Cargando…
Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538 |
_version_ | 1782363671348903936 |
---|---|
author | Alvarenga, Marina Barreto Francisco, Adriana Amorim de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika Damiani, Lucas Petri |
author_facet | Alvarenga, Marina Barreto Francisco, Adriana Amorim de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika Damiani, Lucas Petri |
author_sort | Alvarenga, Marina Barreto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected women, who had their perineal healing assessed at four time points, from 6 hours to 10 days after delivery, by nurses trained in the use of this scale. The kappa coefficient was used in the reliability analysis of the REEDA scale. RESULTS: the results indicate good agreement in the evaluation of the discharge item (0.75< Kappa ≥0.88), marginal and good agreement in the first three assessments of oedema (0.16< Kappa ≥0.46), marginal agreement in the evaluation of ecchymosis (0.25< Kappa ≥0.42) and good agreement regarding redness (0.46< Kappa ≥0.66). For the item coaptation, the agreement decreased from excellent in the first assessment to good in the last assessment. In the fourth evaluation, the assessment of all items displayed excellent or good agreement among the evaluators. CONCLUSION: the difference in the scores among the evaluators when applying the scale indicates that this tool must be improved to allow an accurate assessment of the episiotomy healing process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4376045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43760452015-03-31 Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability Alvarenga, Marina Barreto Francisco, Adriana Amorim de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika Damiani, Lucas Petri Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVE: to analyse the Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability when evaluating perineal healing after a normal delivery with a right mediolateral episiotomy. METHOD: observational study based on data from a clinical trial conducted with 54 randomly selected women, who had their perineal healing assessed at four time points, from 6 hours to 10 days after delivery, by nurses trained in the use of this scale. The kappa coefficient was used in the reliability analysis of the REEDA scale. RESULTS: the results indicate good agreement in the evaluation of the discharge item (0.75< Kappa ≥0.88), marginal and good agreement in the first three assessments of oedema (0.16< Kappa ≥0.46), marginal agreement in the evaluation of ecchymosis (0.25< Kappa ≥0.42) and good agreement regarding redness (0.46< Kappa ≥0.66). For the item coaptation, the agreement decreased from excellent in the first assessment to good in the last assessment. In the fourth evaluation, the assessment of all items displayed excellent or good agreement among the evaluators. CONCLUSION: the difference in the scores among the evaluators when applying the scale indicates that this tool must be improved to allow an accurate assessment of the episiotomy healing process. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4376045/ /pubmed/25806645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Alvarenga, Marina Barreto Francisco, Adriana Amorim de Oliveira, Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos da Silva, Flora Maria Barbosa Shimoda, Gilcéria Tochika Damiani, Lucas Petri Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability |
title | Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge,
Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
|
title_full | Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge,
Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
|
title_fullStr | Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge,
Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
|
title_full_unstemmed | Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge,
Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
|
title_short | Episiotomy healing assessment: Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge,
Approximation (REEDA) scale reliability
|
title_sort | episiotomy healing assessment: redness, oedema, ecchymosis, discharge,
approximation (reeda) scale reliability |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25806645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3633.2538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvarengamarinabarreto episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability AT franciscoadrianaamorim episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability AT deoliveirasoniamariajunqueiravasconcellos episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability AT dasilvafloramariabarbosa episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability AT shimodagilceriatochika episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability AT damianilucaspetri episiotomyhealingassessmentrednessoedemaecchymosisdischargeapproximationreedascalereliability |