Cargando…

Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Zhi-Hui, Chen, Ping, Chen, Yan, He, Sheng-Dong, Ye, Ji-Ru, Zhang, Hong-Liang, Cao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25814921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-015-0033-z
_version_ 1782363479624122368
author He, Zhi-Hui
Chen, Ping
Chen, Yan
He, Sheng-Dong
Ye, Ji-Ru
Zhang, Hong-Liang
Cao, Jun
author_facet He, Zhi-Hui
Chen, Ping
Chen, Yan
He, Sheng-Dong
Ye, Ji-Ru
Zhang, Hong-Liang
Cao, Jun
author_sort He, Zhi-Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema model and intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced emphysema model to evaluate the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods. METHODS: Six-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were used and randomly divided into two groups: CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: control and CS or CSE. Lung function, mean linear intercept (MLI), destructive index (DI), apoptotic index (AI), total and differential cells count in broncholavolar lavage fluid (BALF), SOD and IL-6 concentration in serum were measured. RESULTS: Compared with their respective controls, lung function was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); MLI, DI, and AI of lung tissue were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); total number of leukocytes, the number and percentage of neutrophils (NEUs), and the number of macrophages (MAC) in BALF were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); SOD concentration in serum was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); IL-6 concentration in serum was significantly increased in in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between CS group and CSE group in any of the parameters described above. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE could induce emphysema and the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods were equal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43743742015-03-27 Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema He, Zhi-Hui Chen, Ping Chen, Yan He, Sheng-Dong Ye, Ji-Ru Zhang, Hong-Liang Cao, Jun Tob Induc Dis Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema model and intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced emphysema model to evaluate the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods. METHODS: Six-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were used and randomly divided into two groups: CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: control and CS or CSE. Lung function, mean linear intercept (MLI), destructive index (DI), apoptotic index (AI), total and differential cells count in broncholavolar lavage fluid (BALF), SOD and IL-6 concentration in serum were measured. RESULTS: Compared with their respective controls, lung function was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); MLI, DI, and AI of lung tissue were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); total number of leukocytes, the number and percentage of neutrophils (NEUs), and the number of macrophages (MAC) in BALF were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); SOD concentration in serum was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); IL-6 concentration in serum was significantly increased in in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between CS group and CSE group in any of the parameters described above. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE could induce emphysema and the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods were equal. BioMed Central 2015-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4374374/ /pubmed/25814921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-015-0033-z Text en © He et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
He, Zhi-Hui
Chen, Ping
Chen, Yan
He, Sheng-Dong
Ye, Ji-Ru
Zhang, Hong-Liang
Cao, Jun
Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_full Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_fullStr Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_short Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_sort comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25814921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-015-0033-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hezhihui comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT chenping comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT chenyan comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT heshengdong comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT yejiru comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT zhanghongliang comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT caojun comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema