Cargando…

Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nouri, Mahtab, Farzan, Arash, Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh, Massudi, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar
_version_ 1782363275969691648
author Nouri, Mahtab
Farzan, Arash
Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh
Massudi, Reza
author_facet Nouri, Mahtab
Farzan, Arash
Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh
Massudi, Reza
author_sort Nouri, Mahtab
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular orthodontic study casts of 18 adults with normal Class I occlusion. First, the coordinates of the bracket points were measured on all casts by a CMM. Then, the three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the bracket points were measured on the same casts by a 3D laser scanner designed at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. The validity and reliability of each system were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The difference between the mean dimension and the actual value for the CMM was 0.0066 mm. (95% CI: 69.98340, 69.99140). The mean difference for the laser scanner was 0.107 ± 0.133 mm (95% CI: -0.002, 0.24). In each method, differences were not significant. The ICC comparing the two methods was 0.998 for the X coordinate, and 0.996 for the Y coordinate; the mean difference for coordinates recorded in the entire arch and for each tooth was 0.616 mm. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of clinical bracket point coordinates measured by the laser scanner was equal to that of CMM. The mean difference in measurements was within the range of operator errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43730172015-03-25 Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine Nouri, Mahtab Farzan, Arash Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh Massudi, Reza Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular orthodontic study casts of 18 adults with normal Class I occlusion. First, the coordinates of the bracket points were measured on all casts by a CMM. Then, the three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the bracket points were measured on the same casts by a 3D laser scanner designed at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. The validity and reliability of each system were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The difference between the mean dimension and the actual value for the CMM was 0.0066 mm. (95% CI: 69.98340, 69.99140). The mean difference for the laser scanner was 0.107 ± 0.133 mm (95% CI: -0.002, 0.24). In each method, differences were not significant. The ICC comparing the two methods was 0.998 for the X coordinate, and 0.996 for the Y coordinate; the mean difference for coordinates recorded in the entire arch and for each tooth was 0.616 mm. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of clinical bracket point coordinates measured by the laser scanner was equal to that of CMM. The mean difference in measurements was within the range of operator errors. Dental Press International 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4373017/ /pubmed/25741826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Nouri, Mahtab
Farzan, Arash
Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh
Massudi, Reza
Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title_full Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title_short Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
title_sort comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3d laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT nourimahtab comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine
AT farzanarash comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine
AT baghbanalirezaakbarzadeh comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine
AT massudireza comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine