Cargando…
Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement
BACKGROUND: Surveying patients is increasingly important for evaluating and improving health care delivery, but practical survey strategies during routine care activities have not been available. OBJECTIVE: We examined the feasibility of conducting routine patient surveys in a primary care clinic us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768807 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3697 |
_version_ | 1782363696947789824 |
---|---|
author | Wofford, James Lucius Campos, Claudia L Jones, Robert E Stevens, Sheila F |
author_facet | Wofford, James Lucius Campos, Claudia L Jones, Robert E Stevens, Sheila F |
author_sort | Wofford, James Lucius |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surveying patients is increasingly important for evaluating and improving health care delivery, but practical survey strategies during routine care activities have not been available. OBJECTIVE: We examined the feasibility of conducting routine patient surveys in a primary care clinic using commercially available technology (Web-based survey creation, deployment on tablet computers, cloud-based management of survey data) to expedite and enhance several steps in data collection and management for rapid quality improvement cycles. METHODS: We used a Web-based data management tool (survey creation, deployment on tablet computers, real-time data accumulation and display of survey results) to conduct four patient surveys during routine clinic sessions over a one-month period. Each survey consisted of three questions and focused on a specific patient care domain (dental care, waiting room experience, care access/continuity, Internet connectivity). RESULTS: Of the 727 available patients during clinic survey days, 316 patients (43.4%) attempted the survey, and 293 (40.3%) completed the survey. For the four 3-question surveys, the average time per survey was overall 40.4 seconds, with a range of 5.4 to 20.3 seconds for individual questions. Yes/No questions took less time than multiple choice questions (average 9.6 seconds versus 14.0). Average response time showed no clear pattern by order of questions or by proctor strategy, but monotonically increased with number of words in the question (<20 words, 21-30 words, >30 words)—8.0, 11.8, 16.8, seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This technology-enabled data management system helped capture patient opinions, accelerate turnaround of survey data, with minimal impact on a busy primary care clinic. This new model of patient survey data management is feasible and sustainable in a busy office setting, supports and engages clinicians in the quality improvement process, and harmonizes with the vision of a learning health care system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4376172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43761722015-04-02 Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement Wofford, James Lucius Campos, Claudia L Jones, Robert E Stevens, Sheila F JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Surveying patients is increasingly important for evaluating and improving health care delivery, but practical survey strategies during routine care activities have not been available. OBJECTIVE: We examined the feasibility of conducting routine patient surveys in a primary care clinic using commercially available technology (Web-based survey creation, deployment on tablet computers, cloud-based management of survey data) to expedite and enhance several steps in data collection and management for rapid quality improvement cycles. METHODS: We used a Web-based data management tool (survey creation, deployment on tablet computers, real-time data accumulation and display of survey results) to conduct four patient surveys during routine clinic sessions over a one-month period. Each survey consisted of three questions and focused on a specific patient care domain (dental care, waiting room experience, care access/continuity, Internet connectivity). RESULTS: Of the 727 available patients during clinic survey days, 316 patients (43.4%) attempted the survey, and 293 (40.3%) completed the survey. For the four 3-question surveys, the average time per survey was overall 40.4 seconds, with a range of 5.4 to 20.3 seconds for individual questions. Yes/No questions took less time than multiple choice questions (average 9.6 seconds versus 14.0). Average response time showed no clear pattern by order of questions or by proctor strategy, but monotonically increased with number of words in the question (<20 words, 21-30 words, >30 words)—8.0, 11.8, 16.8, seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This technology-enabled data management system helped capture patient opinions, accelerate turnaround of survey data, with minimal impact on a busy primary care clinic. This new model of patient survey data management is feasible and sustainable in a busy office setting, supports and engages clinicians in the quality improvement process, and harmonizes with the vision of a learning health care system. Gunther Eysenbach 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4376172/ /pubmed/25768807 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3697 Text en ©James Lucius Wofford, Claudia L Campos, Robert E Jones, Sheila F Stevens. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 12.03.2015. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Wofford, James Lucius Campos, Claudia L Jones, Robert E Stevens, Sheila F Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title | Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title_full | Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title_fullStr | Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title_short | Real-Time Patient Survey Data During Routine Clinical Activities for Rapid-Cycle Quality Improvement |
title_sort | real-time patient survey data during routine clinical activities for rapid-cycle quality improvement |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25768807 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woffordjameslucius realtimepatientsurveydataduringroutineclinicalactivitiesforrapidcyclequalityimprovement AT camposclaudial realtimepatientsurveydataduringroutineclinicalactivitiesforrapidcyclequalityimprovement AT jonesroberte realtimepatientsurveydataduringroutineclinicalactivitiesforrapidcyclequalityimprovement AT stevenssheilaf realtimepatientsurveydataduringroutineclinicalactivitiesforrapidcyclequalityimprovement |