Cargando…

A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses

BACKGROUND: Deprivation indices are useful measures to analyze health inequalities. There are several methods to construct these indices, however, few studies have used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria methods to construct a deprivation index. Therefore, this study applies Mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabrera-Barona, Pablo, Murphy, Thomas, Kienberger, Stefan, Blaschke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0004-x
_version_ 1782363728162848768
author Cabrera-Barona, Pablo
Murphy, Thomas
Kienberger, Stefan
Blaschke, Thomas
author_facet Cabrera-Barona, Pablo
Murphy, Thomas
Kienberger, Stefan
Blaschke, Thomas
author_sort Cabrera-Barona, Pablo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deprivation indices are useful measures to analyze health inequalities. There are several methods to construct these indices, however, few studies have used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria methods to construct a deprivation index. Therefore, this study applies Multi-Criteria Evaluation to calculate weights for the indicators that make up the deprivation index and a GIS-based fuzzy approach to create different scenarios of this index is also implemented. METHODS: The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to obtain the weights for the indicators of the index. The Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) method using linguistic quantifiers is applied in order to create different deprivation scenarios. Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and a Moran’s I analysis are employed to explore spatial relationships between the different deprivation measures and two health factors: the distance to health services and the percentage of people that have never had a live birth. This last indicator was considered as the dependent variable in the GWR. The case study is Quito City, in Ecuador. RESULTS: The AHP-based deprivation index show medium and high levels of deprivation (0,511 to 1,000) in specific zones of the study area, even though most of the study area has low values of deprivation. OWA results show deprivation scenarios that can be evaluated considering the different attitudes of decision makers. GWR results indicate that the deprivation index and its OWA scenarios can be considered as local estimators for health related phenomena. Moran’s I calculations demonstrate that several deprivation scenarios, in combination with the ‘distance to health services’ factor, could be explanatory variables to predict the percentage of people that have never had a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: The AHP-based deprivation index and the OWA deprivation scenarios developed in this study are Multi-Criteria instruments that can support the identification of highly deprived zones and can support health inequalities analysis in combination with different health factors. The methodology described in this study can be applied in other regions of the world to develop spatial deprivation indices based on Multi-Criteria analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43763702015-03-28 A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses Cabrera-Barona, Pablo Murphy, Thomas Kienberger, Stefan Blaschke, Thomas Int J Health Geogr Methodology BACKGROUND: Deprivation indices are useful measures to analyze health inequalities. There are several methods to construct these indices, however, few studies have used Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria methods to construct a deprivation index. Therefore, this study applies Multi-Criteria Evaluation to calculate weights for the indicators that make up the deprivation index and a GIS-based fuzzy approach to create different scenarios of this index is also implemented. METHODS: The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to obtain the weights for the indicators of the index. The Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) method using linguistic quantifiers is applied in order to create different deprivation scenarios. Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and a Moran’s I analysis are employed to explore spatial relationships between the different deprivation measures and two health factors: the distance to health services and the percentage of people that have never had a live birth. This last indicator was considered as the dependent variable in the GWR. The case study is Quito City, in Ecuador. RESULTS: The AHP-based deprivation index show medium and high levels of deprivation (0,511 to 1,000) in specific zones of the study area, even though most of the study area has low values of deprivation. OWA results show deprivation scenarios that can be evaluated considering the different attitudes of decision makers. GWR results indicate that the deprivation index and its OWA scenarios can be considered as local estimators for health related phenomena. Moran’s I calculations demonstrate that several deprivation scenarios, in combination with the ‘distance to health services’ factor, could be explanatory variables to predict the percentage of people that have never had a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: The AHP-based deprivation index and the OWA deprivation scenarios developed in this study are Multi-Criteria instruments that can support the identification of highly deprived zones and can support health inequalities analysis in combination with different health factors. The methodology described in this study can be applied in other regions of the world to develop spatial deprivation indices based on Multi-Criteria analysis. BioMed Central 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4376370/ /pubmed/25888924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0004-x Text en © Cabrera Barona et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Cabrera-Barona, Pablo
Murphy, Thomas
Kienberger, Stefan
Blaschke, Thomas
A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title_full A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title_fullStr A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title_full_unstemmed A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title_short A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
title_sort multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0004-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cabrerabaronapablo amulticriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT murphythomas amulticriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT kienbergerstefan amulticriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT blaschkethomas amulticriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT cabrerabaronapablo multicriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT murphythomas multicriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT kienbergerstefan multicriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses
AT blaschkethomas multicriteriaspatialdeprivationindextosupporthealthinequalityanalyses