Cargando…

Classifying Measures of Biological Variation

Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregorius, Hans-Rolf, Gillet, Elizabeth M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312
_version_ 1782363421458563072
author Gregorius, Hans-Rolf
Gillet, Elizabeth M.
author_facet Gregorius, Hans-Rolf
Gillet, Elizabeth M.
author_sort Gregorius, Hans-Rolf
collection PubMed
description Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the categories of dispersion and diversity, and within metacommunities into the categories of compositional differentiation and partitioning of variation. There are essentially two approaches to characterizing the distribution of trait variation over communities in that individuals with the same trait state or type tend to occur in the same community (describes differentiation tendencies), and individuals with different types tend to occur in different communities (describes apportionment tendencies). Both approaches can be viewed from the dual perspectives of trait variation distributed over communities (CT perspective) and community membership distributed over trait states (TC perspective). This classification covers most of the relevant descriptors (qualified measures) of biological variation, as is demonstrated with the help of major families of descriptors. Moreover, the classification is shown to open ways to develop new descriptors that meet current needs. Yet the classification also reveals the misclassification of some prominent and widely applied descriptors: Dispersion is often misclassified as diversity, particularly in cases where dispersion descriptor allow for the computation of effective numbers; the descriptor G(ST) of population genetics is commonly misclassified as compositional differentiation and confused with partitioning-oriented differentiation, whereas it actually measures partitioning-oriented apportionment; descriptors of β-diversity are ambiguous about the differentiation effects they are supposed to represent and therefore require conceptual reconsideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4373960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43739602015-03-27 Classifying Measures of Biological Variation Gregorius, Hans-Rolf Gillet, Elizabeth M. PLoS One Research Article Biological variation is commonly measured at two basic levels: variation within individual communities, and the distribution of variation over communities or within a metacommunity. We develop a classification for the measurement of biological variation on both levels: Within communities into the categories of dispersion and diversity, and within metacommunities into the categories of compositional differentiation and partitioning of variation. There are essentially two approaches to characterizing the distribution of trait variation over communities in that individuals with the same trait state or type tend to occur in the same community (describes differentiation tendencies), and individuals with different types tend to occur in different communities (describes apportionment tendencies). Both approaches can be viewed from the dual perspectives of trait variation distributed over communities (CT perspective) and community membership distributed over trait states (TC perspective). This classification covers most of the relevant descriptors (qualified measures) of biological variation, as is demonstrated with the help of major families of descriptors. Moreover, the classification is shown to open ways to develop new descriptors that meet current needs. Yet the classification also reveals the misclassification of some prominent and widely applied descriptors: Dispersion is often misclassified as diversity, particularly in cases where dispersion descriptor allow for the computation of effective numbers; the descriptor G(ST) of population genetics is commonly misclassified as compositional differentiation and confused with partitioning-oriented differentiation, whereas it actually measures partitioning-oriented apportionment; descriptors of β-diversity are ambiguous about the differentiation effects they are supposed to represent and therefore require conceptual reconsideration. Public Library of Science 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4373960/ /pubmed/25807558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312 Text en © 2015 Gregorius, Gillet http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gregorius, Hans-Rolf
Gillet, Elizabeth M.
Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title_full Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title_fullStr Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title_full_unstemmed Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title_short Classifying Measures of Biological Variation
title_sort classifying measures of biological variation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25807558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115312
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoriushansrolf classifyingmeasuresofbiologicalvariation
AT gilletelizabethm classifyingmeasuresofbiologicalvariation