Cargando…

Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness

Roadways pose serious threats to animal populations. The installation of roadway mitigation measures is becoming increasingly common, yet studies that rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of these conservation tools remain rare. A highway expansion project in Ontario, Canada included exclusion fenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baxter-Gilbert, James H., Riley, Julia L., Lesbarrères, David, Litzgus, Jacqueline D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120537
_version_ 1782363408515989504
author Baxter-Gilbert, James H.
Riley, Julia L.
Lesbarrères, David
Litzgus, Jacqueline D.
author_facet Baxter-Gilbert, James H.
Riley, Julia L.
Lesbarrères, David
Litzgus, Jacqueline D.
author_sort Baxter-Gilbert, James H.
collection PubMed
description Roadways pose serious threats to animal populations. The installation of roadway mitigation measures is becoming increasingly common, yet studies that rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of these conservation tools remain rare. A highway expansion project in Ontario, Canada included exclusion fencing and ecopassages as mitigation measures designed to offset detrimental effects to one of the most imperial groups of vertebrates, reptiles. Taking a multispecies approach, we used a Before-After-Control-Impact study design to compare reptile abundance on the highway before and after mitigation at an Impact site and a Control site from 1 May to 31 August in 2012 and 2013. During this time, radio telemetry, wildlife cameras, and an automated PIT-tag reading system were used to monitor reptile movements and use of ecopassages. Additionally, a willingness to utilize experiment was conducted to quantify turtle behavioral responses to ecopassages. We found no difference in abundance of turtles on the road between the un-mitigated and mitigated highways, and an increase in the percentage of both snakes and turtles detected dead on the road post-mitigation, suggesting that the fencing was not effective. Although ecopassages were used by reptiles, the number of crossings through ecopassages was lower than road-surface crossings. Furthermore, turtle willingness to use ecopassages was lower than that reported in previous arena studies, suggesting that effectiveness of ecopassages may be compromised when alternative crossing options are available (e.g., through holes in exclusion structures). Our rigorous evaluation of reptile roadway mitigation demonstrated that when exclusion structures fail, the effectiveness of population connectivity structures is compromised. Our project emphasizes the need to design mitigation measures with the biology and behavior of the target species in mind, to implement mitigation designs in a rigorous fashion, and quantitatively evaluate road mitigation to ensure allow for adaptive management and optimization of these increasingly important conservation tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43739042015-03-27 Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness Baxter-Gilbert, James H. Riley, Julia L. Lesbarrères, David Litzgus, Jacqueline D. PLoS One Research Article Roadways pose serious threats to animal populations. The installation of roadway mitigation measures is becoming increasingly common, yet studies that rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of these conservation tools remain rare. A highway expansion project in Ontario, Canada included exclusion fencing and ecopassages as mitigation measures designed to offset detrimental effects to one of the most imperial groups of vertebrates, reptiles. Taking a multispecies approach, we used a Before-After-Control-Impact study design to compare reptile abundance on the highway before and after mitigation at an Impact site and a Control site from 1 May to 31 August in 2012 and 2013. During this time, radio telemetry, wildlife cameras, and an automated PIT-tag reading system were used to monitor reptile movements and use of ecopassages. Additionally, a willingness to utilize experiment was conducted to quantify turtle behavioral responses to ecopassages. We found no difference in abundance of turtles on the road between the un-mitigated and mitigated highways, and an increase in the percentage of both snakes and turtles detected dead on the road post-mitigation, suggesting that the fencing was not effective. Although ecopassages were used by reptiles, the number of crossings through ecopassages was lower than road-surface crossings. Furthermore, turtle willingness to use ecopassages was lower than that reported in previous arena studies, suggesting that effectiveness of ecopassages may be compromised when alternative crossing options are available (e.g., through holes in exclusion structures). Our rigorous evaluation of reptile roadway mitigation demonstrated that when exclusion structures fail, the effectiveness of population connectivity structures is compromised. Our project emphasizes the need to design mitigation measures with the biology and behavior of the target species in mind, to implement mitigation designs in a rigorous fashion, and quantitatively evaluate road mitigation to ensure allow for adaptive management and optimization of these increasingly important conservation tools. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373904/ /pubmed/25806531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120537 Text en © 2015 Baxter-Gilbert et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baxter-Gilbert, James H.
Riley, Julia L.
Lesbarrères, David
Litzgus, Jacqueline D.
Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title_full Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title_fullStr Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title_short Mitigating Reptile Road Mortality: Fence Failures Compromise Ecopassage Effectiveness
title_sort mitigating reptile road mortality: fence failures compromise ecopassage effectiveness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120537
work_keys_str_mv AT baxtergilbertjamesh mitigatingreptileroadmortalityfencefailurescompromiseecopassageeffectiveness
AT rileyjulial mitigatingreptileroadmortalityfencefailurescompromiseecopassageeffectiveness
AT lesbarreresdavid mitigatingreptileroadmortalityfencefailurescompromiseecopassageeffectiveness
AT litzgusjacquelined mitigatingreptileroadmortalityfencefailurescompromiseecopassageeffectiveness