Cargando…
Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxill...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar |
_version_ | 1782363275969691648 |
---|---|
author | Nouri, Mahtab Farzan, Arash Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh Massudi, Reza |
author_facet | Nouri, Mahtab Farzan, Arash Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh Massudi, Reza |
author_sort | Nouri, Mahtab |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular orthodontic study casts of 18 adults with normal Class I occlusion. First, the coordinates of the bracket points were measured on all casts by a CMM. Then, the three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the bracket points were measured on the same casts by a 3D laser scanner designed at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. The validity and reliability of each system were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The difference between the mean dimension and the actual value for the CMM was 0.0066 mm. (95% CI: 69.98340, 69.99140). The mean difference for the laser scanner was 0.107 ± 0.133 mm (95% CI: -0.002, 0.24). In each method, differences were not significant. The ICC comparing the two methods was 0.998 for the X coordinate, and 0.996 for the Y coordinate; the mean difference for coordinates recorded in the entire arch and for each tooth was 0.616 mm. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of clinical bracket point coordinates measured by the laser scanner was equal to that of CMM. The mean difference in measurements was within the range of operator errors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4373017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43730172015-03-25 Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine Nouri, Mahtab Farzan, Arash Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh Massudi, Reza Dental Press J Orthod Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of a laser scanner developed to determine the coordinates of clinical bracket points and to compare with the results of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). METHODS: This diagnostic experimental study was conducted on maxillary and mandibular orthodontic study casts of 18 adults with normal Class I occlusion. First, the coordinates of the bracket points were measured on all casts by a CMM. Then, the three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of the bracket points were measured on the same casts by a 3D laser scanner designed at Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. The validity and reliability of each system were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula. RESULTS: The difference between the mean dimension and the actual value for the CMM was 0.0066 mm. (95% CI: 69.98340, 69.99140). The mean difference for the laser scanner was 0.107 ± 0.133 mm (95% CI: -0.002, 0.24). In each method, differences were not significant. The ICC comparing the two methods was 0.998 for the X coordinate, and 0.996 for the Y coordinate; the mean difference for coordinates recorded in the entire arch and for each tooth was 0.616 mm. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of clinical bracket point coordinates measured by the laser scanner was equal to that of CMM. The mean difference in measurements was within the range of operator errors. Dental Press International 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4373017/ /pubmed/25741826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Nouri, Mahtab Farzan, Arash Baghban, Ali Reza Akbarzadeh Massudi, Reza Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine |
title | Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
title_full | Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
title_short | Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
title_sort | comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3d laser scanner
and coordinate measuring machine |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.059-065.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nourimahtab comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine AT farzanarash comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine AT baghbanalirezaakbarzadeh comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine AT massudireza comparisonofclinicalbracketpointregistrationwith3dlaserscannerandcoordinatemeasuringmachine |