Cargando…

Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics

The effects of predation on ungulate populations depend on several factors. One of the most important factors is the proportion of predation that is additive or compensatory respectively to other mortality in the prey, i.e., the relative effect of top-down and bottom-up processes. We estimated Euras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrén, Henrik, Liberg, Olof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120570
_version_ 1782363381136621568
author Andrén, Henrik
Liberg, Olof
author_facet Andrén, Henrik
Liberg, Olof
author_sort Andrén, Henrik
collection PubMed
description The effects of predation on ungulate populations depend on several factors. One of the most important factors is the proportion of predation that is additive or compensatory respectively to other mortality in the prey, i.e., the relative effect of top-down and bottom-up processes. We estimated Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) kill rate on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) using radio-collared lynx. Kill rate was strongly affected by lynx social status. For males it was 4.85 ± 1.30 S.E. roe deer per 30 days, for females with kittens 6.23 ± 0.83 S.E. and for solitary females 2.71 ± 0.47 S.E. We found very weak support for effects of prey density (both for Type I (linear) and Type II (non-linear) functional responses) and of season (winter, summer) on lynx kill rate. Additionally, we analysed the growth rate in a roe deer population from 1985 to 2005 in an area, which lynx naturally re-colonized in 1996. The annual roe deer growth rate was lower after lynx re-colonized the study area, but it was also negatively influenced by roe deer density. Before lynx colonized the area roe deer growth rate was λ = 1.079 (± 0.061 S.E.), while after lynx re-colonization it was λ = 0.94 (± 0.051 S.E.). Thus, the growth rate in the roe deer population decreased by Δλ = 0.14 (± 0.080 S.E.) after lynx re-colonized the study area, which corresponded to the estimated lynx predation rate on roe deer (0.11 ± 0.042 S.E.), suggesting that lynx predation was mainly additive to other mortality in roe deer. To conclude, this study suggests that lynx predation together with density dependent factors both influence the roe deer population dynamics. Thus, both top-down and bottom-up processes operated at the same time in this predator-prey system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43737822015-03-27 Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics Andrén, Henrik Liberg, Olof PLoS One Research Article The effects of predation on ungulate populations depend on several factors. One of the most important factors is the proportion of predation that is additive or compensatory respectively to other mortality in the prey, i.e., the relative effect of top-down and bottom-up processes. We estimated Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) kill rate on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) using radio-collared lynx. Kill rate was strongly affected by lynx social status. For males it was 4.85 ± 1.30 S.E. roe deer per 30 days, for females with kittens 6.23 ± 0.83 S.E. and for solitary females 2.71 ± 0.47 S.E. We found very weak support for effects of prey density (both for Type I (linear) and Type II (non-linear) functional responses) and of season (winter, summer) on lynx kill rate. Additionally, we analysed the growth rate in a roe deer population from 1985 to 2005 in an area, which lynx naturally re-colonized in 1996. The annual roe deer growth rate was lower after lynx re-colonized the study area, but it was also negatively influenced by roe deer density. Before lynx colonized the area roe deer growth rate was λ = 1.079 (± 0.061 S.E.), while after lynx re-colonization it was λ = 0.94 (± 0.051 S.E.). Thus, the growth rate in the roe deer population decreased by Δλ = 0.14 (± 0.080 S.E.) after lynx re-colonized the study area, which corresponded to the estimated lynx predation rate on roe deer (0.11 ± 0.042 S.E.), suggesting that lynx predation was mainly additive to other mortality in roe deer. To conclude, this study suggests that lynx predation together with density dependent factors both influence the roe deer population dynamics. Thus, both top-down and bottom-up processes operated at the same time in this predator-prey system. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373782/ /pubmed/25806949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120570 Text en © 2015 Andrén, Liberg http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andrén, Henrik
Liberg, Olof
Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title_full Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title_fullStr Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title_short Large Impact of Eurasian Lynx Predation on Roe Deer Population Dynamics
title_sort large impact of eurasian lynx predation on roe deer population dynamics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120570
work_keys_str_mv AT andrenhenrik largeimpactofeurasianlynxpredationonroedeerpopulationdynamics
AT libergolof largeimpactofeurasianlynxpredationonroedeerpopulationdynamics