Cargando…

A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has demonstrated a correlation among patient preferences, dosing burden, and medication nonadherence, a well-recognized challenge in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to elicit preferences for alternative dosing regimens for oral antihyp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauber, A. Brett, Tunceli, Kaan, Yang, Jui-Chen, Gantz, Ira, Brodovicz, Kimberly G., Alexander, Charles M., Davies, Michael J., Radican, Larry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2
_version_ 1782363427411329024
author Hauber, A. Brett
Tunceli, Kaan
Yang, Jui-Chen
Gantz, Ira
Brodovicz, Kimberly G.
Alexander, Charles M.
Davies, Michael J.
Radican, Larry
author_facet Hauber, A. Brett
Tunceli, Kaan
Yang, Jui-Chen
Gantz, Ira
Brodovicz, Kimberly G.
Alexander, Charles M.
Davies, Michael J.
Radican, Larry
author_sort Hauber, A. Brett
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Previous research has demonstrated a correlation among patient preferences, dosing burden, and medication nonadherence, a well-recognized challenge in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to elicit preferences for alternative dosing regimens for oral antihyperglycemic therapies among patients with T2DM and to quantify differences in dosing preferences among patients with different characteristics. METHODS: Preferences for dosing of oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OAD) were evaluated by surveying patients with T2DM in the United States (US). Survey participants were adult US patients with T2DM who were taking no or only 1 OAD and no injectable therapies. Each patient completed a web-enabled discrete-choice experiment (DCE) including a series of 8 pairs of hypothetical OAD profiles. Each profile was defined by reductions in average glucose, dosing schedule (e.g., once-weekly, once-daily, or twice-daily dosing), chance of mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects, frequency of hypoglycemia, weight change, incremental risk of congestive heart failure, and cost. Each participant also answered a direct question about dosing preference. Random-parameters logit was used to analyze the DCE data. Prespecified subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,262 patients invited to participate, 923 were included in the analysis (mean age 63 years, 45% male, 79% white). Reducing dosing frequency was statistically significantly important to patients; however, it was relatively less important than medication cost or clinical outcomes. On average, patients preferred once-weekly to once-daily dosing. Patients not currently taking an OAD had a stronger preference for once-weekly dosing than patients on treatment (P = 0.012). Patients younger than 45 years had a stronger preference for weekly dosing than older patients (P < 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: For younger patients and patients not currently on treatment, once-weekly dosing may provide additional incentive to initiate and adhere to antihyperglycemic treatment; however, additional research will be required to confirm this hypothesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43740802015-03-30 A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Hauber, A. Brett Tunceli, Kaan Yang, Jui-Chen Gantz, Ira Brodovicz, Kimberly G. Alexander, Charles M. Davies, Michael J. Radican, Larry Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Previous research has demonstrated a correlation among patient preferences, dosing burden, and medication nonadherence, a well-recognized challenge in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to elicit preferences for alternative dosing regimens for oral antihyperglycemic therapies among patients with T2DM and to quantify differences in dosing preferences among patients with different characteristics. METHODS: Preferences for dosing of oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OAD) were evaluated by surveying patients with T2DM in the United States (US). Survey participants were adult US patients with T2DM who were taking no or only 1 OAD and no injectable therapies. Each patient completed a web-enabled discrete-choice experiment (DCE) including a series of 8 pairs of hypothetical OAD profiles. Each profile was defined by reductions in average glucose, dosing schedule (e.g., once-weekly, once-daily, or twice-daily dosing), chance of mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects, frequency of hypoglycemia, weight change, incremental risk of congestive heart failure, and cost. Each participant also answered a direct question about dosing preference. Random-parameters logit was used to analyze the DCE data. Prespecified subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,262 patients invited to participate, 923 were included in the analysis (mean age 63 years, 45% male, 79% white). Reducing dosing frequency was statistically significantly important to patients; however, it was relatively less important than medication cost or clinical outcomes. On average, patients preferred once-weekly to once-daily dosing. Patients not currently taking an OAD had a stronger preference for once-weekly dosing than patients on treatment (P = 0.012). Patients younger than 45 years had a stronger preference for weekly dosing than older patients (P < 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: For younger patients and patients not currently on treatment, once-weekly dosing may provide additional incentive to initiate and adhere to antihyperglycemic treatment; however, additional research will be required to confirm this hypothesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-01-14 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4374080/ /pubmed/25586555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hauber, A. Brett
Tunceli, Kaan
Yang, Jui-Chen
Gantz, Ira
Brodovicz, Kimberly G.
Alexander, Charles M.
Davies, Michael J.
Radican, Larry
A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_fullStr A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_short A Survey of Patient Preferences for Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
title_sort survey of patient preferences for oral antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-015-0094-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hauberabrett asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tuncelikaan asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT yangjuichen asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT gantzira asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT brodoviczkimberlyg asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT alexandercharlesm asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT daviesmichaelj asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT radicanlarry asurveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT hauberabrett surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tuncelikaan surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT yangjuichen surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT gantzira surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT brodoviczkimberlyg surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT alexandercharlesm surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT daviesmichaelj surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT radicanlarry surveyofpatientpreferencesfororalantihyperglycemictherapyinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitus