Cargando…

Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries

BACKGROUND: Screening of household contacts of tuberculosis (TB) patients is a recommended strategy to improve early case detection. While it has been widely implemented in low prevalence countries, the most optimal protocols for contact investigation in high prevalence, low resource settings is yet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blok, Lucie, Sahu, Suvanand, Creswell, Jacob, Alba, Sandra, Stevens, Robert, Bakker, Mirjam I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119822
_version_ 1782363566726184960
author Blok, Lucie
Sahu, Suvanand
Creswell, Jacob
Alba, Sandra
Stevens, Robert
Bakker, Mirjam I.
author_facet Blok, Lucie
Sahu, Suvanand
Creswell, Jacob
Alba, Sandra
Stevens, Robert
Bakker, Mirjam I.
author_sort Blok, Lucie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening of household contacts of tuberculosis (TB) patients is a recommended strategy to improve early case detection. While it has been widely implemented in low prevalence countries, the most optimal protocols for contact investigation in high prevalence, low resource settings is yet to be determined. This study evaluated contact investigation interventions in eleven lower and middle income countries and reviewed the association between context or program-related factors and the yield of cases among contacts. METHODS: We reviewed data from nineteen first wave TB REACH funded projects piloting innovations to improve case detection. These nineteen had fulfilled the eligibility criteria: contact investigation implementation and complete data reporting. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the percentage yield and case notifications for each project. Implementation strategies were delineated and the association between independent variables and yield was analyzed by fitting a random effects logistic regression. FINDINGS: Overall, the nineteen interventions screened 139,052 household contacts, showing great heterogeneity in the percentage yield of microscopy confirmed cases (SS+), ranging from 0.1% to 6.2%). Compared to the most restrictive testing criteria (at least two weeks of cough) the aOR’s for lesser (any TB related symptom) and least (all contacts) restrictive testing criteria were 1.71 (95%CI 0.94−3.13) and 6.90 (95% CI 3.42−13.93) respectively. The aOR for inclusion of SS- and extra-pulmonary TB was 0.31 (95% CI 0.15−0.62) compared to restricting index cases to SS+ TB. Contact investigation contributed between <1% and 14% to all SS+ cases diagnosed in the intervention areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that high numbers of active TB cases can be identified through contact investigation in a variety of contexts. However, design and program implementation factors appear to influence the yield of contact investigation and its concomitant contribution to TB case detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4374904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43749042015-04-04 Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries Blok, Lucie Sahu, Suvanand Creswell, Jacob Alba, Sandra Stevens, Robert Bakker, Mirjam I. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening of household contacts of tuberculosis (TB) patients is a recommended strategy to improve early case detection. While it has been widely implemented in low prevalence countries, the most optimal protocols for contact investigation in high prevalence, low resource settings is yet to be determined. This study evaluated contact investigation interventions in eleven lower and middle income countries and reviewed the association between context or program-related factors and the yield of cases among contacts. METHODS: We reviewed data from nineteen first wave TB REACH funded projects piloting innovations to improve case detection. These nineteen had fulfilled the eligibility criteria: contact investigation implementation and complete data reporting. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the percentage yield and case notifications for each project. Implementation strategies were delineated and the association between independent variables and yield was analyzed by fitting a random effects logistic regression. FINDINGS: Overall, the nineteen interventions screened 139,052 household contacts, showing great heterogeneity in the percentage yield of microscopy confirmed cases (SS+), ranging from 0.1% to 6.2%). Compared to the most restrictive testing criteria (at least two weeks of cough) the aOR’s for lesser (any TB related symptom) and least (all contacts) restrictive testing criteria were 1.71 (95%CI 0.94−3.13) and 6.90 (95% CI 3.42−13.93) respectively. The aOR for inclusion of SS- and extra-pulmonary TB was 0.31 (95% CI 0.15−0.62) compared to restricting index cases to SS+ TB. Contact investigation contributed between <1% and 14% to all SS+ cases diagnosed in the intervention areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that high numbers of active TB cases can be identified through contact investigation in a variety of contexts. However, design and program implementation factors appear to influence the yield of contact investigation and its concomitant contribution to TB case detection. Public Library of Science 2015-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4374904/ /pubmed/25812013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119822 Text en © 2015 Blok et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blok, Lucie
Sahu, Suvanand
Creswell, Jacob
Alba, Sandra
Stevens, Robert
Bakker, Mirjam I.
Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title_full Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title_fullStr Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title_short Comparative Meta-Analysis of Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Interventions in Eleven High Burden Countries
title_sort comparative meta-analysis of tuberculosis contact investigation interventions in eleven high burden countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119822
work_keys_str_mv AT bloklucie comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries
AT sahusuvanand comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries
AT creswelljacob comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries
AT albasandra comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries
AT stevensrobert comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries
AT bakkermirjami comparativemetaanalysisoftuberculosiscontactinvestigationinterventionsinelevenhighburdencountries