Cargando…

Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression

Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Carson C., Finn, Kelsey K., Storchan, Geoffery B., Lu, Xinping, Sheng, Xiaoyan, Simons, S. Stoney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122
_version_ 1782363730498027520
author Chow, Carson C.
Finn, Kelsey K.
Storchan, Geoffery B.
Lu, Xinping
Sheng, Xiaoyan
Simons, S. Stoney
author_facet Chow, Carson C.
Finn, Kelsey K.
Storchan, Geoffery B.
Lu, Xinping
Sheng, Xiaoyan
Simons, S. Stoney
author_sort Chow, Carson C.
collection PubMed
description Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is the same in both. Because activity classifications based on changes in gene product level are mechanistically uninformative, we present a theory for gene repression in which the mechanisms of factor action are defined kinetically and are consistent for both gene repression and induction. The theory is generally applicable and amenable to predictions if the dose-response curve for gene repression is non-cooperative with a unit Hill coefficient, which is observed for GR-regulated repression of AP1LUC reporter induction by phorbol myristate acetate. The theory predicts the mechanism of GR and cofactors, and where they act with respect to each other, based on how each cofactor alters the plots of various kinetic parameters vs. cofactor. We show that the kinetically-defined mechanism of action of each of four factors (reporter gene, p160 coactivator TIF2, and two pharmaceuticals [NU6027 and phenanthroline]) is the same in GR-regulated repression and induction. What differs is the position of GR action. This insight should simplify clinical efforts to differentially modulate factor actions in gene induction vs. gene repression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4376387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43763872015-04-04 Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression Chow, Carson C. Finn, Kelsey K. Storchan, Geoffery B. Lu, Xinping Sheng, Xiaoyan Simons, S. Stoney PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is the same in both. Because activity classifications based on changes in gene product level are mechanistically uninformative, we present a theory for gene repression in which the mechanisms of factor action are defined kinetically and are consistent for both gene repression and induction. The theory is generally applicable and amenable to predictions if the dose-response curve for gene repression is non-cooperative with a unit Hill coefficient, which is observed for GR-regulated repression of AP1LUC reporter induction by phorbol myristate acetate. The theory predicts the mechanism of GR and cofactors, and where they act with respect to each other, based on how each cofactor alters the plots of various kinetic parameters vs. cofactor. We show that the kinetically-defined mechanism of action of each of four factors (reporter gene, p160 coactivator TIF2, and two pharmaceuticals [NU6027 and phenanthroline]) is the same in GR-regulated repression and induction. What differs is the position of GR action. This insight should simplify clinical efforts to differentially modulate factor actions in gene induction vs. gene repression. Public Library of Science 2015-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4376387/ /pubmed/25816223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chow, Carson C.
Finn, Kelsey K.
Storchan, Geoffery B.
Lu, Xinping
Sheng, Xiaoyan
Simons, S. Stoney
Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title_full Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title_fullStr Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title_full_unstemmed Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title_short Kinetically-Defined Component Actions in Gene Repression
title_sort kinetically-defined component actions in gene repression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4376387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25816223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122
work_keys_str_mv AT chowcarsonc kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression
AT finnkelseyk kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression
AT storchangeofferyb kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression
AT luxinping kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression
AT shengxiaoyan kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression
AT simonssstoney kineticallydefinedcomponentactionsingenerepression