Cargando…
The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type
Pollinators have long been known to select for floral traits, but the nature of this relationship has been little investigated in trap pollination systems. We investigated the trapping devices of 15 Arum spp. and compared them with the types of insects trapped. Most species shared a similar general...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boj.12054 |
_version_ | 1782363297849278464 |
---|---|
author | Bröderbauer, David Weber, Anton Diaz, Anita |
author_facet | Bröderbauer, David Weber, Anton Diaz, Anita |
author_sort | Bröderbauer, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pollinators have long been known to select for floral traits, but the nature of this relationship has been little investigated in trap pollination systems. We investigated the trapping devices of 15 Arum spp. and compared them with the types of insects trapped. Most species shared a similar general design of trap chamber walls covered in downward-pointing papillate cells, lacunose cells in the chamber wall and elongated sterile flowers partially blocking the exit of the trap. However, there was significant variation in all these morphological features between species. Furthermore, these differences related to the type of pollinator trapped. Most strikingly, species pollinated by midges had a slippery epidermal surface consisting of smaller papillae than in species pollinated by other insects. Midge-pollinated species also had more elongated sterile flowers and tended to have a larger lacunose area. We conclude that pollination traps evolve in response to the type of insect trapped and that changes to the slippery surfaces of the chamber wall are an important and previously little recognized variable in the design of pollination traps. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 172, 385–397. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4373131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43731312015-03-26 The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type Bröderbauer, David Weber, Anton Diaz, Anita Bot J Linn Soc Original Articles Pollinators have long been known to select for floral traits, but the nature of this relationship has been little investigated in trap pollination systems. We investigated the trapping devices of 15 Arum spp. and compared them with the types of insects trapped. Most species shared a similar general design of trap chamber walls covered in downward-pointing papillate cells, lacunose cells in the chamber wall and elongated sterile flowers partially blocking the exit of the trap. However, there was significant variation in all these morphological features between species. Furthermore, these differences related to the type of pollinator trapped. Most strikingly, species pollinated by midges had a slippery epidermal surface consisting of smaller papillae than in species pollinated by other insects. Midge-pollinated species also had more elongated sterile flowers and tended to have a larger lacunose area. We conclude that pollination traps evolve in response to the type of insect trapped and that changes to the slippery surfaces of the chamber wall are an important and previously little recognized variable in the design of pollination traps. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 172, 385–397. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-07 2013-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4373131/ /pubmed/25821243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boj.12054 Text en © 2013 The Linnean Society of London http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bröderbauer, David Weber, Anton Diaz, Anita The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title | The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title_full | The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title_fullStr | The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title_full_unstemmed | The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title_short | The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type |
title_sort | design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus arum (araceae) is related to insect type |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boj.12054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broderbauerdavid thedesignoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype AT weberanton thedesignoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype AT diazanita thedesignoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype AT broderbauerdavid designoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype AT weberanton designoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype AT diazanita designoftrappingdevicesinpollinationtrapsofthegenusarumaraceaeisrelatedtoinsecttype |