Cargando…
Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the ca...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312 |
_version_ | 1782363421458563072 |
---|---|
author | Gregorius, Hans-Rolf Gillet, Elizabeth M. |
author_facet | Gregorius, Hans-Rolf Gillet, Elizabeth M. |
author_sort | Gregorius, Hans-Rolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the categories of dispersion and diversity, and within metacommunities into the categories of compositional differentiation and partitioning of variation. There are essentially two approaches to characterizing the distribution of trait variation over communities in that individuals with the same trait state or type tend to occur in the same community (describes differentiation tendencies), and individuals with different types tend to occur in different communities (describes apportionment tendencies). Both approaches can be viewed from the dual perspectives of trait variation distributed over communities (CT perspective) and community membership distributed over trait states (TC perspective). This classification covers most of the relevant descriptors (qualified measures) of biological variation, as is demonstrated with the help of major families of descriptors. Moreover, the classification is shown to open ways to develop new descriptors that meet current needs. Yet the classification also reveals the misclassification of some prominent and widely applied descriptors: Dispersion is often misclassified as diversity, particularly in cases where dispersion descriptor allow for the computation of effective numbers; the descriptor G(ST) of population genetics is commonly misclassified as compositional differentiation and confused with partitioning-oriented differentiation, whereas it actually measures partitioning-oriented apportionment; descriptors of β-diversity are ambiguous about the differentiation effects they are supposed to represent and therefore require conceptual reconsideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4373960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43739602015-03-27 Classifying Measures of Biological Variation Gregorius, Hans-Rolf Gillet, Elizabeth M. PLoS One Research Article Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the categories of dispersion and diversity, and within metacommunities into the categories of compositional differentiation and partitioning of variation. There are essentially two approaches to characterizing the distribution of trait variation over communities in that individuals with the same trait state or type tend to occur in the same community (describes differentiation tendencies), and individuals with different types tend to occur in different communities (describes apportionment tendencies). Both approaches can be viewed from the dual perspectives of trait variation distributed over communities (CT perspective) and community membership distributed over trait states (TC perspective). This classification covers most of the relevant descriptors (qualified measures) of biological variation, as is demonstrated with the help of major families of descriptors. Moreover, the classification is shown to open ways to develop new descriptors that meet current needs. Yet the classification also reveals the misclassification of some prominent and widely applied descriptors: Dispersion is often misclassified as diversity, particularly in cases where dispersion descriptor allow for the computation of effective numbers; the descriptor G(ST) of population genetics is commonly misclassified as compositional differentiation and confused with partitioning-oriented differentiation, whereas it actually measures partitioning-oriented apportionment; descriptors of β-diversity are ambiguous about the differentiation effects they are supposed to represent and therefore require conceptual reconsideration. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373960/ /pubmed/25807558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312 Text en © 2015 Gregorius, Gillet http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gregorius, Hans-Rolf Gillet, Elizabeth M. Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title | Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title_full | Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title_fullStr | Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title_full_unstemmed | Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title_short | Classifying Measures of Biological Variation |
title_sort | classifying measures of biological variation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregoriushansrolf classifyingmeasuresofbiologicalvariation AT gilletelizabethm classifyingmeasuresofbiologicalvariation |