Cargando…

Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between sitting time and low back pain (LBP) have found contrasting results. This may be due to the lack of objectively measured sitting time or because socioeconomic confounders were not considered in the analysis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Nidhi, Christiansen, Caroline Stordal, Hallman, David M., Korshøj, Mette, Carneiro, Isabella Gomes, Holtermann, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121159
_version_ 1782363404851216384
author Gupta, Nidhi
Christiansen, Caroline Stordal
Hallman, David M.
Korshøj, Mette
Carneiro, Isabella Gomes
Holtermann, Andreas
author_facet Gupta, Nidhi
Christiansen, Caroline Stordal
Hallman, David M.
Korshøj, Mette
Carneiro, Isabella Gomes
Holtermann, Andreas
author_sort Gupta, Nidhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between sitting time and low back pain (LBP) have found contrasting results. This may be due to the lack of objectively measured sitting time or because socioeconomic confounders were not considered in the analysis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between objectively measured sitting time (daily total, and occupational and leisure-time periods) and LBP among blue-collar workers. METHODS: Two-hundred-and-one blue-collar workers wore two accelerometers (GT3X+ Actigraph) for up to four consecutive working days to obtain objective measures of sitting time, estimated via Acti4 software. Workers reported their LBP intensity the past month on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 9 (worst imaginable pain) and were categorized into either low (≤5) or high (>5) LBP intensity groups. In the multivariate-adjusted binary logistic regression analysis, total sitting time, and occupational and leisure-time sitting were both modeled as continuous (hours/day) and categorical variables (i.e. low, moderate and high sitting time). RESULTS: The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant positive association between total sitting time (per hour) and high LBP intensity (odds ratio; OR=1.43, 95%CI=1.15-1.77, P=0.01). Similar results were obtained for leisure-time sitting (OR=1.45, 95%CI=1.10-1.91, P=0.01), and a similar but non-significant trend was obtained for occupational sitting time (OR=1.34, 95%CI 0.99-1.82, P=0.06). In the analysis on categorized sitting time, high sitting time was positively associated with high LBP for total (OR=3.31, 95%CI=1.18-9.28, P=0.03), leisure (OR=5.31, 95%CI=1.57-17.90, P=0.01), and occupational (OR=3.26, 95%CI=0.89-11.98, P=0.08) periods, referencing those with low sitting time. CONCLUSION: Sitting time is positively associated with LBP intensity among blue-collar workers. Future studies using a prospective design with objective measures of sitting time are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43738882015-03-27 Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study Gupta, Nidhi Christiansen, Caroline Stordal Hallman, David M. Korshøj, Mette Carneiro, Isabella Gomes Holtermann, Andreas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between sitting time and low back pain (LBP) have found contrasting results. This may be due to the lack of objectively measured sitting time or because socioeconomic confounders were not considered in the analysis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between objectively measured sitting time (daily total, and occupational and leisure-time periods) and LBP among blue-collar workers. METHODS: Two-hundred-and-one blue-collar workers wore two accelerometers (GT3X+ Actigraph) for up to four consecutive working days to obtain objective measures of sitting time, estimated via Acti4 software. Workers reported their LBP intensity the past month on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 9 (worst imaginable pain) and were categorized into either low (≤5) or high (>5) LBP intensity groups. In the multivariate-adjusted binary logistic regression analysis, total sitting time, and occupational and leisure-time sitting were both modeled as continuous (hours/day) and categorical variables (i.e. low, moderate and high sitting time). RESULTS: The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant positive association between total sitting time (per hour) and high LBP intensity (odds ratio; OR=1.43, 95%CI=1.15-1.77, P=0.01). Similar results were obtained for leisure-time sitting (OR=1.45, 95%CI=1.10-1.91, P=0.01), and a similar but non-significant trend was obtained for occupational sitting time (OR=1.34, 95%CI 0.99-1.82, P=0.06). In the analysis on categorized sitting time, high sitting time was positively associated with high LBP for total (OR=3.31, 95%CI=1.18-9.28, P=0.03), leisure (OR=5.31, 95%CI=1.57-17.90, P=0.01), and occupational (OR=3.26, 95%CI=0.89-11.98, P=0.08) periods, referencing those with low sitting time. CONCLUSION: Sitting time is positively associated with LBP intensity among blue-collar workers. Future studies using a prospective design with objective measures of sitting time are recommended. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373888/ /pubmed/25806808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121159 Text en © 2015 Gupta et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gupta, Nidhi
Christiansen, Caroline Stordal
Hallman, David M.
Korshøj, Mette
Carneiro, Isabella Gomes
Holtermann, Andreas
Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title_full Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title_fullStr Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title_full_unstemmed Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title_short Is Objectively Measured Sitting Time Associated with Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Investigation in the NOMAD study
title_sort is objectively measured sitting time associated with low back pain? a cross-sectional investigation in the nomad study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121159
work_keys_str_mv AT guptanidhi isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy
AT christiansencarolinestordal isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy
AT hallmandavidm isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy
AT korshøjmette isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy
AT carneiroisabellagomes isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy
AT holtermannandreas isobjectivelymeasuredsittingtimeassociatedwithlowbackpainacrosssectionalinvestigationinthenomadstudy