Cargando…

What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness

BACKGROUND: Many butterflies possess striking structures called eyespots on their wings, and several studies have sought to understand the selective forces that have shaped their evolution. Work over the last decade has shown that a major function of eyespots is their ability to reduce predation by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukherjee, Ritwika, Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0307-3
_version_ 1782363478713958400
author Mukherjee, Ritwika
Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa
author_facet Mukherjee, Ritwika
Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa
author_sort Mukherjee, Ritwika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many butterflies possess striking structures called eyespots on their wings, and several studies have sought to understand the selective forces that have shaped their evolution. Work over the last decade has shown that a major function of eyespots is their ability to reduce predation by being intimidating to attacking predators. Two competing hypotheses seek to explain the cause of intimidation, one suggesting ‘eye-mimicry’ and the other their ‘conspicuousness’ as the reason. There is an on-going debate about which of these better explains the effectiveness of eyespots against predation. We undertook a series of indoor experiments to understand the relative importance of conspicuousness and eye-mimicry, and therefore how predator perception may have influenced the evolution of eyespots. We conducted choice tests where artificial paper models mimicking Junonia almana butterflies were presented to chickens and their preference of attack recorded. RESULTS: We first established that birds avoided models with a pair of eyespots. However, contrary to previous, outdoor experiments, we found that the total area of eyespots did not affect their effectiveness. Non-eye-like, fan shaped patterns derived from eyespots were found to be just as effective as eye-like circular patterns. Furthermore, we did not find a significant effect of symmetry of patterns, again in discordance with previous work. However, across all experiments, models with a pair of patterns, symmetric or asymmetric, eyelike or non-eye-like, suffered from fewer attacks compared with other models. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of pairedness of eyespots, and supports the hypothesis that two is a biologically significant number that is important in prey–predator signalling. We discuss the implications of our results for the understanding of eyespot evolution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0307-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43743702015-03-27 What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness Mukherjee, Ritwika Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Many butterflies possess striking structures called eyespots on their wings, and several studies have sought to understand the selective forces that have shaped their evolution. Work over the last decade has shown that a major function of eyespots is their ability to reduce predation by being intimidating to attacking predators. Two competing hypotheses seek to explain the cause of intimidation, one suggesting ‘eye-mimicry’ and the other their ‘conspicuousness’ as the reason. There is an on-going debate about which of these better explains the effectiveness of eyespots against predation. We undertook a series of indoor experiments to understand the relative importance of conspicuousness and eye-mimicry, and therefore how predator perception may have influenced the evolution of eyespots. We conducted choice tests where artificial paper models mimicking Junonia almana butterflies were presented to chickens and their preference of attack recorded. RESULTS: We first established that birds avoided models with a pair of eyespots. However, contrary to previous, outdoor experiments, we found that the total area of eyespots did not affect their effectiveness. Non-eye-like, fan shaped patterns derived from eyespots were found to be just as effective as eye-like circular patterns. Furthermore, we did not find a significant effect of symmetry of patterns, again in discordance with previous work. However, across all experiments, models with a pair of patterns, symmetric or asymmetric, eyelike or non-eye-like, suffered from fewer attacks compared with other models. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of pairedness of eyespots, and supports the hypothesis that two is a biologically significant number that is important in prey–predator signalling. We discuss the implications of our results for the understanding of eyespot evolution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0307-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4374370/ /pubmed/25880640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0307-3 Text en © Mukherjee and Kodandaramaiah; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mukherjee, Ritwika
Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa
What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title_full What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title_fullStr What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title_full_unstemmed What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title_short What makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
title_sort what makes eyespots intimidating–the importance of pairedness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0307-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mukherjeeritwika whatmakeseyespotsintimidatingtheimportanceofpairedness
AT kodandaramaiahullasa whatmakeseyespotsintimidatingtheimportanceofpairedness