Cargando…

Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review

Objective: The aim of this study was to review the literature on clinical applications of the Hybrid Assistive Limb system for gait training. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and clinicaltrials.gov and additional search was made using referen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Anneli, Borg, Jörgen, Palmcrantz, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048
_version_ 1782363309717061632
author Wall, Anneli
Borg, Jörgen
Palmcrantz, Susanne
author_facet Wall, Anneli
Borg, Jörgen
Palmcrantz, Susanne
author_sort Wall, Anneli
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of this study was to review the literature on clinical applications of the Hybrid Assistive Limb system for gait training. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and clinicaltrials.gov and additional search was made using reference lists in identified reports. Abstracts were screened, relevant articles were reviewed and subject to quality assessment. Results: Out of 37 studies, 7 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Six studies were single group studies and 1 was an explorative randomized controlled trial. In total, these studies involved 140 participants of whom 118 completed the interventions and 107 used HAL for gait training. Five studies concerned gait training after stroke, 1 after spinal cord injury (SCI) and 1 study after stroke, SCI or other diseases affecting walking ability. Minor and transient side effects occurred but no serious adverse events were reported in the studies. Beneficial effects on gait function variables and independence in walking were observed. Conclusions: The accumulated findings demonstrate that the HAL system is feasible when used for gait training of patients with lower extremity paresis in a professional setting. Beneficial effects on gait function and independence in walking were observed but data do not allow conclusions. Further controlled studies are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43732512015-04-09 Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review Wall, Anneli Borg, Jörgen Palmcrantz, Susanne Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: The aim of this study was to review the literature on clinical applications of the Hybrid Assistive Limb system for gait training. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and clinicaltrials.gov and additional search was made using reference lists in identified reports. Abstracts were screened, relevant articles were reviewed and subject to quality assessment. Results: Out of 37 studies, 7 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Six studies were single group studies and 1 was an explorative randomized controlled trial. In total, these studies involved 140 participants of whom 118 completed the interventions and 107 used HAL for gait training. Five studies concerned gait training after stroke, 1 after spinal cord injury (SCI) and 1 study after stroke, SCI or other diseases affecting walking ability. Minor and transient side effects occurred but no serious adverse events were reported in the studies. Beneficial effects on gait function variables and independence in walking were observed. Conclusions: The accumulated findings demonstrate that the HAL system is feasible when used for gait training of patients with lower extremity paresis in a professional setting. Beneficial effects on gait function and independence in walking were observed but data do not allow conclusions. Further controlled studies are recommended. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373251/ /pubmed/25859191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wall, Borg and Palmcrantz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wall, Anneli
Borg, Jörgen
Palmcrantz, Susanne
Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title_full Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title_short Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
title_sort clinical application of the hybrid assistive limb (hal) for gait training—a systematic review
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048
work_keys_str_mv AT wallanneli clinicalapplicationofthehybridassistivelimbhalforgaittrainingasystematicreview
AT borgjorgen clinicalapplicationofthehybridassistivelimbhalforgaittrainingasystematicreview
AT palmcrantzsusanne clinicalapplicationofthehybridassistivelimbhalforgaittrainingasystematicreview