Cargando…

Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions

BACKGROUND: Habit is defined as a process whereby an impulse towards behaviour is automatically initiated upon encountering a setting in which the behaviour has been performed in the past. A central tenet of habit theory is that habit overrides intentional tendencies in directing behaviour, such tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardner, Benjamin, Corbridge, Sharon, McGowan, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25870763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0065-4
_version_ 1782363442305302528
author Gardner, Benjamin
Corbridge, Sharon
McGowan, Laura
author_facet Gardner, Benjamin
Corbridge, Sharon
McGowan, Laura
author_sort Gardner, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Habit is defined as a process whereby an impulse towards behaviour is automatically initiated upon encountering a setting in which the behaviour has been performed in the past. A central tenet of habit theory is that habit overrides intentional tendencies in directing behaviour, such that as habit strength increases, intention becomes less predictive of behaviour. Yet, evidence of this effect has been methodologically limited by modelling the impact of positively-correlated habits and intentions. This study sought to test the effect of habits for unhealthy snacking on the relationship between intentions to avoid unhealthy snacks and snack intake. METHODS: Methods were chosen to match those used in studies that have shown habit-intention interactions. 239 adults completed valid and reliable measures of habitual snacking and intention to avoid snacking at baseline, and a self-report measure of snack intake two weeks later. Data were analysed using multiple regression. RESULTS: While both habit and intention independently predicted snack intake, no interaction between habit and intention was found. CONCLUSIONS: No support was found for the expected moderating impact of habit on the intention-behaviour relationship, indicating that individuals with intentions can act on those intentions despite having habits. Previous evidence of a habit-intention interaction effect may be unreliable. A growing literature indicates that habitual tendencies can be inhibited, albeit with difficulty. Habits and intentions may vary in the influence they exert over discrete behaviour instances. While the aggregation of behaviours across instances and individuals used in our study reflects the dominant methodology in habit research, it precludes examination of effects of in-situ habits and intentions. More sophisticated data collection and analysis methods may be needed to better understand potential habit-intention interactions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0065-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43741912015-04-13 Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions Gardner, Benjamin Corbridge, Sharon McGowan, Laura BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Habit is defined as a process whereby an impulse towards behaviour is automatically initiated upon encountering a setting in which the behaviour has been performed in the past. A central tenet of habit theory is that habit overrides intentional tendencies in directing behaviour, such that as habit strength increases, intention becomes less predictive of behaviour. Yet, evidence of this effect has been methodologically limited by modelling the impact of positively-correlated habits and intentions. This study sought to test the effect of habits for unhealthy snacking on the relationship between intentions to avoid unhealthy snacks and snack intake. METHODS: Methods were chosen to match those used in studies that have shown habit-intention interactions. 239 adults completed valid and reliable measures of habitual snacking and intention to avoid snacking at baseline, and a self-report measure of snack intake two weeks later. Data were analysed using multiple regression. RESULTS: While both habit and intention independently predicted snack intake, no interaction between habit and intention was found. CONCLUSIONS: No support was found for the expected moderating impact of habit on the intention-behaviour relationship, indicating that individuals with intentions can act on those intentions despite having habits. Previous evidence of a habit-intention interaction effect may be unreliable. A growing literature indicates that habitual tendencies can be inhibited, albeit with difficulty. Habits and intentions may vary in the influence they exert over discrete behaviour instances. While the aggregation of behaviours across instances and individuals used in our study reflects the dominant methodology in habit research, it precludes examination of effects of in-situ habits and intentions. More sophisticated data collection and analysis methods may be needed to better understand potential habit-intention interactions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0065-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4374191/ /pubmed/25870763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0065-4 Text en © Gardner et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gardner, Benjamin
Corbridge, Sharon
McGowan, Laura
Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title_full Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title_fullStr Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title_full_unstemmed Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title_short Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
title_sort do habits always override intentions? pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25870763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0065-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnerbenjamin dohabitsalwaysoverrideintentionspittingunhealthysnackinghabitsagainstsnackavoidanceintentions
AT corbridgesharon dohabitsalwaysoverrideintentionspittingunhealthysnackinghabitsagainstsnackavoidanceintentions
AT mcgowanlaura dohabitsalwaysoverrideintentionspittingunhealthysnackinghabitsagainstsnackavoidanceintentions