Cargando…

Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of tsetse control methods, their costs need to be analysed alongside their impact on tsetse populations. Very little has been published on the costs of methods specifically targeting human African trypanosomiasis METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Alexandra P. M., Tirados, Inaki, Mangwiro, Clement T. N., Esterhuizen, Johan, Lehane, Michael J., Torr, Stephen J., Kovacic, Vanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25811956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003624
_version_ 1782363537977376768
author Shaw, Alexandra P. M.
Tirados, Inaki
Mangwiro, Clement T. N.
Esterhuizen, Johan
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Stephen J.
Kovacic, Vanja
author_facet Shaw, Alexandra P. M.
Tirados, Inaki
Mangwiro, Clement T. N.
Esterhuizen, Johan
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Stephen J.
Kovacic, Vanja
author_sort Shaw, Alexandra P. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of tsetse control methods, their costs need to be analysed alongside their impact on tsetse populations. Very little has been published on the costs of methods specifically targeting human African trypanosomiasis METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In northern Uganda, a 250 km(2) field trial was undertaken using small (0.5 X 0.25 m) insecticide-treated targets (“tiny targets”). Detailed cost recording accompanied every phase of the work. Costs were calculated for this operation as if managed by the Ugandan vector control services: removing purely research components of the work and applying local salaries. This calculation assumed that all resources are fully used, with no spare capacity. The full cost of the operation was assessed at USD 85.4 per km(2), of which USD 55.7 or 65.2% were field costs, made up of three component activities (target deployment: 34.5%, trap monitoring: 10.6% and target maintenance: 20.1%). The remaining USD 29.7 or 34.8% of the costs were for preliminary studies and administration (tsetse surveys: 6.0%, sensitisation of local populations: 18.6% and office support: 10.2%). Targets accounted for only 12.9% of the total cost, other important cost components were labour (24.1%) and transport (34.6%). DISCUSSION: Comparison with the updated cost of historical HAT vector control projects and recent estimates indicates that this work represents a major reduction in cost levels. This is attributed not just to the low unit cost of tiny targets but also to the organisation of delivery, using local labour with bicycles or motorcycles. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken, investigating key prices and assumptions. It is believed that these costs are generalizable to other HAT foci, although in more remote areas, with denser vegetation and fewer people, costs would increase, as would be the case for other tsetse control techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43747502015-04-04 Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda Shaw, Alexandra P. M. Tirados, Inaki Mangwiro, Clement T. N. Esterhuizen, Johan Lehane, Michael J. Torr, Stephen J. Kovacic, Vanja PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of tsetse control methods, their costs need to be analysed alongside their impact on tsetse populations. Very little has been published on the costs of methods specifically targeting human African trypanosomiasis METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In northern Uganda, a 250 km(2) field trial was undertaken using small (0.5 X 0.25 m) insecticide-treated targets (“tiny targets”). Detailed cost recording accompanied every phase of the work. Costs were calculated for this operation as if managed by the Ugandan vector control services: removing purely research components of the work and applying local salaries. This calculation assumed that all resources are fully used, with no spare capacity. The full cost of the operation was assessed at USD 85.4 per km(2), of which USD 55.7 or 65.2% were field costs, made up of three component activities (target deployment: 34.5%, trap monitoring: 10.6% and target maintenance: 20.1%). The remaining USD 29.7 or 34.8% of the costs were for preliminary studies and administration (tsetse surveys: 6.0%, sensitisation of local populations: 18.6% and office support: 10.2%). Targets accounted for only 12.9% of the total cost, other important cost components were labour (24.1%) and transport (34.6%). DISCUSSION: Comparison with the updated cost of historical HAT vector control projects and recent estimates indicates that this work represents a major reduction in cost levels. This is attributed not just to the low unit cost of tiny targets but also to the organisation of delivery, using local labour with bicycles or motorcycles. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken, investigating key prices and assumptions. It is believed that these costs are generalizable to other HAT foci, although in more remote areas, with denser vegetation and fewer people, costs would increase, as would be the case for other tsetse control techniques. Public Library of Science 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4374750/ /pubmed/25811956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003624 Text en © 2015 Shaw et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shaw, Alexandra P. M.
Tirados, Inaki
Mangwiro, Clement T. N.
Esterhuizen, Johan
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Stephen J.
Kovacic, Vanja
Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title_full Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title_fullStr Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title_short Costs Of Using “Tiny Targets” to Control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a Vector of Gambiense Sleeping Sickness in Arua District of Uganda
title_sort costs of using “tiny targets” to control glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a vector of gambiense sleeping sickness in arua district of uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25811956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003624
work_keys_str_mv AT shawalexandrapm costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT tiradosinaki costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT mangwiroclementtn costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT esterhuizenjohan costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT lehanemichaelj costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT torrstephenj costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda
AT kovacicvanja costsofusingtinytargetstocontrolglossinafuscipesfuscipesavectorofgambiensesleepingsicknessinaruadistrictofuganda