Cargando…
Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer
BACKGROUND: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0 |
_version_ | 1782363504523608064 |
---|---|
author | Todenhöfer, Tilman Hennenlotter, Jörg Guttenberg, Philipp Mohrhardt, Sarah Kuehs, Ursula Esser, Michael Aufderklamm, Stefan Bier, Simone Harland, Niklas Rausch, Steffen Gakis, Georgios Stenzl, Arnulf Schwentner, Christian |
author_facet | Todenhöfer, Tilman Hennenlotter, Jörg Guttenberg, Philipp Mohrhardt, Sarah Kuehs, Ursula Esser, Michael Aufderklamm, Stefan Bier, Simone Harland, Niklas Rausch, Steffen Gakis, Georgios Stenzl, Arnulf Schwentner, Christian |
author_sort | Todenhöfer, Tilman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. RESULTS: Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4374530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43745302015-03-27 Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer Todenhöfer, Tilman Hennenlotter, Jörg Guttenberg, Philipp Mohrhardt, Sarah Kuehs, Ursula Esser, Michael Aufderklamm, Stefan Bier, Simone Harland, Niklas Rausch, Steffen Gakis, Georgios Stenzl, Arnulf Schwentner, Christian BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. RESULTS: Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients. BioMed Central 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4374530/ /pubmed/25884545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0 Text en © Todenhöfer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Todenhöfer, Tilman Hennenlotter, Jörg Guttenberg, Philipp Mohrhardt, Sarah Kuehs, Ursula Esser, Michael Aufderklamm, Stefan Bier, Simone Harland, Niklas Rausch, Steffen Gakis, Georgios Stenzl, Arnulf Schwentner, Christian Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title | Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title_full | Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title_short | Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
title_sort | prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT todenhofertilman prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT hennenlotterjorg prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT guttenbergphilipp prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT mohrhardtsarah prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT kuehsursula prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT essermichael prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT aufderklammstefan prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT biersimone prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT harlandniklas prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT rauschsteffen prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT gakisgeorgios prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT stenzlarnulf prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer AT schwentnerchristian prognosticrelevanceofpositiveurinemarkersinpatientswithnegativecystoscopyduringsurveillanceofbladdercancer |