Cargando…

Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox

BACKGROUND: The study of gait at self-selected speed is important. Traditional gait laboratories being relatively limited in space provide insufficient path length, while treadmill (TM) walking compromises natural gait by imposing speed variables. Self-paced (SP) walking can be realized on TM using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plotnik, Meir, Azrad, Tamar, Bondi, Moshe, Bahat, Yotam, Gimmon, Yoav, Zeilig, Gabriel, Inzelberg, Rivka, Siev-Ner, Itzhak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0002-z
_version_ 1782363464262483968
author Plotnik, Meir
Azrad, Tamar
Bondi, Moshe
Bahat, Yotam
Gimmon, Yoav
Zeilig, Gabriel
Inzelberg, Rivka
Siev-Ner, Itzhak
author_facet Plotnik, Meir
Azrad, Tamar
Bondi, Moshe
Bahat, Yotam
Gimmon, Yoav
Zeilig, Gabriel
Inzelberg, Rivka
Siev-Ner, Itzhak
author_sort Plotnik, Meir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study of gait at self-selected speed is important. Traditional gait laboratories being relatively limited in space provide insufficient path length, while treadmill (TM) walking compromises natural gait by imposing speed variables. Self-paced (SP) walking can be realized on TM using feedback-controlled belt speed. We compared over ground walking vs. SP TM in two self-selected gait speed experiments: without visual flow, and while subjects were immersed in a virtual reality (VR) environment inducing natural visual flow. METHODS: Young healthy subjects walked 96 meters at self-selected comfortable speed, first over ground and then on the SP TM without (n=15), and with VR visual flow (n=11). Gait speed was compared across conditions for four 10 m long segments (7.5 – 17.5, 30.5 – 40.5, 55.5 – 65.5 and 78.5-88.5 m). RESULTS: During over ground walking mean (± SD) gait speed was equal for both experimental groups (1.50 ± 0.13 m/s). Without visual flow, gait speed over SP TM was smaller in the first and second epochs as compared to over ground (first: 1.15 ±0.18 vs. second: 1.53 ± 0.13 m/s; p<0.05), and was comparable in the third and fourth (1.45 ± 0.19 vs. 1.49 ± 0.15 m/s; p>0.3). With visual flow, gait speed became comparable to that of over ground performance already in the first epoch (1.43 ± 0.22 m/s; p>0.17). Curve fitting analyses estimated that steady state velocity in SP TM walking is reached after shorter distanced passed with visual flow (24.6 ± 14.7 m) versus without (36.5 ± 18.7 m, not statistically significant; p=0.097). Steady state velocity was estimated to be higher in the presence of visual flow (1.61 ± 0.17 m/s) versus its absence (1.42 ± 1.19 m/s; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SP TM walking is a reliable method for recording typical self-selected gait speed, provided that sufficient distance is first passed for reaching steady state. Seemingly, in the presence of VR visual flow, steady state of gait speed is reached faster. We propose that the gait research community joins forces to standardize the use of SP TMs, e.g., by unifying protocols or gathering normative data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43742852015-03-27 Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox Plotnik, Meir Azrad, Tamar Bondi, Moshe Bahat, Yotam Gimmon, Yoav Zeilig, Gabriel Inzelberg, Rivka Siev-Ner, Itzhak J Neuroeng Rehabil Methodology BACKGROUND: The study of gait at self-selected speed is important. Traditional gait laboratories being relatively limited in space provide insufficient path length, while treadmill (TM) walking compromises natural gait by imposing speed variables. Self-paced (SP) walking can be realized on TM using feedback-controlled belt speed. We compared over ground walking vs. SP TM in two self-selected gait speed experiments: without visual flow, and while subjects were immersed in a virtual reality (VR) environment inducing natural visual flow. METHODS: Young healthy subjects walked 96 meters at self-selected comfortable speed, first over ground and then on the SP TM without (n=15), and with VR visual flow (n=11). Gait speed was compared across conditions for four 10 m long segments (7.5 – 17.5, 30.5 – 40.5, 55.5 – 65.5 and 78.5-88.5 m). RESULTS: During over ground walking mean (± SD) gait speed was equal for both experimental groups (1.50 ± 0.13 m/s). Without visual flow, gait speed over SP TM was smaller in the first and second epochs as compared to over ground (first: 1.15 ±0.18 vs. second: 1.53 ± 0.13 m/s; p<0.05), and was comparable in the third and fourth (1.45 ± 0.19 vs. 1.49 ± 0.15 m/s; p>0.3). With visual flow, gait speed became comparable to that of over ground performance already in the first epoch (1.43 ± 0.22 m/s; p>0.17). Curve fitting analyses estimated that steady state velocity in SP TM walking is reached after shorter distanced passed with visual flow (24.6 ± 14.7 m) versus without (36.5 ± 18.7 m, not statistically significant; p=0.097). Steady state velocity was estimated to be higher in the presence of visual flow (1.61 ± 0.17 m/s) versus its absence (1.42 ± 1.19 m/s; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SP TM walking is a reliable method for recording typical self-selected gait speed, provided that sufficient distance is first passed for reaching steady state. Seemingly, in the presence of VR visual flow, steady state of gait speed is reached faster. We propose that the gait research community joins forces to standardize the use of SP TMs, e.g., by unifying protocols or gathering normative data. BioMed Central 2015-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4374285/ /pubmed/25881130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0002-z Text en © Plotnik et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Plotnik, Meir
Azrad, Tamar
Bondi, Moshe
Bahat, Yotam
Gimmon, Yoav
Zeilig, Gabriel
Inzelberg, Rivka
Siev-Ner, Itzhak
Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title_full Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title_fullStr Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title_full_unstemmed Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title_short Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
title_sort self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0002-z
work_keys_str_mv AT plotnikmeir selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT azradtamar selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT bondimoshe selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT bahatyotam selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT gimmonyoav selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT zeiliggabriel selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT inzelbergrivka selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox
AT sievneritzhak selfselectedgaitspeedovergroundversusselfpacedtreadmillwalkingasolutionforaparadox