Cargando…
Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study
BACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.26 |
_version_ | 1782363332400906240 |
---|---|
author | Tonkin-Crine, Sarah Anthierens, Sibyl Francis, Nick A Brugman, Curt Fernandez-Vandellos, Patricia Krawczyk, Jaroslaw Llor, Carl Yardley, Lucy Coenen, Samuel Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Butler, Christopher C Verheij, Theo JM Goossens, Herman Little, Paul Cals, Jochen W |
author_facet | Tonkin-Crine, Sarah Anthierens, Sibyl Francis, Nick A Brugman, Curt Fernandez-Vandellos, Patricia Krawczyk, Jaroslaw Llor, Carl Yardley, Lucy Coenen, Samuel Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Butler, Christopher C Verheij, Theo JM Goossens, Herman Little, Paul Cals, Jochen W |
author_sort | Tonkin-Crine, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. AIMS: This process evaluation explored patients’ views of primary care consultations using the two interventions in six European countries. METHODS: Sixty-two interviews were conducted with patients who had participated in the GRACE INTRO trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated into English where necessary. Analysis used techniques from thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: Most patients were satisfied with their consultation despite many not receiving an antibiotic. Patients appeared to accept the use of both intervention approaches. A minority, but particularly in the trial arm with both interventions, reported that they would wait longer before consulting for cough in future. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived that both interventions supported the general practitioner’s (GP’s) prescribing decisions by helping them understand when an antibiotic was, and was not, needed. Patients consulting with acute cough had largely positive views about the GP’s enhanced communication skills, which included understanding their concerns, and the use of a near-patient test as an additional investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4373386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43733862015-09-15 Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study Tonkin-Crine, Sarah Anthierens, Sibyl Francis, Nick A Brugman, Curt Fernandez-Vandellos, Patricia Krawczyk, Jaroslaw Llor, Carl Yardley, Lucy Coenen, Samuel Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Butler, Christopher C Verheij, Theo JM Goossens, Herman Little, Paul Cals, Jochen W NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article BACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. AIMS: This process evaluation explored patients’ views of primary care consultations using the two interventions in six European countries. METHODS: Sixty-two interviews were conducted with patients who had participated in the GRACE INTRO trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated into English where necessary. Analysis used techniques from thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: Most patients were satisfied with their consultation despite many not receiving an antibiotic. Patients appeared to accept the use of both intervention approaches. A minority, but particularly in the trial arm with both interventions, reported that they would wait longer before consulting for cough in future. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived that both interventions supported the general practitioner’s (GP’s) prescribing decisions by helping them understand when an antibiotic was, and was not, needed. Patients consulting with acute cough had largely positive views about the GP’s enhanced communication skills, which included understanding their concerns, and the use of a near-patient test as an additional investigation. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4373386/ /pubmed/25030621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.26 Text en Copyright © 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Tonkin-Crine, Sarah Anthierens, Sibyl Francis, Nick A Brugman, Curt Fernandez-Vandellos, Patricia Krawczyk, Jaroslaw Llor, Carl Yardley, Lucy Coenen, Samuel Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Butler, Christopher C Verheij, Theo JM Goossens, Herman Little, Paul Cals, Jochen W Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title | Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title_full | Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title_short | Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study |
title_sort | exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country european qualitative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tonkincrinesarah exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT anthierenssibyl exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT francisnicka exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT brugmancurt exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT fernandezvandellospatricia exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT krawczykjaroslaw exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT llorcarl exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT yardleylucy exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT coenensamuel exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT godyckicwirkomaciek exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT butlerchristopherc exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT verheijtheojm exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT goossensherman exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT littlepaul exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy AT calsjochenw exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy |