Cargando…

Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability

OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarenga, Marina Barreto, Francisco, Adriana Amorim, de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos, da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa, Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika, Damiani, Lucas Petri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538
_version_ 1782363671348903936
author Alvarenga, Marina Barreto
Francisco, Adriana Amorim
de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos
da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa
Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika
Damiani, Lucas Petri
author_facet Alvarenga, Marina Barreto
Francisco, Adriana Amorim
de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos
da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa
Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika
Damiani, Lucas Petri
author_sort Alvarenga, Marina Barreto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected women, who had their perineal healing assessed at four time points, from 6 hours to 10 days after delivery, by nurses trained in the use of this scale. The kappa coefficient was used in the reliability analysis of the REEDA scale. RESULTS: the results indicate good agreement in the evaluation of the discharge item (0.75< Kappa ≥0.88), marginal and good agreement in the first three assessments of oedema (0.16< Kappa ≥0.46), marginal agreement in the evaluation of ecchymosis (0.25< Kappa ≥0.42) and good agreement regarding redness (0.46< Kappa ≥0.66). For the item coaptation, the agreement decreased from excellent in the first assessment to good in the last assessment. In the fourth evaluation, the assessment of all items displayed excellent or good agreement among the evaluators. CONCLUSION: the difference in the scores among the evaluators when applying the scale indicates that this tool must be improved to allow an accurate assessment of the episiotomy healing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43760452015-03-31 Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability Alvarenga, Marina Barreto Francisco, Adriana Amorim de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika Damiani, Lucas Petri Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected women, who had their perineal healing assessed at four time points, from 6 hours to 10 days after delivery, by nurses trained in the use of this scale. The kappa coefficient was used in the reliability analysis of the REEDA scale. RESULTS: the results indicate good agreement in the evaluation of the discharge item (0.75< Kappa ≥0.88), marginal and good agreement in the first three assessments of oedema (0.16< Kappa ≥0.46), marginal agreement in the evaluation of ecchymosis (0.25< Kappa ≥0.42) and good agreement regarding redness (0.46< Kappa ≥0.66). For the item coaptation, the agreement decreased from excellent in the first assessment to good in the last assessment. In the fourth evaluation, the assessment of all items displayed excellent or good agreement among the evaluators. CONCLUSION: the difference in the scores among the evaluators when applying the scale indicates that this tool must be improved to allow an accurate assessment of the episiotomy healing process. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4376045/ /pubmed/25806645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Alvarenga, Marina Barreto
Francisco, Adriana Amorim
de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos
da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa
Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika
Damiani, Lucas Petri
Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title_full Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title_fullStr Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title_full_unstemmed Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title_short Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
title_sort episiotomy healing assessment: redness, oedema, ecchymosis, discharge, approximation (reeda) scale reliability
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarengamarinabarreto episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability
AT franciscoadrianaamorim episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability
AT deoliveirasoniamariajunqueiravasconcellos episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability
AT dasilvafloramariabarbosa episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability
AT shimodagilceriatochika episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability
AT damianilucaspetri episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability