Cargando…
Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122 |
_version_ | 1782363730498027520 |
---|---|
author | Chow, Carson C. Finn, Kelsey K. Storchan, Geoffery B. Lu, Xinping Sheng, Xiaoyan Simons, S. Stoney |
author_facet | Chow, Carson C. Finn, Kelsey K. Storchan, Geoffery B. Lu, Xinping Sheng, Xiaoyan Simons, S. Stoney |
author_sort | Chow, Carson C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is the same in both. Because activity classifications based on changes in gene product level are mechanistically uninformative, we present a theory for gene repression in which the mechanisms of factor action are defined kinetically and are consistent for both gene repression and induction. The theory is generally applicable and amenable to predictions if the dose-response curve for gene repression is non-cooperative with a unit Hill coefficient, which is observed for GR-regulated repression of AP1LUC reporter induction by phorbol myristate acetate. The theory predicts the mechanism of GR and cofactors, and where they act with respect to each other, based on how each cofactor alters the plots of various kinetic parameters vs. cofactor. We show that the kinetically-defined mechanism of action of each of four factors (reporter gene, p160 coactivator TIF2, and two pharmaceuticals [NU6027 and phenanthroline]) is the same in GR-regulated repression and induction. What differs is the position of GR action. This insight should simplify clinical efforts to differentially modulate factor actions in gene induction vs. gene repression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4376387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43763872015-04-04 Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression Chow, Carson C. Finn, Kelsey K. Storchan, Geoffery B. Lu, Xinping Sheng, Xiaoyan Simons, S. Stoney PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is the same in both. Because activity classifications based on changes in gene product level are mechanistically uninformative, we present a theory for gene repression in which the mechanisms of factor action are defined kinetically and are consistent for both gene repression and induction. The theory is generally applicable and amenable to predictions if the dose-response curve for gene repression is non-cooperative with a unit Hill coefficient, which is observed for GR-regulated repression of AP1LUC reporter induction by phorbol myristate acetate. The theory predicts the mechanism of GR and cofactors, and where they act with respect to each other, based on how each cofactor alters the plots of various kinetic parameters vs. cofactor. We show that the kinetically-defined mechanism of action of each of four factors (reporter gene, p160 coactivator TIF2, and two pharmaceuticals [NU6027 and phenanthroline]) is the same in GR-regulated repression and induction. What differs is the position of GR action. This insight should simplify clinical efforts to differentially modulate factor actions in gene induction vs. gene repression. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376387/ /pubmed/25816223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chow, Carson C. Finn, Kelsey K. Storchan, Geoffery B. Lu, Xinping Sheng, Xiaoyan Simons, S. Stoney Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title | Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title_full | Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title_fullStr | Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title_full_unstemmed | Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title_short | Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression |
title_sort | kinetically-defined component actions in gene repression |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowcarsonc kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression AT finnkelseyk kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression AT storchangeofferyb kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression AT luxinping kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression AT shengxiaoyan kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression AT simonssstoney kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression |