Cargando…
Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials?
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often have more than one primary outcome and frequently have secondary and harm outcomes. Comparison of outcomes between study arms is the primary focus of RCTs, but there are times when the relation between outcomes is important, such as determining w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6 |
_version_ | 1782363438627946496 |
---|---|
author | Schriger, David L Cooper, Richelle J Lopez-O’Sullivan, Ana Wystrach, Carter Altman, Douglas G |
author_facet | Schriger, David L Cooper, Richelle J Lopez-O’Sullivan, Ana Wystrach, Carter Altman, Douglas G |
author_sort | Schriger, David L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often have more than one primary outcome and frequently have secondary and harm outcomes. Comparison of outcomes between study arms is the primary focus of RCTs, but there are times when the relation between outcomes is important, such as determining whether an intermediate outcome and a clinical outcome have a strong association. We sought to determine how often reports of RCTs depict the relations among outcomes at the individual patient level and, for those studies that use composite outcomes, how often the relations between component elements are depicted. METHODS: We selected 20 general, specialty and subspecialty medical journals with high impact factors that publish original clinical research. We identified every RCT in the 2011 and 2012 issues and randomly selected 10 articles per journal. For each article we recorded the number of outcomes, the number of composite outcomes and how often the relations between outcomes or elements of composite outcomes were portrayed. RESULTS: All but 16 of the 200 RCTs had more than one outcome. Thus, outcomes could have been related in 92% of studies, but such relations were only reported in 2 (1%). A total of 33 (17%) investigations measured a composite outcome, 32 of which showed data for each component. None, however, showed cross-tabulation of the components. CONCLUSIONS: Readers are rarely shown the relation between outcomes. Mandatory posting of datasets or requirements for detailed appendices would allow readers to see these cross-tabulations, helping future investigators know which outcomes are redundant, which provide unique information and which are most responsive to changes in the independent variables. While not every relationship between outcomes requires depiction, at present such information is seldom portrayed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4374175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43741752015-03-27 Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? Schriger, David L Cooper, Richelle J Lopez-O’Sullivan, Ana Wystrach, Carter Altman, Douglas G Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often have more than one primary outcome and frequently have secondary and harm outcomes. Comparison of outcomes between study arms is the primary focus of RCTs, but there are times when the relation between outcomes is important, such as determining whether an intermediate outcome and a clinical outcome have a strong association. We sought to determine how often reports of RCTs depict the relations among outcomes at the individual patient level and, for those studies that use composite outcomes, how often the relations between component elements are depicted. METHODS: We selected 20 general, specialty and subspecialty medical journals with high impact factors that publish original clinical research. We identified every RCT in the 2011 and 2012 issues and randomly selected 10 articles per journal. For each article we recorded the number of outcomes, the number of composite outcomes and how often the relations between outcomes or elements of composite outcomes were portrayed. RESULTS: All but 16 of the 200 RCTs had more than one outcome. Thus, outcomes could have been related in 92% of studies, but such relations were only reported in 2 (1%). A total of 33 (17%) investigations measured a composite outcome, 32 of which showed data for each component. None, however, showed cross-tabulation of the components. CONCLUSIONS: Readers are rarely shown the relation between outcomes. Mandatory posting of datasets or requirements for detailed appendices would allow readers to see these cross-tabulations, helping future investigators know which outcomes are redundant, which provide unique information and which are most responsive to changes in the independent variables. While not every relationship between outcomes requires depiction, at present such information is seldom portrayed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4374175/ /pubmed/25886370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6 Text en © Schriger et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Schriger, David L Cooper, Richelle J Lopez-O’Sullivan, Ana Wystrach, Carter Altman, Douglas G Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title | Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title_full | Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title_fullStr | Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title_short | Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
title_sort | is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schrigerdavidl istherelationshipamongoutcomevariablesshowninrandomizedtrials AT cooperrichellej istherelationshipamongoutcomevariablesshowninrandomizedtrials AT lopezosullivanana istherelationshipamongoutcomevariablesshowninrandomizedtrials AT wystrachcarter istherelationshipamongoutcomevariablesshowninrandomizedtrials AT altmandouglasg istherelationshipamongoutcomevariablesshowninrandomizedtrials |