Cargando…

Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations

Human judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ring, Patrick, Kaernbach, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120989
_version_ 1782363729812258816
author Ring, Patrick
Kaernbach, Christian
author_facet Ring, Patrick
Kaernbach, Christian
author_sort Ring, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Human judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings, it appears relevant to understand how individuals asses the attractiveness or riskiness of a situation in terms of emotional processes. The following study aims at a better understanding of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying threat sensitivity by measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) in passive threat situations. While previous studies demonstrate the role of magnitude on emotional body reactions preceding an outcome, this study focuses on probability. In order to analyze emotional body reactions preceding negative events with varying probability of occurrence, we have our participants play a two-stage card game. The first stage of the card game reveals the probability of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. The second stage applies the electric shock with the previously announced probability. For the analysis, we focus on the time interval between the first and second stage. We observe a linear relation between SCRs in anticipation of receiving an electric shock and shock probability. This finding indicates that SCRs are able to code the likelihood of negative events. We outline how this coding function of SCRs during the anticipation of negative events might add to an understanding of human JDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43763842015-04-04 Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations Ring, Patrick Kaernbach, Christian PLoS One Research Article Human judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings, it appears relevant to understand how individuals asses the attractiveness or riskiness of a situation in terms of emotional processes. The following study aims at a better understanding of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying threat sensitivity by measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) in passive threat situations. While previous studies demonstrate the role of magnitude on emotional body reactions preceding an outcome, this study focuses on probability. In order to analyze emotional body reactions preceding negative events with varying probability of occurrence, we have our participants play a two-stage card game. The first stage of the card game reveals the probability of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. The second stage applies the electric shock with the previously announced probability. For the analysis, we focus on the time interval between the first and second stage. We observe a linear relation between SCRs in anticipation of receiving an electric shock and shock probability. This finding indicates that SCRs are able to code the likelihood of negative events. We outline how this coding function of SCRs during the anticipation of negative events might add to an understanding of human JDM. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376384/ /pubmed/25816373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120989 Text en © 2015 Ring, Kaernbach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ring, Patrick
Kaernbach, Christian
Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title_full Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title_fullStr Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title_short Sensitivity towards Fear of Electric Shock in Passive Threat Situations
title_sort sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120989
work_keys_str_mv AT ringpatrick sensitivitytowardsfearofelectricshockinpassivethreatsituations
AT kaernbachchristian sensitivitytowardsfearofelectricshockinpassivethreatsituations