been part of the punitive repertoire of the English and Welsh judicial system for centuries before the 1751–52 Murder Act specified it as one of two mandatory post-mortem punishments for murderers. The practice was not abolished until 1834. This a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-014-0275-0 |
_version_ | 1782363240054915072 |
---|---|
author | Tarlow, Sarah |
author_facet | Tarlow, Sarah |
author_sort | Tarlow, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The practice of “hanging in chains” or gibbeting had been part of the punitive repertoire of the English and Welsh judicial system for centuries before the 1751–52 Murder Act specified it as one of two mandatory post-mortem punishments for murderers. The practice was not abolished until 1834. This article considers the technical and design features of the gibbet cage, through an exhaustive survey and catalogue of their surviving remains. It notes that, given the comparative rarity of hanging in chains, no chronological or regional traditions of design are evident in this kind of artifact, since blacksmiths were individually solving the problem of fulfilling the necessary functions of a gibbet cage without knowledge of previous examples and under great time pressure. The technology of the gibbet shows how state directives intersected with geographical discretion in the creation of idiosyncratic local solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4372825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43728252015-03-30 The Technology of the Gibbet Tarlow, Sarah Int J Hist Archaeol Article The practice of “hanging in chains” or gibbeting had been part of the punitive repertoire of the English and Welsh judicial system for centuries before the 1751–52 Murder Act specified it as one of two mandatory post-mortem punishments for murderers. The practice was not abolished until 1834. This article considers the technical and design features of the gibbet cage, through an exhaustive survey and catalogue of their surviving remains. It notes that, given the comparative rarity of hanging in chains, no chronological or regional traditions of design are evident in this kind of artifact, since blacksmiths were individually solving the problem of fulfilling the necessary functions of a gibbet cage without knowledge of previous examples and under great time pressure. The technology of the gibbet shows how state directives intersected with geographical discretion in the creation of idiosyncratic local solutions. Springer US 2014-09-14 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4372825/ /pubmed/25834380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-014-0275-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Tarlow, Sarah The Technology of the Gibbet |
title | The Technology of the Gibbet |
title_full | The Technology of the Gibbet |
title_fullStr | The Technology of the Gibbet |
title_full_unstemmed | The Technology of the Gibbet |
title_short | The Technology of the Gibbet |
title_sort | technology of the gibbet |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10761-014-0275-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tarlowsarah thetechnologyofthegibbet AT tarlowsarah technologyofthegibbet |