Cargando…

Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms

Mechanically evoked reflexes have been postulated to be less sensitive to presynaptic inhibition (PSI) than the H-reflex. This has implications on investigations of spinal cord neurophysiology that are based on the T-reflex. Preceding studies have shown an enhanced effect of PSI on the H-reflex when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mezzarane, Rinaldo André, Magalhães, Fernando Henrique, Chaud, Vitor Martins, Elias, Leonardo Abdala, Kohn, André Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121496
_version_ 1782363408978411520
author Mezzarane, Rinaldo André
Magalhães, Fernando Henrique
Chaud, Vitor Martins
Elias, Leonardo Abdala
Kohn, André Fabio
author_facet Mezzarane, Rinaldo André
Magalhães, Fernando Henrique
Chaud, Vitor Martins
Elias, Leonardo Abdala
Kohn, André Fabio
author_sort Mezzarane, Rinaldo André
collection PubMed
description Mechanically evoked reflexes have been postulated to be less sensitive to presynaptic inhibition (PSI) than the H-reflex. This has implications on investigations of spinal cord neurophysiology that are based on the T-reflex. Preceding studies have shown an enhanced effect of PSI on the H-reflex when a train of ~10 conditioning stimuli at 1 Hz was applied to the nerve of the antagonist muscle. The main questions to be addressed in the present study are if indeed T-reflexes are less sensitive to PSI and whether (and to what extent and by what possible mechanisms) the effect of low frequency conditioning, found previously for the H-reflex, can be reproduced on T-reflexes from the soleus muscle. We explored two different conditioning-to-test (C-T) intervals: 15 and 100 ms (corresponding to D1 and D2 inhibitions, respectively). Test stimuli consisted of either electrical pulses applied to the posterior tibial nerve to elicit H-reflexes or mechanical percussion to the Achilles tendon to elicit T-reflexes. The 1 Hz train of conditioning electrical stimuli delivered to the common peroneal nerve induced a stronger effect of PSI as compared to a single conditioning pulse, for both reflexes (T and H), regardless of C-T-intervals. Moreover, the conditioning train of pulses (with respect to a single conditioning pulse) was proportionally more effective for T-reflexes as compared to H-reflexes (irrespective of the C-T interval), which might be associated with the differential contingent of Ia afferents activated by mechanical and electrical test stimuli. A conceivable explanation for the enhanced PSI effect in response to a train of stimuli is the occurrence of homosynaptic depression at synapses on inhibitory interneurons interposed within the PSI pathway. The present results add to the discussion of the sensitivity of the stretch reflex pathway to PSI and its functional role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43739062015-03-27 Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms Mezzarane, Rinaldo André Magalhães, Fernando Henrique Chaud, Vitor Martins Elias, Leonardo Abdala Kohn, André Fabio PLoS One Research Article Mechanically evoked reflexes have been postulated to be less sensitive to presynaptic inhibition (PSI) than the H-reflex. This has implications on investigations of spinal cord neurophysiology that are based on the T-reflex. Preceding studies have shown an enhanced effect of PSI on the H-reflex when a train of ~10 conditioning stimuli at 1 Hz was applied to the nerve of the antagonist muscle. The main questions to be addressed in the present study are if indeed T-reflexes are less sensitive to PSI and whether (and to what extent and by what possible mechanisms) the effect of low frequency conditioning, found previously for the H-reflex, can be reproduced on T-reflexes from the soleus muscle. We explored two different conditioning-to-test (C-T) intervals: 15 and 100 ms (corresponding to D1 and D2 inhibitions, respectively). Test stimuli consisted of either electrical pulses applied to the posterior tibial nerve to elicit H-reflexes or mechanical percussion to the Achilles tendon to elicit T-reflexes. The 1 Hz train of conditioning electrical stimuli delivered to the common peroneal nerve induced a stronger effect of PSI as compared to a single conditioning pulse, for both reflexes (T and H), regardless of C-T-intervals. Moreover, the conditioning train of pulses (with respect to a single conditioning pulse) was proportionally more effective for T-reflexes as compared to H-reflexes (irrespective of the C-T interval), which might be associated with the differential contingent of Ia afferents activated by mechanical and electrical test stimuli. A conceivable explanation for the enhanced PSI effect in response to a train of stimuli is the occurrence of homosynaptic depression at synapses on inhibitory interneurons interposed within the PSI pathway. The present results add to the discussion of the sensitivity of the stretch reflex pathway to PSI and its functional role. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373906/ /pubmed/25807195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121496 Text en © 2015 Mezzarane et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mezzarane, Rinaldo André
Magalhães, Fernando Henrique
Chaud, Vitor Martins
Elias, Leonardo Abdala
Kohn, André Fabio
Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title_full Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title_fullStr Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title_short Enhanced D1 and D2 Inhibitions Induced by Low-Frequency Trains of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects on H- and T-Reflexes and Possible Mechanisms
title_sort enhanced d1 and d2 inhibitions induced by low-frequency trains of conditioning stimuli: differential effects on h- and t-reflexes and possible mechanisms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121496
work_keys_str_mv AT mezzaranerinaldoandre enhancedd1andd2inhibitionsinducedbylowfrequencytrainsofconditioningstimulidifferentialeffectsonhandtreflexesandpossiblemechanisms
AT magalhaesfernandohenrique enhancedd1andd2inhibitionsinducedbylowfrequencytrainsofconditioningstimulidifferentialeffectsonhandtreflexesandpossiblemechanisms
AT chaudvitormartins enhancedd1andd2inhibitionsinducedbylowfrequencytrainsofconditioningstimulidifferentialeffectsonhandtreflexesandpossiblemechanisms
AT eliasleonardoabdala enhancedd1andd2inhibitionsinducedbylowfrequencytrainsofconditioningstimulidifferentialeffectsonhandtreflexesandpossiblemechanisms
AT kohnandrefabio enhancedd1andd2inhibitionsinducedbylowfrequencytrainsofconditioningstimulidifferentialeffectsonhandtreflexesandpossiblemechanisms