Cargando…

Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms

Although current neuroscience and behavioral studies provide substantial understanding of tool representations (e.g., the processing of tool-related affordances) in the human brain, most of this knowledge is limited to right-handed individuals with typical organization of cognitive and manual skills...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michałowski, Bartosz, Króliczak, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4375976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25870553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00166
_version_ 1782363659255676928
author Michałowski, Bartosz
Króliczak, Gregory
author_facet Michałowski, Bartosz
Króliczak, Gregory
author_sort Michałowski, Bartosz
collection PubMed
description Although current neuroscience and behavioral studies provide substantial understanding of tool representations (e.g., the processing of tool-related affordances) in the human brain, most of this knowledge is limited to right-handed individuals with typical organization of cognitive and manual skills. Therefore, any insights from these lines of research may be of little value in rehabilitation of patients with atypical laterality of praxis and/or hand dominance. To fill this gap, we tested perceptual processing of man-made objects in 18 healthy left-handers who were likely to show greater incidence of right-sided or bilateral (atypical) lateralization of functions. In the two experiments reported here, participants performed a tool vs. non-tool categorization task. In Experiment 1, target and distracter objects were presented for 200 ms in the left (LVF) or right (RVF) visual field, followed by 200 ms masks. In Experiment 2, the centrally presented targets were preceded by masked primes of 35 ms duration, again presented in the LVF or RVF. Based on results from both studies, i.e., response times (RTs) to correctly discriminated stimuli irrespective of their category, participants were divided into two groups showing privileged processing in either left (N = 9) or right (N = 9) visual field. In Experiment 1, only individuals with RVF advantage showed significantly faster categorization of tools in their dominant visual field, whereas those with LVF advantage revealed merely a trend toward such an effect. In Experiment 2, when targets were preceded by identical primes, the “atypical” group showed significantly facilitated categorization of non-tools, whereas the “typical” group demonstrated a trend toward faster categorization of tools. These results indicate that in subjects with atypically organized cognitive skills, tool-related processes are not just mirror reversed. Thus, our outcomes call for particular caution in neurorehabilitation directed at left-handed individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4375976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43759762015-04-13 Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms Michałowski, Bartosz Króliczak, Gregory Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Although current neuroscience and behavioral studies provide substantial understanding of tool representations (e.g., the processing of tool-related affordances) in the human brain, most of this knowledge is limited to right-handed individuals with typical organization of cognitive and manual skills. Therefore, any insights from these lines of research may be of little value in rehabilitation of patients with atypical laterality of praxis and/or hand dominance. To fill this gap, we tested perceptual processing of man-made objects in 18 healthy left-handers who were likely to show greater incidence of right-sided or bilateral (atypical) lateralization of functions. In the two experiments reported here, participants performed a tool vs. non-tool categorization task. In Experiment 1, target and distracter objects were presented for 200 ms in the left (LVF) or right (RVF) visual field, followed by 200 ms masks. In Experiment 2, the centrally presented targets were preceded by masked primes of 35 ms duration, again presented in the LVF or RVF. Based on results from both studies, i.e., response times (RTs) to correctly discriminated stimuli irrespective of their category, participants were divided into two groups showing privileged processing in either left (N = 9) or right (N = 9) visual field. In Experiment 1, only individuals with RVF advantage showed significantly faster categorization of tools in their dominant visual field, whereas those with LVF advantage revealed merely a trend toward such an effect. In Experiment 2, when targets were preceded by identical primes, the “atypical” group showed significantly facilitated categorization of non-tools, whereas the “typical” group demonstrated a trend toward faster categorization of tools. These results indicate that in subjects with atypically organized cognitive skills, tool-related processes are not just mirror reversed. Thus, our outcomes call for particular caution in neurorehabilitation directed at left-handed individuals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4375976/ /pubmed/25870553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00166 Text en Copyright © 2015 Michałowski and Króliczak. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Michałowski, Bartosz
Króliczak, Gregory
Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title_full Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title_fullStr Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title_short Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
title_sort sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4375976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25870553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00166
work_keys_str_mv AT michałowskibartosz sinistralsarerarelyrightevidencefromtoolaffordanceprocessinginvisualhalffieldparadigms
AT kroliczakgregory sinistralsarerarelyrightevidencefromtoolaffordanceprocessinginvisualhalffieldparadigms