Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol

BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a novel treatment technique utilizing electric pulses, traveling between two or more electrodes, to ablate targeted tissue. The first in human studies have proven the safety of IRE for the ablation of renal masses. However the efficacy of IRE through histopathological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagstaff, Peter GK, de Bruin, Daniel M, Zondervan, Patricia J, Savci Heijink, C Dilara, Engelbrecht, Marc RW, van Delden, Otto M, van Leeuwen, Ton G, Wijkstra, Hessel, de la Rosette, Jean JMCH, Laguna Pes, M Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1189-x
_version_ 1782363723980079104
author Wagstaff, Peter GK
de Bruin, Daniel M
Zondervan, Patricia J
Savci Heijink, C Dilara
Engelbrecht, Marc RW
van Delden, Otto M
van Leeuwen, Ton G
Wijkstra, Hessel
de la Rosette, Jean JMCH
Laguna Pes, M Pilar
author_facet Wagstaff, Peter GK
de Bruin, Daniel M
Zondervan, Patricia J
Savci Heijink, C Dilara
Engelbrecht, Marc RW
van Delden, Otto M
van Leeuwen, Ton G
Wijkstra, Hessel
de la Rosette, Jean JMCH
Laguna Pes, M Pilar
author_sort Wagstaff, Peter GK
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a novel treatment technique utilizing electric pulses, traveling between two or more electrodes, to ablate targeted tissue. The first in human studies have proven the safety of IRE for the ablation of renal masses. However the efficacy of IRE through histopathological examination of an ablated renal tumour has not yet been studied. Before progressing to a long-term IRE follow-up study it is vital to have pathological confirmation of the efficacy of the technique. Furthermore, follow-up after IRE ablation requires a validated imaging modality. The primary objectives of this study are the safety and the efficacy of IRE ablation of renal masses. The secondary objectives are the efficacy of MRI and CEUS in the imaging of ablation result. METHODS/DESIGN: 10 patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with a solid enhancing mass, who are candidates for radical nephrectomy will undergo IRE ablation 4 weeks prior to radical nephrectomy. MRI and CEUS imaging will be performed at baseline, one week and four weeks post IRE. After radical nephrectomy, pathological examination will be performed to evaluate IRE ablation success. DISCUSSION: The only way to truly assess short-term (4 weeks) ablation success is by histopathology of a resection specimen. In our opinion this trial will provide essential knowledge on the safety and efficacy of IRE of renal masses, guiding future research of this promising ablative technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02298608. Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL44785.018.13
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43763412015-03-28 The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol Wagstaff, Peter GK de Bruin, Daniel M Zondervan, Patricia J Savci Heijink, C Dilara Engelbrecht, Marc RW van Delden, Otto M van Leeuwen, Ton G Wijkstra, Hessel de la Rosette, Jean JMCH Laguna Pes, M Pilar BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a novel treatment technique utilizing electric pulses, traveling between two or more electrodes, to ablate targeted tissue. The first in human studies have proven the safety of IRE for the ablation of renal masses. However the efficacy of IRE through histopathological examination of an ablated renal tumour has not yet been studied. Before progressing to a long-term IRE follow-up study it is vital to have pathological confirmation of the efficacy of the technique. Furthermore, follow-up after IRE ablation requires a validated imaging modality. The primary objectives of this study are the safety and the efficacy of IRE ablation of renal masses. The secondary objectives are the efficacy of MRI and CEUS in the imaging of ablation result. METHODS/DESIGN: 10 patients, age ≥ 18 years, presenting with a solid enhancing mass, who are candidates for radical nephrectomy will undergo IRE ablation 4 weeks prior to radical nephrectomy. MRI and CEUS imaging will be performed at baseline, one week and four weeks post IRE. After radical nephrectomy, pathological examination will be performed to evaluate IRE ablation success. DISCUSSION: The only way to truly assess short-term (4 weeks) ablation success is by histopathology of a resection specimen. In our opinion this trial will provide essential knowledge on the safety and efficacy of IRE of renal masses, guiding future research of this promising ablative technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02298608. Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL44785.018.13 BioMed Central 2015-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4376341/ /pubmed/25886058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1189-x Text en © Wagstaff et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wagstaff, Peter GK
de Bruin, Daniel M
Zondervan, Patricia J
Savci Heijink, C Dilara
Engelbrecht, Marc RW
van Delden, Otto M
van Leeuwen, Ton G
Wijkstra, Hessel
de la Rosette, Jean JMCH
Laguna Pes, M Pilar
The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title_full The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title_short The efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
title_sort efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for the ablation of renal masses: a prospective, human, in-vivo study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1189-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wagstaffpetergk theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT debruindanielm theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT zondervanpatriciaj theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT savciheijinkcdilara theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT engelbrechtmarcrw theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT vandeldenottom theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT vanleeuwentong theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT wijkstrahessel theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT delarosettejeanjmch theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT lagunapesmpilar theefficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT wagstaffpetergk efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT debruindanielm efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT zondervanpatriciaj efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT savciheijinkcdilara efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT engelbrechtmarcrw efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT vandeldenottom efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT vanleeuwentong efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT wijkstrahessel efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT delarosettejeanjmch efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol
AT lagunapesmpilar efficacyandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationfortheablationofrenalmassesaprospectivehumaninvivostudyprotocol